The Problem of Representation and a Formal Solution
The chapter articulates weak and strong versions of the problem of representation. It also argues that enhancing the expressive power of logical systems does not result in a conclusive solution to the problem of representation. I examine structural realists’ reliance on ‘partial isomorphisms’ and ‘pragmatic truth’ to substantiate the message of this chapter. The message is that the set/model-theoretic framework cannot account for the biologically explicable relationship between the structure of the scientific theories and reality.
- Awodey, S., & Carus, A. (2009). From Wittgenstein’s prison to the boundless ocean: Carnap’s dream of logical syntax. In P. Wagner (Ed.), Carnap’s logical syntax of language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Carnap, R. (1934). The unity of science. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
- Carnap, R. (1937). The logical syntax of language (Edited by A. Smeaton, Trans.). London: Kegan Paul Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
- Carnap, R. (1942). Introduction to semantics: And formalization of logic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- French, S. (2014). The structure of the world: Metaphysics and representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684847.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Russell, B. (1927). The analysis of matter. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Vickers, P. (2008). Bohr’s theory of the atom: Content, closure and consistency. Philsci. Archive. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/4005/
- Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (Edited by C. K. Ogden, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Wittgenstein, L., McGuinness, B., Seekircher, M., & Unterkircher, A. (1993). Wittgenstein: Gesamtbriefwechsel (Complete Correspondence). Innsbrucker Electronic Edition (2nd release) (Electronic ed.). Charlottesville: InteLex Corporation. https://catalyst.library.jhu.edu/catalog/bib_4137611.