Advertisement

Methodology for Assessing Blast Threat of EOD Personnel

  • Edyta KrzystałaEmail author
  • Krzysztof Kawlewski
  • Sławomir Kciuk
  • Grzegorz Bienioszek
  • Tomasz Machoczek
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

In the article, a methodology for assessing blast threat of Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) technicians was presented. During the research tests of controlled explosion were performed with the dummy mounted to simulate standing position. The response of the dummy against different improvised explosive materials with the charge of 75 g to 1000 g was performed. During the research an acceleration of the particular body part (head, pelvis, upper and lower limb) as well as pressure acting on the dummy was measured. The article deals with the protection of EOD technicians against such threats as an overpressure, a heat and shock wave. Results of the experimental research will be used to design and improve better personnel blast protection suits as well as educational materials for the future EOD technicians. Even when using a well characterized, widely available explosive, a mine explosion still exhibits an element of variability from one test to the next.

Keywords

Blast threat Human surrogate Bomb suit Blast protection 

References

  1. 1.
    Bowen IG, Fletcher ER, Richmond DR (1968) Estimate of Man’s tolerance to the direct effects of air blast, Technical Progress Report, DASA-2113, Defense Atomic Support Agency, Department of Defense, Washington, DC, October 1968Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bass C, Davis M, Rafaels K, “Steve” Rountree M, Harris RM, Sanderson E, Andrefsky W, DiMarco G, Zielinski M (2005) A methodology for assessing blast protection in explosive ordnance disposal bomb suits, Int J Occup Saf Ergon 11:347–361.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2005.11076655
  3. 3.
    Chichester C, Bass C, Boggess B, Davis M, Sanderson E, Di Marco G (2001) A test methodology for assessing demining personal protective equipment (PPE). Army Commun Command Fort Belvoir VaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kirkman E, Watts S, Cooper G (2011) Blast injury research models. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366:144–159.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0240Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Explosive Ordnance Disposal operations, Headquarters Department of the Army, December 2011, This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online (www.us.army.mil) and General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine Digital Library at www.train.army.mil
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Eiband M (1959) Human Tolerance to Rapidly Applied Accelerations: A Summary of the Literature, NASA Memo. 5-19-59E, pp 1–57Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    MIL-STD-662F 18 December 1997 Superseding, Department of Defense Test Method Standard, V50 Ballistic Test For ArmorGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    NATO STANAG 2920, Edition 7, Ballistic Test Method for Personal Armour Materials and Combat Clothing. 31 July 2003. Annex BGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patent PL 219525 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patent PL 221705 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Public Safety Personal Protective Equipment for Disposal of Explosive Devices System Assessment and Validation for Emergency Responders (SAVER) TechNote, April 2014Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pandelani T, Sono TJ, Reinecke JD, Nurick GN (2016) Impact loading response of the MiL-Lx leg fitted with combat boots. Int J Impact Eng 92:26–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.03.007Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Test Methodologies for Personal Protective Equipment Against Anti-Personnel Mine Blast RTO TECHNICAL REPORT TR-HFM-089, Final Report of the RTO Human Factors and Medicine Panel (HFM) Task Group TG-024, 2004Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang Y, Liou WW, Sheng J, Gorsich D, Arepally S (2013) Shock wave impact simulation of a vehicle occupant using fluid/structure/dynamics interactions. Int J Impact Eng 52:11–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.09.002Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edyta Krzystała
    • 1
    Email author
  • Krzysztof Kawlewski
    • 1
  • Sławomir Kciuk
    • 1
  • Grzegorz Bienioszek
    • 1
  • Tomasz Machoczek
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringSilesian University of TechnologyGliwicePoland

Personalised recommendations