Advertisement

Design of Interactive Toy as Support Tool in STEM Education for Children with Special Needs

  • Sandra Cano
  • Sandra P. Mosquera
  • Victor M. Peñeñory
  • Pablo A. Bejarano
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 847)

Abstract

STEM education relates to a set of disciplines relevant as: Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Children with special needs (CSN) face many challenges in the classroom, since their learning may change depending on their disability or disorder. Teachers must use communication strategies and learning methods that can be adapted to their needs. The proposal is based on building a principal character, with one or several missions to fulfill, with whom the child can interact in areas of knowledge such as mathematics, literacy and computational thinking. The interactive toy called “Learning with Tobi” has the advantage of offering a rich playable environment in terms of use of multimedia and interactive usability, integrating the digital with traditional dolls. Nowadays, with the technology growth all the things tend to be connected. IoT offers a platform for sensors and devices to communicate seamlessly within smart environment and enables information sharing across platforms in a appropriate manner. Therefore, designing the Tobi interactive teddy bear, low-cost with electronic components and sensors as RFID, Gyroscope and Bluetooth to communicate through a mobile application and interacting with physical elements.

Keywords

Interactive toy Internet of Things Children with special needs STEM education 

Notes

Acknowlegements

This work was part supported by the OCDS funded project OCDS-CUD2016/08 of the University of Balearic Islands, together with the Institute of Blind and Deaf Children of Valle del Cauca and Institute Tobias Emanuel, Cali – Colombia.

References

  1. 1.
    Pequeños Científicos (Little Scientists) STEM-Colombia. http://www.pequenoscientificos.org. Accessed 11 Dec 2017
  2. 2.
    Moore, T., Stohlmann, M., Wang, H., Roehrig, G.: Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In: Purzer, S., Strobel, J., Cardella, M. (eds.) Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Research into Practice, pp. 35–60. Purdue Press, West Lafayette (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abell, S., Lederman, N.G.: Handbook of Research on Science Education. Lawrence Erlbaium Associates, New Jersey (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tsupros, N., Kohler, R., Hallinen, J.: STEM education: a project to identify the missing components, Intermediate Unit 1 and Carnegie Mellon, Pennsylvania (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Tai, R.H., Qi Liu, C., Maltese, A.V., Fan, X.: Planning early for careers in science. Science 312, 1143–1145 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hourcade, J.P.: Child-Computer Interaction. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, North Charleston (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Papert, S.: Teaching Children Thinking. Mathematics Teaching, no 58. Spring (1972)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Piaget, J., Bärbel, I.: The Psychology of Child. Basic Books, New York (1969)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Papert, S.: Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, New York (1980)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Resnick, M., Kafai, Y., Maeda, J.: A Networked, Media-Rich. Programming Environment to Enhance Technological Fluency at After-School Centers in Economically Disadvantaged Communities. Proposal to National Science Foundation (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scratch. Programming language online. http://www.scratch.mit.edu. Accessed 16 June 2018
  13. 13.
    Sullivan, A., Elkin, M., Bers, M.U.: KIBO robot demo: engaging young children in programming and engineering. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 418–421 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2771839.2771868
  14. 14.
    Bdeir, A., Ullich, T.: Electronics as material: LittleBits. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, pp. 341–344 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1517664.1517743
  15. 15.
    Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., Rodger, C.: Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. J. Eng. Educ. 97(3), 369–387 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carnevale, A., Smith, N., Melton, M.: STEM, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cano, S., Collazos, C., Fardoun, H.M., Alghazzawi, D.M., Albarakati, A.: Model based on learning needs of children with auditory impairment. In: Meiselwitz, G. (ed.) SCSM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9742, pp. 324–334. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39910-2_30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cano, S., Palta, A., Posso, F., Peñeñory, V.M.: Towards designing a serious game for literacy in children with moderate cognitive disability. In: Proceedings of the XVIII International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (Interacción 2017), Article 19, 5 pages. ACM, New York (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3123818.3123835
  19. 19.
    Pascual-Espada, J., Sanjuan-Martinez, O., G-Bustelo, B.C.P., Lovelle, J.M.C.: Virtual objects on the Internet of Things. Int. J. Interact. Multimed. Artif. Intell. 1(4) (2011).  https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2011.144
  20. 20.
    de la Guia, E., Camacho, V.L., Orozco-Barbosa, L., Brea Lujan, V.M., Penichet, V.M.R., Perez, M.L.: Introducing IoT and wearable technologies into task-based language learning for young children. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 9(4) (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2016.2557333
  21. 21.
    Brown, T.: Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. Harper Collins, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Florez-Aristizabal, L., Cano, S., Collazos, C., Moreira, F., Alghazzawi, D., Fardoun, H.: Tools and methods applied in interactive systems to evaluate the user experience with deaf/hard of hearing children. In: Conference: Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, TEEM (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3144826.3145365
  23. 23.
    Barendregt, W., Bekker, T.: Exploring the potential of the drawing intervention method for design and evaluation by young children. In: CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA 2013), pp. 193–198 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468392
  24. 24.
    Barendregt, W., Bekker, M.M., Baauw, E.: Development and evaluation of the problem identification picture cards method. Cogn. Technol. Work 10(2), 95–105 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-007-0066-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Solovieva, Y., Rojas, L.Q.: Método de formación de lectura para la corrección de dificultades en el desarrollo. Tesis de maestría en diagnóstico y rehabilitación neuropsicológica, Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, México (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cano, S., Alghazzawi, D.M., Arteaga, J.M., Fardoun, H.M., Collazos, C.A., Amador, V.B.: Applying the information search process model to analyze aspects in the design of serious games for children with hearing impairment. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 17(1), 83–95 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0520-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cano, S., Collazos, C.A., Aristizábal, L.F., Gonzalez, C.S., Moreira, F.: Towards a methodology for user experience assessment of serious games with children with cochlear implants. Telematics Inform. 35(4), 993–1004 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.011
  28. 28.
    Flórez Aristizábal, L., Cano, S., Collazos, C.A., Moreira, F., Alghazzawi, D.M., Fardoun, H.: Tools and methods applied in interactive system to evaluate the user experience with deaf/hard of hearing children. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3144826.3145365
  29. 29.
    MBOT, Robótica Educativa. http://www.makeblock.com/. Accessed 16 June 2018
  30. 30.
    Kara, N., Aydin, C.C., Cagiltay, K.: Investigating the activities of children toward a smart storytelling toy. Educ. Technol. Soc. 16(1), 28–43 (2013)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lampe, M., Hinske, S.: Integrating interactive learning experiences into augmented toy environments. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Pervasive Learning 2007, Toronto, pp. 1–9 (2007)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Portal Aragonés de la Comunicación Aumentativa y Alternativa, ARASAAC. www.arasaac.org. Accessed 16 June 2018
  33. 33.
    Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the ACM CH 1990, pp. 249–256 (1990)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Scholtz, J.: Evaluation methods for human-system performance of intelligent systems. In: Proceedings of PERMIS 2002 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad San Buenaventura CaliCaliColombia

Personalised recommendations