Autoethnography at Qalandiya

  • Ajnesh Prasad


This chapter situates the nexus between reflexivity and fieldwork through autoethnographic analysis. Specifically, drawing on psychoanalytic and postcolonial thought, this chapter utilizes introspective data from field research conducted in the occupied Palestinian territories to explore how Qalandiya—a neo-colonial militarized border crossing between Jerusalem, Israel and the West Bank’s twin cities of Ramallah and al-Bireh—came to significantly alter the researcher’s conceptions of self and Other. Drawing on first-hand experiences at Qalandiya—reconstructed through monologue style voice recordings, emails with colleagues, telephone conversations, personal diary entries, and memory—this chapter illuminates the discursive impact the field has upon the researcher’s self. Finally, this chapter concludes with a discussion of the ontological, the epistemological, and the ethical implications of pursuing research at neo-colonial sites in organization studies.


Autoethnography Border crossing Fieldwork Home Neo-colonialism Other Qalandiya Palestine Reflexivity Refugee 


  1. Ahmad, A. (2002). Israel’s colonial war. Frontline, 19(4). Retrieved from
  2. Alvesson, M., Ashcraft, K. L., & Thomas, R. (2008). Identity matters: Reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies. Organization, 15(5), 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Alvi, F., Prasad, A., & Segarra, P. (in press). The political embeddedness of entrepreneurship in extreme contexts: The case of the West Bank. Journal of Business Ethics.
  5. Amnesty International. (2011). Refugees in Canada. Amnesty International. Retrieved from who.php.
  6. Ansari, Z. (1999). Earth: Unforgettable. The Tech: Online Edition, 119(50). Retrieved from
  7. Arnaud, G. (2007). Poweract and organizational work: Gerard Mendel’s socio-psychoanalysis. Organization Studies, 28(3), 409–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashcraft, K. L. (1998). ‘I wouldn’t say I’m a feminist, but …’: Organizational micropractice and gender identity. Management Communication Quarterly, 11(4), 587–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Banerjee, S. B., & Linstead, S. (2000). Globalization, multiculturalism and other fictions: Colonialism for the new millennium? Organization, 8(4), 683–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baum, H. S. (1993). Organizational politics against organizational culture: A psychoanalytic perspective. In L. Hirschhorn & C. K. Barnett (Eds.), The psychodynamics of organizations (pp. 33–48). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (2002). The social construction of reality. In C. Calhoun, L. Gerteis, J. Moody, S. Pfaff, & I. Virk (Eds.), Contemporary sociological theory (pp. 42–50). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bradshaw, P., & Newell, S. (1998). Dreams of untenured female faculty: Exploring the deep structures of power. Canadian Woman Studies, 18(1), 123–127.Google Scholar
  15. Brewis, J. (2004). Refusing to be ‘me’. In R. Thomas, A. J. Mills, & J. Helms Mills (Eds.), Identity politics at work: Resisting gender, gendering resistance (pp. 23–39). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Brewis, J. (2005). Signing my life away? Research sex and organization. Organization, 12(4), 493–510.Google Scholar
  17. Brewis, J., & Wray-Bliss, E. (2008). Re-searching ethics: Towards a more reflexive critical management studies. Organization Studies, 29(12), 1521–1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carr, A., & Zanetti, L. A. (1999). Metatheorizing the dialectic of self and other: The psychodynamics in work organizations. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(2), 324–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Conquergood, D. (1991). Rethinking ethnography: Towards a critical cultural politics. Communication Monographs, 58(2), 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Derrida, J. (2000). Hospitality. Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities, 5(3), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Devereux, G. (1967). From anxiety to method in the behavioral sciences. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Engstrom, C. (2012). An autoethnographic account of prosaic entrepreneurship. Tamara: Journal of Critical Organization. Inquiry, 10(1), 41–54.Google Scholar
  23. Fotaki, M. (2006). Choice is yours: A psychodynamic exploration of health policymaking and its consequences for the English National Health Service. Human Relations, 59(12), 1711–1744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frenkel, M. (2008). The multinational corporation as a third space: Rethinking international management discourse on knowledge transfer through Homi Bhabha. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 924–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frenkel, M., & Shenhav, Y. (2006). From binarism back to hybridity: A postcolonial reading of management and organization studies. Organization Studies, 27(6), 855–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Geertz, C. (1991). Deep play: Notes on the Balinese cockfight. In C. Mukerji & M. Schudson (Eds.), Rethinking popular culture: Contemporary perspectives in cultural studies (pp. 239–277). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gregory, D. (2004). Palestine under siege. Antipode, 36(4), 601–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hall, C. S. (1958). A cognitive theory of dream symbols. In C. F. Reed & S. S. Tomkins (Eds.), Psychopathology: A source book (pp. 258–274). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hall, S. (1996). Who needs identity? In S. Hall & P. du Gay (Eds.), Questions in cultural identity (pp. 1–17). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Harding, N. (2008). The ‘I’, the ‘me’ and the ‘you know’: Identifying identities in organizations. