Generating Personal Stories on Negative Online Peer Interactions Through a Photo-Elicitation Method
The goal of this chapter is to evaluate the usability of photo-elicitation interviewing (PEI) to collect personal stories from adolescents about their experience of negative online peer interactions, such as cyberbullying. Within this field of research, most studies rely on quantitative data or qualitative data based on interviews and focus group discussions. In exploring the value of this alternative methodology, we first describe, based on previous research, the characteristics and use of PEI. In the second part, PEI’s usefulness is explored in terms of a study with 34 participants aged between 13 and 14 years old. The advantages and disadvantages of using this method are highlighted. The chapter concludes with concrete advice for future researchers wishing to use PEI within the field of negative online peer interactions.
- Allmark, P., Stevenson, K., & Stotzer, T. (2017, July 4–7). Having a voice and being heard: Photography and children’s communication through photovoice. In F. Martin & S. Jarvis (Eds.), Refereed proceedings of ANZCA2017 (Australian and New Zealand Communications Association Conference). Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
- Bannink, F. (2006). Oplossingsgerichte vragen. Handboek oplossingsgerichte gespreksvoering [Handbook of solution-oriented coversations]. Amsterdam: Harcourt Assessment BV.Google Scholar
- Bignante, E. (2010). The use of photo-elicitation in field research. EchoGéo, 11. https://doi.org/10.4000/echogeo.11622.
- Bridge, L. (2013). Seeing and telling households: A case for photo elicitation and graphic elicitation in qualitative research. Graduate Journal of Social Science, 10(2), 106–131.Google Scholar
- Hurworth, R. (2003). Photo-interviewing for research. Social Research Update, 40, 1–4.Google Scholar
- Loeffler, T. A. (2005). Looking deeply in: Using photo-elicitation to explore the meanings of outdoor education experiences. The Journal of Experiental Education, 27(3), 343–346.Google Scholar
- Maher, D. (2008). Cyberbullying: An ethnographic case study of one Australian upper primary school class. Youth Studies Australia, 27(4), 50–57.Google Scholar
- Marwick, A., & boyd, d. (2011). The drama! Teen conflict, gossip, and bullying in networked publics. Paper presented at Oxford Internet Institute’s “A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society” (pp. 1–25), Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- Miles, B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Pabian, S., Erreygers, S., Vandebosch, H., Van Royen, K., Dare, J., Costello, L., … & Cross, D. (2018). “Arguments online, but in school we always act normal”: The embeddedness of early adolescent negative peer interactions within the whole of their offline and online peer interactions. Children and Youth Services Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.01.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wegge, D., Vandebosch, H., Eggermont, S., Rossem, R. Van, & Walrave, M. (2016). Divergent perspectives: Exploring a multiple informant approach to cyberbullying victimization and perpetration. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 22(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-015-9287-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wiles, R., Prosser, J., Bagnoli, A, Clark, A., Davies, K., Holland, S., & Renold, E. (2008). Visual ethics: Ethical issues in visual research (NCRM Working Paper). n/a. (Unpublished).Google Scholar
- Willis, P. (1980). Notes on method. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies 1972–79 (pp. 88–95). London (United Kingdom): University of Birmingham.Google Scholar