Advertisement

From Face-to-Face Teaching to Online Tutoring: Challenges, Solutions and Perspectives

  • Iryna SekretEmail author
  • Soner Durmus
  • Melih Derya Gurer
  • Orhan Curaoglu
Chapter
Part of the Critical Studies of Education book series (CSOE, volume 10)

Abstract

The chapter reports on the results of the case study related to the implementation of online tutoring in one of the state universities in Turkey. The research is a qualitative study based on the free interview of the focus group of online tutors and ICT experts on their experiences and problems they faced during their first year of online tutoring to the university students. The problems identified were grouped in four clusters (a) technical, (b) managerial, (c) instructional and (d) psychological. Based on the findings, a complex of solutions have been suggested and being implemented into practice in order to enhance the quality of online tutoring in the framework of the formal university education. The main purpose of the enhancements is to raise the online tutors’ competences in ICT tools for online tutoring purposes and to reformat their teaching experience from the face-to-face mode of teaching to the specifics of online tutoring and communication mediated by appropriate ICT tools. Considering the results of the study, we developed an outline of skills and competences required for an online tutor and formulated principles of effective online tutoring. The results of the case study imply that the online tutor’s competences should include the areas of the pedagogy and methodology of online tutoring, strategies of online instruction and managing appropriate ICT tools.

Keywords

Online tutoring Higher education Face-to-Face teaching ICT tools Online tutor’s competences 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received, within the framework of the IRNet project, funding from the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013/under REA grant agreement No. PIRSES-GA-2013-612536.

References

  1. Arrizabalaga, P., Monguet, J. M., & Ferruzca, M. (2010). Supporting the online tutoring process through a personalized learning environment. Retrieved from http://pleconference.citilab.eu/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/ple2010_submission_65.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
  2. Benson, A. (2002). Using online learning to meet workforce demand: A case study of stakeholder influence. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(4), 443–452.Google Scholar
  3. Carliner, S. (2004). An overview of online learning (2nd ed.). Armherst: Human Resource Development Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cornelius, S., & Higgison, C. (2001). The tutor’s role and effective strategies for online tutoring. In Online tutoring e-Book. Retrieved from http://www.fredriley.org.uk/callhull/otis/t2-06.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
  5. Davies, C., et al. (2010). Research and development to support the next stage of the harnessing technology strategy, the learner and their context. The technology-based experiences of learners as they approach and enter the world of work: A report for Becta. Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Denard, H. (2003). E-tutoring and the transformations in online learning. Interactions, 7(2). Retrieved from http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/cap/resources/pubs/interactions/archive/issue20/denard. Accessed 3 Sep 2010.
  7. Flowers, A. T. (2007, January 1). NCLB spurs growth in online tutoring options. School Reform News. Chicago: The Heartland Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Gray, K., Annabell, L., & Kennedy, G. (2010). Medical students’ use of Facebook to support learning: Insights from four case studies. Medical Teacher, 32(12), 971–976.  https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.497826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guichon, N. (2009). Training future language teachers to develop online tutors’ competence through reflective analysis. ReCALL, 21(2), 166–185.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009000214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gümüş, S., & Okur, M. R. (2010). Using multimedia objects in online learning environment. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2010), 5157–5161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hawkridge, D., & Wheeler, M. (2010). Tutoring at a distance, online tutoring and tutoring in second life. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2010/Hawkridge_Wheeler.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2016.
  12. Khan, B. (2001). Web-based training. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Khan, B. (Ed.). (2005). Managing e-learning strategies: Design, delivery, implementation and evaluation. Hershey: Idea Group Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Marcelo, C., Puente, D., Ballesteros, M. A., & Palazón, A. (2002). E-Learning, Teleformación: Diseño, Desarrollo y Evaluación de la Formación a Través de Internet. Barcelona: Ediciones Gestión 2000.Google Scholar
  15. O’Hare, S. (2011). The role of the tutor in online learning. Proceedings of Ascilite 2011 Hobart. Retrieved from http://www.leishman-associates.com.au/ascilite2011/downloads/papers/O’Hare-full.pdf. Accessed 20 Jan 2016.
  16. Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Educating the next generation. EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2015.
  17. Regan, K., Evmenova, A., Baker, P., .Jerome, M.K., Spencer, V., Lawson, H. & Werner, T. (2012). Experiences of instructors in online learning environments: Identifying and regulating emotions, The Internet and Higher Education, 15 (3), 204-212,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Salmon, G., Ross, B., Pechenkina, E., & Chase, A. M. (2015). The space for social media in structured online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23.  https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.28507. Retrieved on January 10, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sekret, I. (2012a). Implementing ICT in a higher technical establishment: Institutional level. In Humanitarian bulletin – Annex 1 to Issue 27. Vol III (36): Thematic issue “Higher Education of Ukraine in the Context of its Integration to the European Educational Space”, Kyiv (pp. 185–193).Google Scholar
  20. Sekret, I. (2012b). Social media in learning. Wyźsza Szkola Humanistyczna Towarzystwa Wiedzy Powszechnej w Szczecinie/EDUKACJA HUMANISTYCZNA/Pόłrocznik myśli społeczno-pedagogicznej/Nr, 2(27), 179–188.Google Scholar
  21. Sekret, I. (2016). Problems, Experiences, and Perspectives of Implementing Social Media in Online Tutoring. In M. Turčáni, Z. Balogh, M. Munk, & Ĺ. Benko (Eds.), Proceedings “DIVAI 2016 11th International Scientific Conference on Distance Learning in Applied Informatics”(pp. 407–421). Štúrovo, Slovakia, May 2–4, 2016.Google Scholar
  22. Sekret, I., & Kommers, P. (2014). Conceptual issues of the digital competence development in the framework of the council of the European Union pp, 183–194 DIVAI 2014, The 10th international scientific conference on distance learning in applied informatics. ISBN: 978-80-7478-497-2.Google Scholar
  23. Sekret, I., & Williams, P. (2013). Social media in learning: A case of implementing Facebook in undergraduates’ learning. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, & Candel TorresI (Eds.), Edulearn 2013: Proceedings of 5th international conference on education and new learning technologies, 1–3 July (pp. 5198–5206), Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  24. Seoane, A. M., García, F. J., Bosom, Á., FernÁndez, E., & HernÁndez, M. J. (2007). Lifelong learning online tutoring methodology approach. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning (IJCEELL), 17(6), 479–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smyrnova-Trybulska, E., Morze, N., Pavlova, T., Kommers, P. A. M., & Sekret, I. (2017). Using effective and adequate IT tools for developing teachers’ skills. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning (IJCEELL), 27(3), 219–245.Google Scholar
  26. Tomei, L. A. (2006). The impact of online teaching on faculty load: Computing the ideal class size for online courses. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 531–541.Google Scholar
  27. Veletsianos, G., & Navarrete, C. (2012). Online social networks as formal learning environments: Learner experiences and activities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 144–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vlachopoulos, P. (2008). Reconceptualising e-moderation in asynchronous online discussions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Scotland: University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
  29. Williams, P., & Sekret, I. (2018). Implementation of social media for enhancing learning interactivity in formal education. Pedagogical Advances in Technology-Mediated Education, 1(1), 68–83. Retrieved from http://www.patme-iatels.com/index.php/patme/article/view/15.Google Scholar
  30. Yukselturk, E., & Curaoglu, O. (2010). Blended assessment methods in online educational programs in Turkey: Issues and strategies. In S. Mukerji & P. Tripathi (Eds.), Cases on transnational learning and technologically enabled environments.  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-749-7.ch018.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iryna Sekret
    • 1
    Email author
  • Soner Durmus
    • 2
  • Melih Derya Gurer
    • 2
  • Orhan Curaoglu
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Foreign LanguagesAbant Izzet Baysal UniversityBoluTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationAbant Izzet Baysal UniversityBoluTurkey

Personalised recommendations