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 3(1), 42–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Clegg, S. (2001). Reflexivity in organization and management theory: A study of the production of the research ‘subject’. Human Relations, 54(5), 531–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hatch, M. J. (1996). The role of the researcher: An analysis of narrative position in organization theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(4), 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jack, G., Westwood, R., Srinivas, N., & Sardar, Z. (2011). Deepening, broadening and re-asserting a postcolonial interrogative space in organization studies. Organization, 18(3), 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jung, C. G. (1969). The archetypes of the collective unconscious: The collective works of C. G. Jung (Vol. 9). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kenny, K. (2009). Heeding the stains: Lacan and organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(2), 214–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Khan, K. (2009). New York (movie).Google Scholar
  37. Khoury, T. A., & Prasad, A. (2016). Entrepreneurship amid concurrent institutional constraints in less developed countries. Business and Society, 55(7), 934–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mauthner, N. S., & Doucet, A. (2003). Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology, 37(3), 413–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Medford, K. (2006). Caught with a fake ID: Ethical questions about slippage in autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(5), 853–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mehta, D. (1998). Earth (movie).Google Scholar
  41. Morgan, G., & Smircich, L. (1980). The case for qualitative research. Academy of Management Review, 5(4), 491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nandy, A. (1983). The intimate enemy: Loss and recovery of self under colonialism. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Palestine Monitor. (2009). Factbook 2009: A reference guide for negotiators, policy makers, academics, and civil society actors on the one-year anniversary of the Annapolis Peace Process. Ramallah: Palestine Monitor.Google Scholar
  44. Patai, D. (1987). Ethical problems of personal narratives, or, who should eat the last piece of cake? International Journal of Oral History, 8(1), 5–27.Google Scholar
  45. Prasad, A. (2003). The gaze of the other: Postcolonial theory and organizational analysis. In A. Prasad (Ed.), Postcolonial theory and organizational analysis: A critical engagement (pp. 3–45). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Prasad, A. (2009). Contesting hegemony though genealogy: Foucault and cross cultural management research. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 9(3), 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prasad, A. (2012a). Beyond analytical dichotomies. Human Relations, 65(5), 567–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Prasad, A. (2012b). Working against the grain: Beyond Eurocentricism in organization studies. In A. Prasad (Ed.), Against the grain: Advances in postcolonial organization studies (pp. 13–31). Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
  49. Prasad, A. (2013). Playing the game and trying not to lose myself: A doctoral student’s perspective on the institutional pressures for research output. Organization, 20(6), 936–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Prus, R. (1996). Symbolic interaction and ethnographic research: Intersubjectivity and the study of human lived experience. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  51. Rabinowitz, D. (2002). Oriental othering and national identity: A review of early Israeli anthropological studies of Palestinians. Identities, 9(3), 305–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rauf, A. A., Prasad, A., & Ahmed, A. (in press). How does religion discipline the consumer subject? Negotiating the paradoxical tension between consumer desire and the social order. Journal of Marketing Management.
  53. Said, E. (2000). Palestinians under siege. London Review of Books, 22(24), 9–14.Google Scholar
  54. Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  55. Schwartz, H. S. (1989). Organizational disaster and organizational decay: The case of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 3(4), 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Turner, V. (1987). Betwixt and between the liminal period in rites of passage. In L. C. Mahdi, S. Foster, & L. Little (Eds.), Betwixt and between: Patterns of masculine and feminine initiation (pp. 3–19). Peru, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
  57. Vidaillet, B. (2007). Lacanian theory’s contribution to the study of workplace envy. Human Relations, 60(11), 1669–1700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Volkan, V. D. (2004). After the violence: The internal world and linking objects of a refugee family. In B. Sklarew, S. W. Twemlow, & S. M. Wilkinson (Eds.), Analysts in the trenches: Streets, schools, warzones (pp. 77–102). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  59. Wolfe, T. (1940). You can’t go home again. New York: Harper Brothers.Google Scholar
  60. Zureik, E. (2011). Colonialism, surveillance, and population control: Israel/Palestine. In E. Zureik, D. Lyon, & Y. Abu-Laban (Eds.), Surveillance and control in Israel/Palestine: Population, territory and power (pp. 3–46). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ajnesh Prasad
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Royal Roads UniversityVictoriaCanada
  2. 2.Tecnologico de MonterreyMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations