‘The Things You Didn’t Do’: Gender, Slut-Shaming, and the Need to Address Sexual Harassment in Narrative Resources Responding to Sexting and Cyberbullying

  • Amy Shields DobsonEmail author


This chapter reports on research examining young people’s understandings of gender roles in everyday digital cultures and communication technologies, and in relation to sexting practices. A cyber-safety narrative film that addresses sexting, cyberbullying, and digital citizenship was used as a springboard for focus group discussions with 24 young people in Victoria, Australia. The chapter outlines the key findings regarding how young people understood and explained common gender dynamics in relation to bullying, cyberbullying, and sexting, reflecting as they did in these discussions on both the gender relations depicted in commonly used cyber-safety narrative resources, as well as in their own social lives. The chapter describes a discussion that arose among female participants around the ‘slut’ label, concerns about the possibility for sexual rumours to be spread via digital social networks, and associated on- and offline harassment over sexual things they had not actually done. This discussion, it is argued, illustrates the way girls feel responsible for protecting themselves from the potential psychic injuries of the slut label through strict sexual self-regulation, knowing that they cannot control malevolent and frequent use of this label by peers on- and offline. Future narrative resources that seek to address sexting and cyberbullying need to more clearly identify and respond to sexual harassment and sexism as a persistent feature of young people’s digital and school cultures.


  1. ACMA (2012). Tagged top of the class. Retrieved from
  2. Albury, K., & Byron, P. (2014). Queering sexting and sexualisation. Media International Australia, 153(November), 138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albury, K., & Crawford, K. (2012). Sexting, consent and young people’s ethics: Beyond Megan’s Story. Continuum, 26(3), 463–473. Scholar
  4. Albury, K., Crawford, K., Byron, P., & Mathews, B. (2013). Young people and sexting in Australia: Ethics, representation and the law: ARC Centre for Creative Industries and Innovation/Journalism and Media Research Centre. Australia: University of New South Wales. Available online at Scholar
  5. Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, S. W., & Park, Y. J. (2014). Predictors of mobile sexting among teens: Toward a new explanatory framework. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(1), 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dobson, A. S. (2017) Sexting in context: understanding gendered sexual media practices beyond inherent ‘risk’ and ‘harm’. In E. Martellozzo & E. Jane, Cybercrime and its victims, Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Dobson, A. S. (2015). Postfeminist digital cultures: Femininity, social media, and self-representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dobson, A. S., & Ringrose, J. (2016). Sext education: Pedagogies of sex, gender and shame in the schoolyards of tagged and exposed. Sex Education, 16(1), 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drouin, M., Vogel, K. N., Surbey, A., & Stills, J. R. (2013). Let’s talk about sexting, baby: Computer-mediated sexual behaviors among young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A25–A30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gagnon, J., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
  12. Green, L., Brady, Ólafsson, Hartley, J., & Lumby, C. (2011). Risks and safety for Australian children on the internet CS 4(1), 2011: AU Kids Online (Vol. 4). Brisbane: ARC Centre for Creative Industries and Innovation, Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  13. Hasinoff, A. A. (2015). Sexting Panic: Rethinking Criminalization, Privacy, and Consent. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Karaian, L. (2014). Policing ‘sexting’: Responsibilization, respectability and sexual subjectivity in child protection/crime prevention responses to teenagers’ digital sexual expression. Theoretical Criminology, 18(3), 282–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lenhart, A. (2009). Teens and sexting: How and why minor teens are sending sexually suggestive nude or nearly nude images via text messaging. Washington: Pew.Google Scholar
  16. Lippman, J. R., & Campbell, S. W. (2014). Damned if you do, damned if you don’t…if you’re a girl: Relational and normative contexts of adolescent sexting in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 8(4), 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mitchell, K. J., Finkelhor, D., Jones, L. M., & Wolak, J. (2012). Prevalence and characteristics of youth sexting: A national study. Pediatrics, 129(1), 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mitchell, A., Kent, P., Heywood, W., Blackman, P., & Pitts, M. (2014). National survey of Australian secondary students and sexual heath 2013. La Trobe University Melbourne: Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society.Google Scholar
  19. May, R. (2013). Cybersexual violence series part 1: Amanda Todd and why we need to quit calling it (cyber)bullying. Retrieved from
  20. Powell, A., & Henry, N. (2014). Blurred lines? Responding to ‘Sexting’ and gender-based violence among young people. Children Australia, 39(02), 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ringrose, J. (2017). Position Paper #WABF2017: Addressing gender, power and conflict at school and online. Retrieved from
  22. Ringrose, J., & Eriksson Barajas, K. (2011). Gendered risks and opportunities? Exploring teen girls’ digitized sexual identities in postfeminist media contexts. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 7(2), 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ringrose, J., Gill, R., Livingstone, S., & Harvey, L. (2012). A qualitative study of children, young people and ‘sexting’: A report prepared for the NSPCC. London: NSPCC.Google Scholar
  24. Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14(3), 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salter, M. (2016). Privates in the online public: Sex(ting) and reputation on social media. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2723–2739. Scholar
  26. Salter, M., Crofts, T., & Lee, M. (2013). Beyond Criminalisation and responsibilisation: Sexting, gender and young people. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 24(3), 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Strassberg, D., McKinnon, R., Sustaíta, M., & Rullo, J. (2013). Sexting by high school students: An exploratory and descriptive study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(1), 15–21. Scholar
  28. Tallon, K., Choi, A., Keely, M., Elliott, J., & Maher, D. (2012). New voices new laws: School-age young people in New South Wales speak out about the criminal laws that apply to their online behaviour. NSW: National Children’s and Youth Law Centre.Google Scholar
  29. Temple, J., Paul, J., van den Berg, P., Le, V. D., McElhany, A., & Temple, B. (2012). Teen sexting and its association with sexual behaviors. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 166(9), 828–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Walker, S., Sanci, L., & Temple-Smith, M. (2013). Sexting: Young women’s and men’s views on its nature and origins. Journal of Adolescent Health. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Media, Creative Arts and Social InquiryCurtin UniversityBentleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations