Advertisement

Celebrities’ Experience with Cyberbullying: A Framing Analysis of Celebrity Stories in Online News Articles in Teen Magazines

  • Gaëlle OuvreinEmail author
  • Heidi Vandebosch
  • Charlotte J. S. De Backer
Chapter

Abstract

Seeking to increase knowledge about the content and underlying messages in news articles about celebrities’ experiences with cyberbullying, this chapter reports upon the results of a framing analysis. A total of N = 106 online articles were selected from two popular American celebrity teen magazines, Seventeen and Twist magazine. The analysis revealed 10 frames that could be classified within two themes. The first group of frames focused on celebrities’ experience of cyberbullying, citing its negative consequences and pointing to the uncontrollable character of the situation. In contrast, the second group of frames defended the idea that the situation could be handled by using the ‘right’ coping strategies. Suggested coping strategies were found on three levels: behavioral, cognitive and social. The dominant behavioral coping frame was that of ‘biting back’, representing celebrities fighting back against the bully by making sassy comments, a strategy that was also largely encouraged by journalists. On a cognitive level, celebrities strongly stressed the importance of a positive stand towards the cyberbullying experience, for instance by believing in positive outcomes associated with the ways the experience was handled. Finally, on a social level, looking for help was strongly encouraged, particularly if it was available nearby. The implications of this study are discussed in terms of their potential for supporting future anti-cyberbullying prevention and intervention initiatives.

References

  1. Adsprouts. (2017a). It’s fun to be Seventeen. Retrieved from http://justmediakits.com/mediakit/1273-seventeen.html.
  2. Adsprouts. (2017b). Twist Magazine is your source for the latest celeb news, coolest trends, hottest posters, hilarious reader confessions and more! Retrieved from http://justmediakits.com/mediakit/150-twist.html.
  3. Bastiaensens, S., Vandebosch, H., & Poels, K. (2019). Getting involved. Social and technological factors in adolescents’ third party responses to cyberbullying. In H. Vandebosch & L. Green (Eds.), Narratives in research and interventions on cyberbullying among young people. Belgium: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, C. S., Aubuchon, S. M., McKenna, T. P., Ruhl, S., & Simmons, S. (2014). Blurring personal health and public priorities: An analysis of celebrity health narratives in the public sphere. Health Communication, 29(3), 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.741668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, L. (2014). If we stick together we can do anything: Lady Gaga fandom, philanthropy and activism through social media. Celebrity Studies, 5(1–2), 138–152.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2013.813778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boon, S. D., & Lomore, C. D. (2001). Admirer-celebrity relationships among young adults: Explaining perceptions of celebrity influence on identity. Human Communication Research, 27, 432–465.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00788.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boykoff, M. T., & Goodman, M. K. (2009). Conspicuous redemption? Reflections on the promises and perils of the ‘celebritization’ of climate change. Geoforum, 40, 395–406.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chia, S., & Poo, Y. L. (2009). Media, celebrities, and fans: An examination of adolescents’ media usage and involvement with entertainment celebrities. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(1), 23–44.  https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900908600103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Claessens, N., & Van den Bulck, H. (2014). A severe case of disliking Bimbo Heidi, Scumbag Jesse and Bastard Tiger: Analysing celebrities’ online anti-fans. In S. Reijnders, K. Zwaan, & L. Duits (Eds.), The Ashgate research comparison to fan cultures. England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  10. Coulson, N. S., & Knibb, R. C. (2007). Coping with food allergy: Exploring the role of the online support group. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(1), 145–148.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, K., Randall, K. D., Ambrose, A., & Orand, M. (2015). ‘I was bullied too’: Stories of bullying and coping in an online community. Information, Communication & Society, 18(4), 357–375.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.952657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Esser, F. (1999). “Tabloidization” of news. A comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism. European Journal of Communication, 14(3), 291–324.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323199014003001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giles, D. C., & Maltby, J. (2004). The role of media figures in adolescent development: Relations between autonomy, attachment and interest in celebrities. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 813–822.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00154-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gould, M., Jamieson, P., & Romer, D. (2003). Media contagion and suicide among the young. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 1269–1284.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764202250670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gross, E. F., Juvonen, J., & Gable, S. L. (2002). Internet use and well-being in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 75–90.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haddon, L., & Stald, G. (2009). A comparative analysis of European press coverage of children and the internet. Journal of Children and Media, 3(4), 379–393.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17482790903233432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and human behavior, 22(3), 165–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holton, A., Lee, N., & Coleman, R. (2014). Commenting on health: A framing analysis of user comments in response to health articles online. Journal of Health Communication, 19, 825–837.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.837554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johansson, S. (2008). Gossip, sport and pretty girls. What does ‘trivial’ journalism mean to tabloid newspaper readers? Journalism Practice, 2(3), 402–413.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780802281131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jorge, A. (2015). Christiano Ronaldo is cheap chic, Twilight actors are special: Young audiences on celebrities, class and locality. Celebrity Studies, 6(1), 39–53.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2015.995467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Bullying experiences in cyberspace. The Journal of School Health, 78, 496–505.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1073–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. London: The Sage Commtext Series, Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  26. Larson, R. J., Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L. M., & Welch, H. G. (2005). Celebrity endorsements of cancer screening. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 97, 693–695.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  28. Mascheroni, G., Ponte, C., Garmendia, M., Garitaonandia, C., & Murru, M. F. (2010). Comparing media coverage of online risks for children in southern European countries: Italy, Portugal and Spain. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 6(1), 25–44.  https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.6.1.25/1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marwick, A., & Boyd, D. (2011). To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence, 17(2), 139–158.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856510394539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mishna, F., Saini, M., & Solomon, S. (2009). Ongoing and online: Children and youth’s perceptions of cyber bullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(12), 1222–1228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morey, Y., Eagle, L., Kemp, G., Jones, S., & Verne, J. (2011). Celebrities and celebrity culture: Role models for high-risk behavior or sources of credibility? In Paper presented at the 2nd World Non-Profit and Social Marketing Conference, Dublin, Ireland, 11–12 April 2011.Google Scholar
  32. Murray-Harvey, R., Skrzypiec, G. K., & Slee, P. (2012). Effective and ineffective coping with bullying strategies as assessed by informed professionals and their use by victimised students. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 22, 122–138.  https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2012.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Myrick, J. G. (2017). Public reactions to celebrity illness disclosures: A cognitive-emotional model of disclosure effects via prior wishful identification. In Paper presented at The International Communication Association (ICA) annual meeting, San Diego, May 2017.Google Scholar
  34. Ouvrein, G., Vandebosch, H., & De Backer, C. J. S. (2017). Celebrity critiquing: HOT or NOT? Teenage girls’ attitudes and responses to the practice of negative celebrity critiquing. Celebrity Studies, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2017.1307126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Panis, K., & Van den Bulck, H. (2012). Celebrities quest for a better world. Javnost—The Public: Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture, 19(3), 75–92.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2012.11009092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Perren, S., Corcoran, L., Cowie, H., Dehue, F., Garcia, D., McGuckin, C., … Vollink, T. (2012). Tackling cyberbullying: Review of empirical evidence regarding successful responses by students, parents and schools. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 6, 283-292.Google Scholar
  37. Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 281–307.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088705qp045oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Price, M., & Dalgleish, J. (2010). Cyberbullying: Experiences, impacts and coping strategies as described by Australian young people. Youth Studies Australia, 29, 51–59.Google Scholar
  39. Pyżalski, J. (2011). Electronic aggression among adolescents: An old house with a new facade (or even a number of houses). In C. Hällgren, E. Dunkels, & G.-M. Frånberg (Eds.), Youth culture and net culture: Online social practices (pp. 278–295). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Resnik, F., Bellmore, A., Xu, J. M., & Zhu, X. (2016). Celebrities emerge as advocates in tweets about bullying. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2(3), 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rojek, C. (2001). Celebrity. London: Reaktion Books, London.Google Scholar
  42. Ryalls, E. (2012). Demonizing “Mean Girls” in the news: Was Phoebe Prince bullied to death? Communication, Culture & Critique, 5(3), 463–481.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2012.01127.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seventeen. Kylie Jenner is doing a really amazing thing to help stop bullying on Instagram. Retrieved 1 September 2015, from http://www.seventeen.com/celebrity/news/a33651/kylie-jenner-is-doing-a-really-amazing-thing-to-help-stop-bulling-on-instagram/.
  44. Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2008). Fanning the flames of fan behavior: Celebrity worship, entertainment needs, and obsessive relational intrusion toward celebrities. In R. Meloy & L. Sheridan (Eds.), Stalking, threatening, and attacking public figures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Stack, S. (2005). Suicide in the media: A quantitative review of studies based on nonfictional stories. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 35, 121–133.  https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.35.2.121.62877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stavrositu, C. D., & Kim, J. (2015). All blogs are not created equal: The role of narrative formats and user-generated comments in healt prevention. Health Communication, 30, 485–495.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.867296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thelwall, M., Sud, P., & Vis, F. (2012). Commenting on YouTube video’s: from Gueatemalan rock to El Big Bang. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 616–629.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thom, K., Edwards, G., Nakarada-Kordic, I., McKenna, B., O’Brien, A., & Nairn, R. (2011). Suicide online: Portrayal of website-related suicide by the New Zealand media. New Media and Society, 13(8), 1355–1372.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811406521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Cleemput, K., DeSmet, A., Vandebosch, H., Bastiaensens, S., Poels, K., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2014). In systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of cyberbullying prevention programs. Wageningen, NL.Google Scholar
  51. Vandebosch, H., Simulioniene, R., Marczak, M., Vermeulen, A., & Bonetti, L. (2013). The role of the media. In P. K. Smith & G. Steffgen (Eds.), Cyberbullying through the new media: Findings from an international network (pp. 99–119). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  52. Van den Bulck, H., & Claessens, N. (2013). Guess who Tiger is having sex with now? Celebrity sex and the framing of the moral high ground. Celebrity Studies, 4(1), 46–57.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2012.750110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Gorp, B. (2005). Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press coverage of the asylum issue. European Journal of Communication, 20, 485–508.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105058253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Gorp, B. (2007). Het reconstrueren van frames via inductieve inhoudsanalyse: uitgangspunten en procedures. Kwalon 35, 12(2), 13–18.Google Scholar
  55. Vermeulen, J., & Vandebosch, H. (2014). Vlaamse krantenverslaggeving over cyberpesten. Tijdschrift voor communicatiewetenschap, 42(3), 286–304.  https://doi.org/10.5553/TCW/138469302014042003007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Williamson, M. (2010). Female celebrities and the media: the gendered denigration of the “ordinary” celebrity. Celebrity studies, 1(1), 118–120.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19392390903519149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. White, M., & Dorman, S. M. (2001). Receiving social support online: implications for health education. Health Education Research, 16(6), 693–707.  https://doi.org/10.1093/her/16.6.693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wong, D. S. W. (2004). School bullying and tackling strategies in Hong Kong. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 537–553.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X04263887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yoo, W. (2016). The influence of celebrity exemplars on college students’ smoking. Journal of American College Health, 64(1), 48–60.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2015.1074238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Young, R., Subramanian, R., Miles, S., Hinnant, A., & Andsager, J. L. (2016). Social representation of cyberbullying and adolescent suicide: A mixed-method analysis of news stories. Health Communication, 32(9), 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1214214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gaëlle Ouvrein
    • 1
    Email author
  • Heidi Vandebosch
    • 1
  • Charlotte J. S. De Backer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Communication StudiesResearch Group MIOS (Media, ICT, and Interpersonal Relations in Organisations and Society), University of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations