Professional Training: Challenges in the Digital Economy Context

  • Tatiana Noskova
  • Tatiana Pavlova
  • Olga Yakovleva
Part of the Critical Studies of Education book series (CSOE, volume 10)


The paper covers the problem of changes in professional training that are demandable for the digital economy. The high level of country digitalization, detected by several indicators, is interpreted as a change of intellectual tools with transition from the use of signs to the use of sign systems. Challenges of digital economy are discussed in close relation with the psychological changes in all components of professional activity. New goals, needs, and motives in professional activities are considered as necessary requirements for innovative achievements. It is emphasized that the changes in professional activity should be dynamically reflected in professional training. The results of a study to assess educational conditions that academic teachers provide for students in the e-environment are presented. Three categories of educational conditions in the e-environment are explored: acquisition of learning content, network communication with learning goals, and self-management and self-realization in learning activity. It is concluded that training should occur within the e-environment that simulates trends of the real digital professional environment.


Digital economy Psychological theory of activity Professional activity Professional training Electronic educational environment Pedagogical support 



The research leading to these results has received, within the framework of the IRNet project, funding from the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013/ under REA grant agreement No: PIRSES-GA-2013-612536.


  1. Decree No. 203 of the President of the Russian Federation of 09.05.2017 “On the Strategy for the Development of the Information Society in the Russian Federation for 2017–2030”. Assessed 6 Aug 2018.
  2. Drlik, M., Morze, N., Noskova, T., Pavlova, T., & Yakovleva, O. (2016). Quality features of university information environment in its external indicators. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning., 26(2), 196–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jeong Chun Hai @ Ibrahim: Fundamental of Development Administration. (2007). Selangor: Scholar Press.Google Scholar
  4. Leontiev, A. N. (1975). Activity, consciousness, personality. Moscow: А.N. Leontiev.Google Scholar
  5. Negroponte, N. (1999). Being Digital. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  6. Noskova, T. N. (2007). Psychodactics of e-environment. St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
  7. Noskova, T. N. (2015). Pedagogy of the knowledge society. St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
  8. Noskova, T. N., & Laptev, V. V. (2016). Pedagogical activity in the electronic environment: Prospects for a new quality. Pedagogika. 10.Google Scholar
  9. Program “Digital Economy of the Russian Federation” Order of July 28, 2017 No. 1632-r, Moscow. Assessed 6 Aug 2018.
  10. Sberbank began to calculate the level of penetration of digital technologies into the lives of Russians. TASS. 2017. Assessed 6 Aug 2018.
  11. Scientific Output and Collaboration of European Universities / Labrosse I. et. al. (2013).Google Scholar
  12. Tikhomirov, O. K. (1984). Psychology of thinking. Moscow.Google Scholar
  13. Top 200 Tools for Learning. (2017). Assessed 6 Aug 2018.
  14. UN E-Gov Ranking. Ecquaria. Assessed 6 Aug 2018.
  15. Vygotsky, L. S. (1982). Collection of works: In 6 vol. T. 2: Problems of general psychology. Moscow: Pedagogika.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatiana Noskova
    • 1
  • Tatiana Pavlova
    • 1
  • Olga Yakovleva
    • 1
  1. 1.Herzen State Pedagogical University of RussiaSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations