Advertisement

Storytelling as a Liminal Space: Using a Narrative Based Participatory Approach to Tackle Cyberbullying Among Adolescents

  • Irene WhiteEmail author
  • Mairéad Foody
  • James O’Higgins Norman
Chapter

Abstract

Cyberbullying in the adolescent years can have a devastating impact on mental health and the social and emotional development of teens. Responses to the issue have been widespread. While many whole school programmes include elements such as role modelling, few interventions appear to use a participatory approach with adolescents. This chapter considers the use of narrative based participatory approaches that capture and utilise the student voice. It is suggested that these approaches be added as creative, complementary components of whole school anti-bullying programmes. Drawing on Turner’s concept of liminality and Boal’s Theatre of the Oppressed model, we propose a creative process that places the adolescent voice at the centre of anti-bullying initiatives and advocate for a return to the development of more bottom-up approaches to school-based interventions. In line with United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) Articles 12 and 13, we suggest that adopting a participatory approach that invites and supports adolescents to tell their own stories is an opportunity for schools to give voice to students and to consult them in making decisions about themselves. The practice of drawing on students’ own stories and personal accounts can have a cathartic and empowering effect on participants. We contend that such an approach may provide more powerful points of entry to discussions on cyberbullying, and ultimately a more transformative experience for participants, than that offered by approaches that preclude the student voice or by participatory approaches that require less creative input and less social and emotional investment.

References

  1. Atkinson, S., & Robson, M. (2012). Arts and health as a practice of liminality: Managing the spaces of transformation for social and emotional wellbeing with primary school children. Health & Place, 18, 1348–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baikie, K. A., & Wilhelm, K. (2005). Emotional and physical health benefits of expressive writing. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 11, 338–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baer, A. L., & Glasgow, J. N. (2008). Take the bullies to task: Using process drama to make a stand. The English Journal, 97(6), 79–86.Google Scholar
  4. Beale, A. V., & Scott, P. C. (2001). “Bullybusters”: Using drama to empower students to take a stand against bullying behavior. Professional School Counseling, 4(4), 300–305.Google Scholar
  5. Bhukhanwala, F. (2014). Theater of the oppressed in an after-school program: Middle school students’ perspectives on bullying and prevention. Middle School Journal, 46(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bigger, S. (2009). Victor Turner, liminality, and cultural performance. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 30(2), 209–212.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13617670903175238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boal, A. (2002). Games for actors and non-actors second edition (A. Jackson, Trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Boal, A. (2000). Theater of the oppressed. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bolton, G. M. (1992). New perspectives on classroom drama. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Simon & Schuster Education.Google Scholar
  10. Bolton, G., & Heathcote, D. (1999). So you want to use role play? A new approach in how to plan. Stoke on Trent, UK: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  11. Brecht, B. (1964). Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  12. Brooker, P. (2006). Key words in Brecht’s theory and practice of theatre. In P. Thomson & G. Sacks (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Brecht (2nd ed., pp. 209–224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burton, B. (2010). Dramatising the hidden hurt: Acting against covert bullying by adolescent girls. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 15(2), 255–270.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13569781003700151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burton, B., & O’Toole, J. (2009). Power in their hands: The outcomes of the acting against bullying research project. Applied Theatre Researcher/IDEA Journal, 10, 1–15.Google Scholar
  15. Carney, A. G., & Merrell, K. W. (2001). Bullying in schools perspectives on understanding and preventing an international problem. School Psychology International, 22(3), 364–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chandler, G. E. (1999). A creative writing program to enhance self-esteem and self-efficacy in adolescents. Journal of Child & Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 12(2), 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chandler, G. E. (2002). An evaluation of college and low-income youth writing together: Self-discovery and cultural connection. Issues in Comprehensive Paediatric Nursing, 25, 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chaux, E., Velasquez, A. M., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., & Scheithauer, H. (2016). Effects of the cyberbullying prevention program media heroes (Medienhelden) on traditional bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 42(2), 157–165.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coholic, D. A. (2011). Exploring the feasibility and benefits of arts-based mindfulness-based practices with young people in need: Aiming to improve aspects of self-awareness and resilience. Child Youth Care Forum, 40(4), 303–317.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-010-9139-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Newly betwixt and between: Revising liminality in the context of a teacher preparation program. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 37, 110–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Courtney, R. (1988). Aristotle’s legacy: Emotion as related to theatre and children. In A. Martin Smith & D. Booth (Eds.), Recognizing Richard Courtney: Selected writings on drama and education. Ontario, Canada: Pembroke.Google Scholar
  22. Cousin, G. (2006). An introduction to threshold concepts, Planet No 17, December 2006 (pp. 4–5). Retrieved July 19, 2017, from http://www.gees.ac.uk/planet/p17/gc.pdf.
  23. Curteis, I. (2010). Storytelling: The hindrance of holding a raw egg—Storytelling and the liminal space. Local-Global: Identity, Security, Community, 7, 150–162.Google Scholar
  24. Department of Education and Skills. (2013). Action plan on bullying. Report of the Anti-Bullying Working Group to the Minister for Education and Skills. Dublin: The Stationery Office. Retrieved from http://www.education.ie/servlet/blobservlet/tl_3rdlevel_accessreport.pdf.
  25. Donovan, L. (2005). Rehearsing life: Exploring alternatives and possibilities through theater. In Powell & Marcow-Speiser (Eds.), Little signs of hope: Art and social change. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  26. Elliott, B. (2011). Arts-based and narrative inquiry in liminal experience reveal platforming as basic social psychological process. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 38, 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Elmore, R. (2009). Schooling adolescents. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology. Contextual Influences on adolescent development (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 193–227). New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Fredland, N. M. (2010). Nurturing healthy relationships through a community-based interactive theater program. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 27(2), 107–118.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07370011003705013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed (New Revised 20th-Anniversay ed.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  30. Gleeson, H. (2014). The prevalence and impact of bullying linked to social media on the mental health and suicidal behaviour among young people. Dublin: Department of Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  31. Gourd, K. M., & Gourd, T. Y. (2011). Enacting democracy: Using forum theatre to confront bullying. Equity & Excellence in Education, 44(3), 403–419.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2011.589275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Graves, K. N., Frabutt, J. M., & Vigliano, D. (2007). Teaching conflict resolution skills to middle and high school students through interactive drama and role play. Journal of School Violence, 6(4), 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hawkins, S. T., & Georgakopolous, A. (2010). Dramatic problem solving: Transforming community conflict through performance in Costa Rica. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 2(1), 112–135.Google Scholar
  34. Heathcote, D. (1968). Role-taking. In L. Johnson & C. O’ Neill (Eds.) (1991) Dorothy Heathcote: Collected writings on education and drama (pp. 49–53). Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Heyward, P. (2010). Emotional engagement through drama: Strategies to assist learning through role-play. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 197–203.Google Scholar
  36. Howell, B. (2008). Literacy, subjectivity and the gender divide: The freedom of writing implies the freedom of the citizen’ (Sartre, 1948). Gender and Education, 20(5), 511–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson, C. (2001). Helping children to manage emotions which trigger agressive acts: An approach through drama in school. Early Child Development and Care, 166(1), 109–118.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443011660109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Joronen, K., Konu, A., Rankin, H. S., & Astedt-Kurki, P. (2012). An evaluation of a drama program to enhance social relationships and anti-bullying at elementary school: A controlled study. Health Promot Int, 27(1), 5–14.  https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dar012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Joronen, K., Rankin, S. H., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2008). School-based drama interventions in health promotion for children and adolescents: Systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 63(2), 116–131.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04634.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Land, R., Rattray, J. & Vivian, P. (2014). A closer look at liminality: The incorrigibles and threshold capital Threshold. Concepts from personal practice to communities of practice. In Proceeding of the National Academy’s Sixth Annual Conference and Fourth Biennial Threshold Concepts Conference (pp. 1–13).Google Scholar
  41. Leckey, J. (2011). The therapeutic effectiveness of creative activities on mental well-being: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 18, 501–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee, B. K., Patall, E. A., Cawthon, S. W., & Steingut, R. R. (2015). The effect of drama-based pedagogy on PreK–16 outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 85(1), 3–49.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314540477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lofgren, H., & Malm, B. (2005). Bridging the fields of drama and conflict management: Empowering students to handle conflicts through school-based programmes. Studia Psychologica et Paedagogica Series Altera CLXX. Malmo University, Sweden, School of Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  44. Lorenzi, F., & White, I. (2014). Evaluation of the fighting words creative writing model. Report available from https://fightingwords.ie/news/dcu-report-fighting-words-model.
  45. Madge, C., & O’Connor, H. (2005). Mothers in the making? Exploring liminality in cyber/space. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(1), 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mavroudis, N., & Bournelli, P. (2016). The role of drama in education in counteracting bullying in schools. Cogent Education, 3, 1233843. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1233843.  https://doi.org/10.1300/j202v06n04_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McLaren, P. L. (1988). The liminal servant and the ritual roots of critical pedagogy. Language Arts, 65(2) 164–179.Google Scholar
  48. Milsom, A., & Gallo, L. L. (2006). Bullying in middle schools: Prevention and intervention. Middle School Journal, 37(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moneta, I., & Rousseau, C. (2008). Emotional expression and regulation in a school-based drama workshop for immigrant adolescents with behavioral and learning difficulties. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 35(5), 329–340.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2008.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. O’Higgins Norman, J., & Connolly, J. (2011). Mimetic theory and scapegoating in the age of cyberbullying: The case of Phoebe Prince. Pastoral Care in Education, 29(4), 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. O’Higgins Norman, J., & Sullivan, K. (2018). Reducing bullying: A whole school approach. In H. Cowie & M. Campbell (Eds.), School bullying and mental health, risks, intervention and prevention. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. O’Moore, M., & Minton, S. (2009). Cyber-bullying: The Irish experience. In Q. Quinn & S. Tawse (Eds.), Handbook of aggressive behavior research. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  53. O’Toole, J., & Burton, B. (2005). Acting against conflict and bullying. The Brisbane DRACON project 1996–2004-emergent findings and outcomes. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 10(3), 269–283.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13569780500275873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ross, G., & Nelson, R. (2014). Using theater and drama interventions to reduce bullying in school-aged children. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 48(4).Google Scholar
  55. Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., & Voeten, M. (2005). Anti-bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3), 465–487.  https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X26011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schechner, R. (2003). Performance theory (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Scholes, L., & Nagel, M. C. (2012). Engaging the creative arts to meet the needs of twenty-first-century boys. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(10), 969–984.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2010.538863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., & Frisén, A. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Staricoff, R. L. (2004). Arts in health: A review of the medical literature. Research Report 36, Arts Council of England, London.Google Scholar
  60. Terry, C. M., & Cain, J. (2016). The emerging issue of digital empathy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thomassen, B. (2009). The uses and meanings of liminality. International Political Anthropology., 2, 5–27.Google Scholar
  62. Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2010). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Turner, V. (1964). Betwixt and between: The liminal period in Rites de Passage. In The Proceedings of the American Ethnological Society (1964). Symposium on New Approaches to the Study of Religion (pp. 4–20). Reprinted in: Lessa, W. A. & Vogt, E. Z. (1979). Reader in comparative religion: An anthropological approach (4th ed.). Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  64. Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  65. van Gennep, A. 1960 [1908]. The rites of passage (M. B. Vizedom & G. L. Caffee, English trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  66. Voight, A. (2015). Student voice for school-climate improvement: A case study of an urban middle school. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 25, 310–326.  https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weinstein, S. (2010). A unified poet alliance: The personal and social outcomes of youth spoken word poetry programming. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 11(2).Google Scholar
  68. Wels, H., van der Waal, K., Spiegel, A., & Kamsteeg, F. (2011) Victor Turner and liminality: An introduction. Anthropology Southern Africa, 34, 1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23323256.2011.11500002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. White, M. (2010). Developing guidelines for good practice in participatory arts-in-health-care contexts. Journal of Applied Arts and Health, 1(2), 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wright, J. (2002). Online counselling: Learning from writing therapy. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 30(3), 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wright, R., John, L., Ellenbogen, S., Offord, D. R., Duku, E. K., & Rowe, W. (2006). Effect of a structured arts program on the psychosocial functioning of youth from low-income communities. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 26(2), 186–205.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431605285717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irene White
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mairéad Foody
    • 1
  • James O’Higgins Norman
    • 1
  1. 1.National Anti-Bullying Research and Resource Centre, Dublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations