Advertisement

The First Moldovan Students in Romania (1990–1991): Informal Traders or Agents of Change?

  • Petru Negură
Chapter
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

Part of the first cohort (the academic year 1990–1991) of students from the Moldavian and Ukrainian Republics in Romania tried to obtain collateral benefits from the liberalization of border-crossing regimes to transport and trade various consumer goods. Engaging in “secondary economy” activities contradicted both the common expectations of student conduct and the idealist ethics, promoted by the official discourse of the communist regime, of personal austerity in favour of the presumed collective good. Once political regimes changed and old powers and ideologies lost their legitimacy, these informal activities acquired new social, moral, symbolic, ideological, and identity meanings. Adopting a behaviour and a discourse described as vicious at that time, the students belonging to this “active minority” helped reformulate in their own way those rigid models of practices and values (considered idealistic and/or ideologically manipulated) which lost their efficiency once the state suddenly loosened its “monopoly on legitimate violence” and individual freedoms thrived. This informal practice can be considered, in that specific socio-historical context, an act of innovation and a factor of change.

References

  1. Bataille, G. 1949. La Part maudite. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, H.S. 1997. Outsiders. Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Besançon, A. 1967. La Russie et ‘l’esprit du capitalisme. Cahiers du monde russe et soviétique 8 (4): 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bîzgu, T. 2006. Aspecte ale relaţiilor economice dintre Republica Moldova şi România. Scientific and Technical Bulletin. (Series: Social and Humanistic Sciences XII (9): 15–28.Google Scholar
  5. Burguière, A. 1994. Les rapports entre générations: un problème pour l’historien. Communications 59: 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caldwell, M. 2004. Not by Bread Alone. Social Support in the New Russia. Berkeley/Los-Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carey, H.F., ed. 2004. Romania Since 1989: Politics, Economics, and Society. New York/Toronto/Oxford: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  8. Chandler, A. 1998. Institutions of Isolation: Border Controls in the Soviet Union and Its Successor States, 1917–1993. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chelcea, L., and P. Lăţea. 2000. România profundă în comunism. Nemira: Bucharest.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2004. Cultura penuriei: bunuri, strategii şi practici de consum în România anilor ‘80’. In Viaţa cotidiană în comunism, ed. A. Neculau, 152–174. Iaşi: Polirom.Google Scholar
  11. Chiţu, I. B., and M. Bălăşescu. 2004. Analiza modificărilor structurale produse în comerţul internaţional al României după anul 1990. Comerţul românesc în faţa provocărilor secolului XXI (curs). http://www.biblioteca-digitala.ase.ro/biblioteca/pagina2.asp?id=cap10. Accessed 20 Feb 2011.
  12. Ciobanu, V., and B. Tirdea. 2013. Oligarkhicheskaia Moldova. Kishineu: Natsional’nyi Institut Razvitiia.Google Scholar
  13. Ciurea, C. 2016. Political Risks in Moldova: A Barrier to International Investments? In State Capture, Political Risks and International Business. Cases from Black Sea Region, ed. J. Leitner and H. Meissner, 120–136. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Descombes, V. 1999. Louis Dumont ou les outils de la tolérance. Esprit, Juin.Google Scholar
  15. Dumont, L. 1983. Essais sur l’individualisme. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  16. Durkheim, E. 1897. Le Suicide. Vol. 2.  https://doi.org/10.1522/cla.due.sui2. Accessed 27 Feb 2015.
  17. Fitzpatrick, Sh. 2005. Tear Off the Masks! Identity and Imposture in Twentieth-Century Russia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Frederiksen, M. 2015. The Last Honest Bandit: Transparency and Spectres of Illegality in the Republic of Georgia. In Ethnographies of Grey Zones in Eastern Europe: Relations, Borders and Invisibilities, ed. I. Harboe Knudsen and M. Frederiksen, 157–170. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  19. Goffman, E. 1963. Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Guyau, J.-M. (2012/1885). Esquisse d’une morale sans obligation ni sanction. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  21. Heintz, M. 2007. “Nothing Has Changed, It Just Turned Illegal”: Discourses for the Justification of Illegal Trade and Immigration in the Moldovan Republic. The Anthropology of East Europe Review: Central Europe, Eastern Europe and Eurasia 25 (1): 21–28.Google Scholar
  22. Humphrey, C. 1991. Icebergs’, Barter, and the Mafia in Provincial Russia. Anthropology Today 7 (2): 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Joyce, A. 2015. Good Neighbours and Bad Fences: Everyday Polish Trading Activities on the EU Border with Belarus. In Ethnographies of Grey Zones in Eastern Europe: Relations, Borders and Invisibilities, ed. I.H. Knudsen and M. Frederiksen, 75–88. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  24. Knudsen, I.H., and M. Frederiksen, eds. 2015. Ethnographies of Grey Zones in Eastern Europe. Relations, Borders and Invisibilities. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  25. Konstantinov, Y. 1996. Patterns of Reinterpretation: Trader-Tourism in the Balkans (Bulgaria) as a Picaresque Metaphorical Enactment of Post-Totalitarianism. American Ethnologist 23 (4): 762–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kornai, J. 1992. The Socialist System. The Political Economy of Communism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ledeneva, A.V. 1998. Russia’s Economy of Favours. Blat, Networking and Informal Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2006. How Russia Really Works. The Informal Practices that Shaped Post-Soviet Politics and Business. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mandel, R., and C. Humphrey, eds. 2002. Markets and Moralities. Ethnographies of Postsocialism. Oxford/New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  30. Merton, R.K. 1938. Social Structure and Anomie. American Sociological Review 3 (5): 672–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morris, J., and A. Polese, eds. 2015. Informal Economies in Post-Socialist Spaces: Practices, Institutions and Networks. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  32. Moscovici, S. 1991. Psychologie des minorités actives. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  33. Ogien, A. 2012. Sociologie de la déviance. Paris: PUF.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Orrù, M. 1998. L’anomie. Histoire et sens d’un concept. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  35. Osokina, E. 2001. Our Daily Bread: Socialist Distribution and the Art of Survival in Stalin’s Russia, 1927–1941. New York: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.Google Scholar
  36. Pesmen, D. 2000. Russia and Soul. An Exploration. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Pine, F. 1996. Redefining Women’s Work in Rural Poland. In After Socialism: Land Reform and Social Change in Eastern Europe, ed. R. Abrahams, 133–156. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2015. Living in the Grey Zones: When Ambiguity and Uncertainty are the Ordinary. In Ethnographies of Grey Zones in Eastern Europe: Relations, Borders and Invisibilities, ed. I.H. Knudsen and M. Frederiksen, 25–40. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  39. Polese, A. 2012. Who Has the Right to Forbid and Who to Trade? Making Sense of Illegality on the Polish-Ukrainian Border. In Subverting Borders: Doing Research on Smuggling and Small-Scale Trade, ed. B. Bruns and J. Miggelbring. Leipzig: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  40. Polese, A., Kovács, B. & Jancsics, D. 2018. Informality ‘in spite of’ or ‘beyond’ the state: some evidence from Hungary and Romania. European Societies 20 (2): 207–235.Google Scholar
  41. Rausing, S. 2002. Re-constructing the ‘Normal’: Identity and the Consumption of Western Goods in Estonia. In Markets and Moralities: Ethnographics of Postsocialism, ed. R. Mandel and C. Humphrey. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  42. Ries, N. 2002. “Honest Bandits” and “Warped People”: Russian Narratives About Money, Corruption and Moral Decay. In Ethnography in Unstable Places: Everyday Lives in Contexts of Dramatic Political Change, ed. C. Greenhouse, E. Mertz, and K.B. Warren, 276–316. Durham/London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rostas, Z., and A. Momoc. 2013. Bişniţari, descurcăreţi, supravieţuitori. Bucureşti: Curtea veche.Google Scholar
  44. Sampson, S.L. 1987. The Second Economy of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 493. (The Informal Economy): 120–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spitzer, A.B. 1973. The Historical Problem of Generations. The American Historical Review 78 (5): 1353–1385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stoica, V. 1991. Ai noştri tineri care la Bucureşti învaţă. Făclia. 26/07/1991: 14.Google Scholar
  47. Ţone, F. 2009. Bişniţarii Epocii de Aur. Adevărul (journal). Bucharest, September. http://www.adevarul.ro/dupa_20_de_ani/Bisnitarii-Epocii-Aur_0_109189148.html#comment. Accessed 15 Dec 2015.
  48. Verdery, K. 1996. What Was Socialism, and What Comes Next. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Verdery, K., and C. Humphrey, eds. 2004. Property in Question. Value Transformation in the Global Economy. Oxford/New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  50. Volkov, V. 2002. Violent Entrepreneurs. The Use of Force in the Making of Russian Capitalism. Ithaka/New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Weber, M. 2003. Économie et société. Vol. 1, 96–100. Paris: Pocket.Google Scholar
  52. Yükseker, D. 2004. Trust and Gender in a Transnational Market: The Public Culture of Laleli, Istanbul. Public Culture 16 (1): 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yurchak, A. 2002. Entrepreneurial Governmentality in Post-socialist Russia: A Cultural Investigation of Business Practices. In The New Entrepreneurs of Europe and Asia, ed. V.E. Bonnell and T.B. Gold. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  54. ———. 2002b. Muzhskaia ekonomika: “Ne do glupostei, kogda kar’eru kuesh’”. In O muzhe(N)stvennosti, ed. S. Ushakin, 245–268. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.Google Scholar
  55. ———. 2003. Russian Neoliberal: The Entrepreneurial Ethic and the Spirit of New Careerism. Russian Review 62 (1): 72–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhurzhenko, T. 2008. Zhenshchiny v chelnochnom biznese: mezhdu emansipatsiei i samoeksploatatsiei. In Gendernye rynki Ukrainy: Politicheskaia ekonomika natsionalnogo stroitelstva, 97–117. Vilnius: EGU.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petru Negură
    • 1
  1. 1.Free International University of Moldova, Centre for Sociology and Social PsychologyChișinăuMoldova

Personalised recommendations