Modernization of Environmental Education with the Use of Project-Based Learning, Outdoor Education, and Mobile Learning Supported by Information and Communication Technology

  • Imrich JakabEmail author
  • Martina Zigová
  • Zuzana Pucherová
Part of the Critical Studies of Education book series (CSOE, volume 10)


The paper proposes an innovative model of environmental education which combines mobile learning with student projects, outdoor education, and various information and communication technologies (ICTs), mainly the geographic information system and the global navigation satellite system. The aim of the model is to achieve modernization and efficiency of environmental education in the secondary education. Model design is based on the use of project-based learning, where students address the real problems working on projects, outdoor education moves part of the educational process to the exterior, and mobile learning allows the effective use of students’ mobile phones (smartphones). The global environmental problems were chosen as a main topic since they link abovementioned pedagogical principles and ICT and allow students a direct contact with the environmental problems occurring often in the immediate vicinity of the school or residence. The model gives students the opportunity for cooperation and confrontation of their ideas, planning their own activities, mapping, and self-learning but mainly active participation in solving environmental problems at a local level. Through the effective combination of different pedagogical approaches, the model has a strong potential to develop a wide range of additional knowledge, skills, and attitudes and increase student motivation to learn.


Environmental education Project-based learning Outdoor education Mobile learning ICT 



The research was supported by the projects VEGA 1/0608/16 and KEGA 025UKF-4/2015.


  1. Admiraal, W., Raessens, J., & Van Zeijts, H. (2007). Technology enhanced learning through mobile technology in secondary education. Expanding the knowledge economy. Issues, applications, case studies (Part 2), 1241–1248.Google Scholar
  2. AirNow [ONLINE] Available at: [2018-05-10].
  3. Al-Fahad, F. N. (2009). Students’ attitudes and perceptions towards the effectiveness of mobile learning in King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 111–119.Google Scholar
  4. Al-Khatib, I. A. (2009). Children’s perceptions and behavior with respect to glass littering in developing countries: A case study in Palestine’s Nablus district. Waste Management, 29(2009), 1434–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alsaadat, K. (2017). Mobile learning technologies. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 7(5), 2833–2837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, J. (2005). IT, E-learning and teacher development. International Education Journal, 5(5), 1–14.Google Scholar
  7. Arafat, H. A., Al-Khatib, I. A., Daoud, R., & Shwahneh, H. (2007). Influence of socioeconomic factors on street litter generation in the Middle East: Effects of education level, age, and type of residence. Waste Management and Research, 25, 363–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bannan, B., Peters, E., & Martinez, P. (2012). Mobile, inquiry-based learning and geological observation: An exploratory study. In Refining current practices in mobile and blended learning: New applications. Hershey: Information Science Reference,156 p.Google Scholar
  9. Bednarz, S. W. (2004). Geographic information systems: A tool to support geography and environmental education? GeoJournal, 60(2), 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bogner, F. X. (1999). Empirical evaluation of an educational conservation programme introduced in Swiss secondary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1169–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bogner, F. X., & Wiseman, M. (2004). Outdoor ecology education and pupils’ environmental perception in preservation and utilization. Science Education International, 15(1), 27–48.Google Scholar
  14. Boh, B. (1994). Environmental issues in secondary education. World Bank, 122 p. [ONLINE] Available at:
  15. Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1997). Children’s models of understanding of two major global environmental issues (ozone layer and greenhouse effect). Research in Science and Technological Education, 15(1), 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boyes, E., Stanisstreet, M., & Pui-ming Yeung, S. (2004). Air pollution: The knowledge and attitudes of secondary school students in Hong Kong. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 13(1), 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Braun, M., Buyer, R., & Randler, C. (2010). Cognitive and emotional evaluation of two educational outdoor programs dealing with non-native bird species. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(2), 151–168.Google Scholar
  18. Brown, K. (2010). Curriculum for excellence through outdoor learning. Learning and teaching Scotland, 28 p. [ONLINE] Available at:
  19. Callaway, R. M., & Aschehoug, E. T. (2000). Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: A mechanism for exotic invasion. Science, 290(5491), 521–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen, Y. S., Kao, T. C., Yu, G. J., & Sheu, J. P. (2004). A mobile butterfly-watching learning system for supporting independent learning. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE international workshop on wireless and mobile technologies in education, 2004 (pp. 11–18). IEEE.Google Scholar
  21. Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, J. C. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Computers and Education, 55(4), 1618–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Daehler, C. C. (2003). Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: Implications for conservation and restoration. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34(1), 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davis, N. E. & Tearle, P. (Eds.) (1999). A core curriculum for telematics in teacher training. Teleteaching 98 Conference, Vienna (1999) [ONLINE] Available at: Accessed 23 Nov 2003.
  24. Devine-Wright, P., Devine-Wright, H., & Fleming, P. (2004). Situational influences upon children’s beliefs about global warming and energy. Environmental Education Research, 10(4), 493–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dimitriou, A., & Christidou, V. (2007). Pupils’ understanding of air pollution. Journal of Biological Education, 42(1), 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dueker, K. J., & Kjerne, D. (1989). Multipurpose cadastre: Terms and definitions. In Proceedings of the Annual Convention of ACSM-ASPRS, American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, Bethesda, MD, 5 (pp. 94–103).Google Scholar
  27. Ekanayake, S., & Wishart, J. (2011). Identifying the potential of mobile phone cameras in science teaching and learning: A case study undertaken in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), 3(2), 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. El-Fadel, M., Findikakis, A. N., & Leckie, J. O. (1997). Environmental impacts of solid waste landfilling. Journal of Environmental Management, 50(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. EuropeAir [ONLINE] Available at: [2018-05-16].
  30. Finucane, P. M., Johnson, S. M., & Prideaux, D. J. (1998). Problem-based learning: Its rationale and efficacy. Medical Journal of Australia, 168(9), 445–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fullerton, D. & Kinnaman, T. C. (1994). Household demand for garbage and recycling collection with the start of a price per bag. National bureau of economic research, Working Paper No. 4670, 43 p. [ONLINE]. Available at:
  32. Gaible, E., Bloome, T., Schwartz, A., Hoopes, J. & Wayan, P. (2011). First principles: Designing effective education programs using Information and Communication Technology (ICT). [pdf] Available at: Accessed 02 Jan 2018.
  33. Gilbertson, K. (2006). Outdoor education: Methods and strategies. Champaign: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  34. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. In The handbook of blended learning (pp. 3–21).Google Scholar
  35. Grant, M. M. (2002). Getting a grip on project-based learning: Theory, cases and recommendations. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 5(1), 83.Google Scholar
  36. Gray, N. F., & Gray, R. O. (2004). Litter deposition on minor rural roads in Ireland. Municipal Engineer, 157(3), 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Guazzaroni, G. (2012). Emotional mapping of museum augmented places. Archeomatica, 3(3), 44–46.Google Scholar
  38. Hartley, B. L., Thompson, R. C., & Pahl, S. (2014). Marine litter education boosts children’s understanding and self-reported actions. Marine Pollution Bulletin (2014). [ONLINE] Available at: Scholar
  39. Hashemi, M., Azizinezhad, M., Najafi, V., & Nesari, A. J. (2011). What is mobile learning? Challenges and capabilities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2477–2481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoel, M. (1991). Global environmental problems: The effects of unilateral actions taken by one country. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 20(1), 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Huizenga, J. C., ten Dam, G. T. M., Voogt, J. M., & Admiraal, W. F. (2017). Teacher perceptions of the value of game-based learning in secondary education. Computers and Education, 110, 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ichinose, D., & Yamamoto, M. (2011). On the relationship between the provision of waste management service and illegal dumping. Resource and Energy Economics, 33(2011), 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ifegbesan, A. (2010). Exploring secondary school students’ understanding and practices of waste management in Ogun State, Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(2), 201–215.Google Scholar
  45. International Union for the Conservation of Nature, IUCN. (1970). International working meeting on environmental education in the school curriculum. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  46. Invasive Alien Species Europe [ONLINE] Available at: [2018-05-14].
  47. Ivy, T. G.-C., Road, K. S., Lee, C. K.-E., & Chuan, G. K. (1998). A survey of environmental knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of students in Singapore. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 7(3), 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jensen, B. B. (2002). Knowledge, action and pro-environmental behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Johansson, T. (2003). GIS in teacher education – Facilitating GIS applications in secondary school geography. [ONLINE] Available at:
  50. Kamarainen, A. M., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T., Browne, A., Mazzuca, D., Tutwiler, M. S., & Dede, C. (2013). EcoMOBILE: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips. Computers and Education, 68, 545–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kerski, J. J., Demirci, A., & Milson, A. J. (2013). The global landscape of GIS in secondary education. Journal of Geography, 112(6), 232–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kirschner, P., & Wopereis, I. G. (2003). Mindtools for teacher communities: A European perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 12(1), 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Klopfer, E., Sheldon, J., Perry, J., & Chen, V. H. (2012). Ubiquitous games for learning (UbiqGames): Weatherlings, a worked example. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(5), 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Korucu, A. T., & Alkan, A. (2011). Differences between M-learning (mobile learning) and e-learning, basic terminology and usage of M-learning in education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1925–1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. In R. Keith Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–333). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Kuhlemeier, H., Van Den Bergh, H., & Lagerweij, N. (1999). Environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior in Dutch secondary education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 30(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (Eds.). (2005). Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Landenberger, R. E., Warner, T. A., Ensign, T. I., & Nellis, M. D. (2006). Using remote sensing and GIS to teach inquiry-based spatial thinking skills: An example using the GLOBE program’s integrated Earth systems science. Geocarto International, 21(3), 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lappin, E. (1984). Outdoor education for behaviour disordered students. ERIC clearinghouse on rural education and small schools, Las Cruces, N. Mexico, 4 p. [ONLINE] Available at:
  60. Liu, S., & Zhu, X. (2008). Designing a structured and interactive learning environment based on GIS for secondary geography education. Journal of Geography, 107(1), 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Liu, Y., Bui, E. N., Chang, C. H., & Lossman, H. G. (2010). PBL-GIS in secondary geography education: Does it result in higher-order learning outcomes? Journal of Geography, 109(4), 150–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Livingstone, S. (2012). Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lowenstein, E., Martusewicz, R., & Voelker, L. (2010). Developing teachers’ capacity for ecojustice education and community-based learning. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(4), Education and the Environment (Fall 2010), 99–118.Google Scholar
  64. Makki, M. H., Abd-ed-Khalick, F., & Boujaoude, S. (2003). Lebanese secondary school students’ environmental knowledge and attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Marine Debris Tracker [ONLINE] Available at: [2018-05-16].
  66. Marine Litter Watch [ONLINE] Available at: [2018-05-08].
  67. Marriott, M. (2005). Use this phone to find a date. Or see videos. Or even talk. New York Times, July 4, 2005. [ONLINE] Available at:
  68. Marsh, D. (2012). Blended learning creating learning opportunities for language learners. Retrieved April, 20, p. 2015.Google Scholar
  69. McGreen, N. & Arnedillo-Sánchez, I. (2005). Mapping challenge: A case study in the use of mobile phones in collaborative, contextual learning. Mobile learning, 213–217.Google Scholar
  70. McKinney, M. L., & Lockwood, J. L. (1999). Biotic homogenization: A few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 450–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. McMichael, A. J., Friel, S., Nyong, A., & Corvalan, C. (2008). Global environmental change and health: Impacts, inequalities, and the health sector. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 336(7637), 191–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mergendoller, J. R., Markham, T., Ravitz, J., & Larmer, J. (2006). Pervasive management of project-based learning: Teachers as guides and facilitators. In Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 583–615). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, Inc.Google Scholar
  73. Mooney, H. A., & Cleland, E. E. (2001). The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(10), 5446–5451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Motiwalla, L. F. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers and Education, 49(3), 581–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Myers, G., Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (2004). School students’ ideas about air pollution: Knowledge and attitudes. Research in Science and Technological Education, 22(2), 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. New South Wales Environment Protection Authority (NSWEPA), 2018. [ONLINE] Available at:
  77. Ozdamli, F., & Cavus, N. (2011). Basic elements and characteristics of mobile learning. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 937–942.Google Scholar
  78. Palmberg, I. E., & Kuru, J. (2000). Outdoor activities as a basis for environmental responsibility. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4), 32–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pfligersdorffer, G. (1984). Empirische Untersuchung über Lerneffekte auf Biologieexkursionen. na.Google Scholar
  80. Priest, S. (1986). Redefining outdoor education: A matter of many relationships. The Journal of Environmental Education, 17(3), 13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Punter, P., Ochando-Pardo, M., & Garcia, J. (2011). Spanish secondary school students’ notions on the causes and consequences of climate change. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 447–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pyšek, P., Sádlo, J., & Mandák, B. (2002). Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia, 74(2), 97–186.Google Scholar
  83. Ramirez, M., & Althouse, P. (1995). Fresh thinking: GIS in environmental education. THE Journal (Technological Horizons In Education), 23(2), 87.Google Scholar
  84. Ramsey, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1992). Environmental education in the K-12 curriculum: Finding a niche. The Journal of Environmental Education, 23(2), 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Randler, C., Ilg, A., & Kern, J. (2005). Cognitive and emotional evaluation of an amphibian conservation program for elementary school students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 37(1), 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ravitz, J., Hixson, N., English, M., & Megendoller, J. (2012). Using project based learning to teach 21st century skills: Findings from a statewide initiative. PBL and 21st Century Skills, AERA – Vancouver, BC(2012).Google Scholar
  87. Richardson, D. M., Pyšek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M. G., Panetta, F. D., & West, C. J. (2000). Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: Concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions, 6(2), 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rose, J. (2009). Identifying and teaching children and young people with dyslexia and literacy difficulties: An independent report, 214 p. [ONLINE] Available at:
  89. Ruchter, M., Klar, B., & Geiger, W. (2010). Comparing the effects of mobile computers and traditional approaches in environmental education. Computers and Education, 54(4), 1054–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Santos, I. R., Friedrich, A. C., Wallner-Kersanach, M., & Fillmann, G. (2005). Influence of socio-economic characteristics of beach users on litter generation. Ocean and Coastal Management, 48(2005), 742–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sarrab, M., Elgamel, L., & Aldabbas, H. (2012). Mobile learning (m-learning) and educational environments. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, 3(4), 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Schipper, L., & Pelling, M. (2006). Disaster risk, climate change and international development: Scope for, and challenges to, integration. Disasters, 30(1), 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Selby, D. (2000). Global education as transformative education. Zeitschrift fuer internationale Bildungsforschung und Entwicklungspaedagogik, 23(3), 2–10.Google Scholar
  94. Sharples, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., Milrad, M., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile learning. In Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 233–249). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Shepardson, D. P., Niyogi, D., Choi, S., & Charusombat, U. (2009). Seventh grade students’ conceptions of global warming and climate change. Environmental Education Research, 15(5), 549–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Shobeiri, S. M., Omidvar, B., & Prahallada, N. N. (2007). A comperative study of environmental awareness among secondary school students in Iran and India. International Journal of Environment Research, 1(1), 28–34.Google Scholar
  97. So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. So, H. J., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Solomon, G. (2003). Project-based learning: A primer. Technology and Learning-Dayton, 23(6), 20–20.Google Scholar
  100. Stapp, W. B. (1969). The concept of environmental education. Environmental Education, 1(1), 30–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Starosta, B. (1990). “Erkundungen der belebten Natur nach dem Prinzip des entdeckenden Lernens-didaktische Konzepte und Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung [Discoveries in living nature according to the principle of learning by discovery: Didactic concepts and results of an empirical study]”. In W. Killermann, & L. Staeck (Eds.), Methoden des Biologieunterrichtes [Methods of biology education] (pp. 316–326). Köln: Aulis–Verlag.Google Scholar
  102. The National Education Programme of Slovakia. (2015). The National Institute for Education of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic. [ONLINE] Available at:
  103. Trash Out [ONLINE] Available at: [2018-04-28].
  104. UNESCO-UNEP International Environmental Education Programme. (1992). Environmental education activities for primary schools. [ONLINE] Available at:
  105. Uzunboylu, H., Cavus, N., & Ercag, E. (2009). Using mobile learning to increase environmental awareness. Computers and Education, 52(2), 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Verma, S., Verma, R. K., Singh, A., & Naik, N. S. (2012). Web-based GIS and desktop open source GIS software: An emerging innovative approach for water resources management. In Advances in computer science, engineering & applications (pp. 1061–1074). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Vesilind, P. A., Worrell, W. A., & Reinhart, D. R. (2002). Solid waste engineering. Forest Loadge Road, Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, 428 p.Google Scholar
  108. Vitousek, P. M., Antonio, C. M., Loope, L. L., & Westbrooks, R. (1996). Biological invasions as global environmental change. American Scientist, 84(5)., 468 p.Google Scholar
  109. Westbrooks, R. (1998). Invasive plants, changing the landscape of America: Fact book. Washington, DC: Federal Interagency Committee for the Management of Noxious and Exotic Weeds (FICMNEW), 109 p.Google Scholar
  110. Wiegand, P. (2001). Geographical information systems (GIS) in education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 10(1), 68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Williamson, M. (1996). Biological invasions (Vol. 15). Springer Science and Business Media. 244 p.Google Scholar
  112. Zigová, M., Pucherová, Z. & Jakab, I. (2018). Innovative model of environmental education in lower secondary education. DIVAI 2018 – The 12 th international scientific conference on distance learning in applied informatics. Conference proceedings Štúrovo, Slovakia May 2–4, 2018, 205–216.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imrich Jakab
    • 1
    Email author
  • Martina Zigová
    • 1
  • Zuzana Pucherová
    • 1
  1. 1.Constantine the Philosopher University in NitraNitraSlovakia

Personalised recommendations