Advertisement

Influences on Academic Decision-Making in University Teaching: Perspectives from Policy, Literature, and Student-Centred Research

  • Leonie RowanEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores some of the ways in which academic decision-making can be shaped by engagement with three different sources of influence: policies that construct an environment within which staff performance is increasingly linked to student evaluations of teaching; literature that at once critiques the legitimacy of some forms of student evaluations and seeks to identify the factors that impact positively upon the student experience; and data collected directly from students concerning the ways they interpret the quality of their academic experiences. In exploring these related bodies of knowledge, the chapter seeks to identify recurring themes and patterns relating to factors that impact upon the engagement and satisfaction of diverse students without suggesting that these factors will always, and everywhere, lead to the same outcomes.

Keywords

Higher education pedagogy Social justice Student satisfaction Student engagement Student-centred learning Student evaluations of teaching Relationship-centred education Educational philosophy Quality university teaching Academic work Academic decision making First-year experience Influences on student satisfaction Rapport Pedagogical dexterity Curriculum relevance Intellectual challenge Assessment Engagement Fun in university teaching Communication Academic enthusiasm Respect 

References

  1. Appleton-Knapp, S., & Krentler, K. (2006). Measuring student expectations and their effects on satisfaction: The importance of managing student expectations. Journal of Marketing Education, 28(3), 254–264.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475306293359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arthur, L. (2009). From performativity to professionalism: Lecturers’ responses to student feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(4), 441–454.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510903050228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aspland, T. (2009). First year students’ perspectives of learning engagement: The centrality of responsivity. e-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 3(2), 29–40.Google Scholar
  4. Brennan, J., & Naidoo, R. (2008). Higher education and the achievement (and/or prevention) of equity and social justice. Higher Education, 56(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9127-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Delucchi, M. (2000). Don’t worry, be happy: Instructor likeability, student perceptions of learning, and teacher ratings in upper-level sociology courses. Teaching Sociology, 22(3), 220–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drew, S. (2001). Perceptions of what helps learn and develop in education. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(3), 309–331.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510120061197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans, C., Kandiko Howson, C., & Forsythe, A. (2018). Making sense of learning gain in higher education. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 1–45.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1508360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gruber, T., Reppel, A., & Voss, R. (2010). Understanding the characteristics of effective professors: The student’s perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 20(2), 175–190.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2010.526356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hill, Y., Lomas, L., & MacGregor, J. (2003). Students’ perceptions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(1), 15–20.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880310462047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hou, Y.-W., Lee, C.-W., & Gunzenhauser, M. G. (2017). Student evaluation of teaching as a disciplinary mechanism: A Foucauldian analysis. The Review of Higher Education, 40(3), 325–352.  https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2017.0011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hynes, M. (2017). Students-as-producers: Developing valuable student-centered research and learning opportunities. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 7(4), 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2017.1858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Iqbal, I. (2013). Academics’ resistance to summative peer review of teaching: Questionable rewards and the importance of student evaluations. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(5), 557–569.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.764863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kauffman, H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26507.
  14. Kazlauskas, A., & Robinson, K. (2012). Podcasts are not for everyone. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 321–330.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01164.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim, A. K., & Davies, J. (2014). A teacher’s perspective on student centred learning: Towards the development of best practice in an undergraduate tourism course. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 14, 6–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2013.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Larkin, K., Rowan, L., Garrick, B., & Beavis, C. (2016). Student perspectives on first year experience initiatives designed for pre-service teachers in their first weeks of university study. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 13(1). http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol13/iss1/7.
  17. Law, J., Afdal, G., Asdal, K., Lin, W., Moser, I., & Singleton, V. (2014). Modes of syncretism: Notes on noncoherence. Common Knowledge, 20(1), 172–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Magel, R. C., Doetkott, C., & Cao, L. (2017). A study of the relationship between gender, salary, and student ratings of instruction at a research university. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 10(1), 96–117.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19407882.2017.1285792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mayer, D., Dixon, M., Kline, J., Kostogriz, A., Moss, J., Rowan, L., …, White, S. (2017). Studying the effectiveness of teacher education: Early career teachers in diverse settings. Singapore: Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCabe, A., & O’Connor, U. (2014). Student-centred learning: The role and responsibility of the lecturer. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 350–359.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mello, L. V., Tregilgas, L., Cowley, G., Gupta, A., Makki, F., Jhutty, A., & Shanmugasundram, A. (2017). ‘Students-as-partners’ scheme enhances postgraduate students’ employability skills while addressing gaps in bioinformatics education. Higher Education Pedagogies, 2(1), 43–57.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2017.1339287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moore, S., & Kuol, N. (2007). Students evaluating teachers: Exploring the importance of faculty reaction to feedback on teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(1), 57–73.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251052000305534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nelson, K. (2014). The first year in higher education—Where to from here? The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 5(2), 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v5i2.243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nixon, E., Scullion, R., & Hearn, R. (2016). Her majesty the student: Marketised higher education and the narcissistic (dis)satisfactions of the student—Consumer. Studies in Higher Education, 43(6), 927–943.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1196353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rowan, L. (2013). “What price success?” The impact of the quest for “student satisfaction” on university academics. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 8(2), 136–150.  https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.2013.8.2.136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rowan, L., & Beavis, C. (2017). Serious outcomes from serious play: Teachers’ beliefs about assessment of games based learning in schools. In C. Beavis, M. Dezuanni, & J. O’Mara (Eds.), Serious play: Digital games, literacy and learning. Oxon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Rowan, L., & Grootenboer, P. (Eds.). (2017). Student engagement and educational rapport in higher education. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan and Springer Nature.Google Scholar
  28. Rowan, L., & Townend, G. (2017). No hugs required: University student perspectives on the relationship between excellent teaching and educational rapport. In L. Rowan & P. Grootenboer (Eds.), Student engagement and educational rapport in higher education. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan and Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scott, G. W. (2017). Active engagement with assessment and feedback can improve group-work outcomes and boost student confidence. Higher Education Pedagogies, 2(1), 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2017.1307692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Senior, R. M., Bartholomew, P., Soor, A., Shepperd, D., Bartholomew, N., & Senior, C. (2018). “The rules of engagement”: Student engagement and motivation to improve the quality of undergraduate learning. Frontiers in Education, 3(32).  https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00032.
  31. Sensoy, Ö., & DiAngelo, R. (2017). Is everyone really equal? An introduction to key concepts in social justice education (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  32. Shah, M., Nair, S., & Richardson, J. (2016). Measuring and enhancing the student experience. Sydney: Chandos Publishing and Elsevier.Google Scholar
  33. Tangney, S. (2014). Student-centred learning: A humanist perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(3), 266–275.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thomas, G., Martin, D., & Pleasants, K. (2011). Using self- and peer-assessment to enhance students’ future-learning in higher education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 8(1). https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol8/iss1/5.
  35. Tinto, V. (2003). Student success and the building of involving educational communities. Higher Education Monograph Series, Syracuse University, 2. Retrieved from http://www.marin.edu/WORD-PPT/PromotingStudentSuccess.pdf.
  36. Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/studentengagementliteraturereview_1.pdf.
  37. Winstone, N., & Parker, M. (2015). The role of students in pedagogical research projects: Subjects, participants, partners, consultants. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/role-students-pedagogical-research-projects-subjects-participants-partners-consultants.
  38. Wright, R. (2013). Student preferences for rapport-building traits on online instructors. Paper presented at the E-Learn 2013: World Conference on E-Learning, Las Vegas.Google Scholar
  39. Xiao, J., & Wilkins, S. (2015). The effects of lecturer commitment on student perceptions of teaching quality and student satisfaction in Chinese higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(1), 98–110.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2014.992092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education and Professional StudiesGriffith UniversityGold CoastAustralia

Personalised recommendations