Advertisement

Realistic Explorations in Astronomical Learning (REAL)

  • Jennifer Wilhelm
  • Ronald Wilhelm
  • Merryn Cole
Chapter

Abstract

Since the initial launch of REAL, we have implemented and researched its effectiveness with dozens of studies in over 20 middle schools in two states. We conducted professional development with 70 middle level science and/or mathematics teachers reaching more than 8000 students. These studies not only researched how students learned in a project-based instruction (PBI) environment but also compared gender differences in Earth/Space understandings. Control groups were also incorporated into our research design, and we examined differences in students’ learning by comparing the effects of business as usual (BAU) Earth/Space instruction with our PBI REAL unit. More recently we studied, at length, differences in teacher implementation (concerning the fidelity with which the curriculum was taught) and its effect on student learning outcomes (Lamar, Wilhelm, & Cole, 2018). One study examined how different gender groups and racial/ethnic groups performed on lunar content and spatial assessments within BAU and REAL classrooms (Wilhelm, Toland, & Cole, 2017).

References

  1. Baxter, J. (1989). Children's understanding of familiar astronomical events. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 502–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bodner, G. M., & Guay, R. B. (1997). The Purdue visualization of rotations test. The Chemical Educator, 2(4), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chéreau, F. (2010). Open source planetarium. [Computer Software]. http://stellarium.org/
  4. Cole, M., Cohen, C., Wilhelm, J., & Lindell, R. (2018). Spatial thinking in astronomy education research. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 010139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cole, M., Wilhelm, J., & Yang, H. (2015). Student Moon observations and spatial-scientific reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1815–1833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Paor, D., Dordevic, M., Karabinos, P., Burgin, S., Coba, F., & Whitmeyer, S. (2017). Exploring the reasons for the seasons using Google Earth, 3D models, and Plots. International Journal of Digital Earth, 10(6), 582–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fanetti, T. M. (2001). The relationships of scale concepts on college age students' misconceptions about the cause of the lunar phases (Master's thesis, Iowa State University).Google Scholar
  8. Fox Network Video (2001). Conspiracy theory: Did we land on the Moon? Nash Entertainment, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. Glandon, S. (2000). Caldecott connections to science. Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  10. Lamar, M. F., Wilhelm, J. A., & Cole, M. (2018). A mixed methods comparison of teachers' lunar modeling lesson implementation and student learning outcomes. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(1), 108–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lindell, R. S., & Olsen, J. P. (2002, August). Developing the lunar phases concept inventory. In Proceedings of the 2002 Physics Education Research Conference. New York: PERC Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. McGraw-Hill Education. (2018). Geometry Visualization sketchpad. [Computer Software]. http://www.dynamicgeometry.com/
  13. Mulholland, J., & Ginns, I. (2008). College MOON project Australia: Preservice teachers learning about the Moon’s phases. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards. For states, by states. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  15. Plummer, J. D., Bower, C. A., & Liben, L. S. (2016). The role of perspective taking in how children connect reference frames when explaining astronomical phenomena. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 345–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Polman, J. L. (2000). Designing Project-Based Science: Connecting Learners through Guided Inquiry. Ways of Knowing in Science Series. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  17. Russey, C., Wilhelm, J., & Jackson, C. (2013). Middle school students’ mathematical comprehension of latitude and longitude. Proceedings of the Thirty-fifth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, PME-NA – Chicago, IL, (November 14–17, 2013).Google Scholar
  18. Thurber, J. (1998). Many Moons. San Diego: Harcourt Brace International.Google Scholar
  19. Venville, G. J., Louisell, R. D., & Wilhelm, J. A. (2012). Young children’s knowledge about the Moon: A complex dynamic system. Research in Science Education, 42(4), 729–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wilhelm, J. (2009). Gender differences in lunar-related scientific and mathematical understandings. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 2105–2122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wilhelm, J. A. (2014). Young children do not hold the classic Earth's shadow misconception to explain lunar phases. School Science and Mathematics, 114(7), 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilhelm, J., Cameron, S., Cole, M., & Pardee, R. (2015). Using professional noticing to address middle level students' alternative conceptions of lunar phases. Science Scope, 39(1), 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wilhelm, J., Cole, M., Cohen, C., & Lindell, R. (2018). How middle level science teachers visualize and translate motion, scale, and geometric space of the Earth-Mon-Sun system with their students. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14, 010150.Google Scholar
  24. Wilhelm, J., Ganesh, B., Sherrod, S., Ji, J. (2007). Geometric spatial assessment. Assessment developed at Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.Google Scholar
  25. Wilhelm, J., Jackson, C., Sullivan, A., & Wilhelm, R. (2013). Examining differences between preteen groups’ spatial-scientific understandings: A quasi-experimental study. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(5), 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilhelm, J., Toland, M., & Cole, M. (2017). Evaluating middle school students’ spatial-scientific performance within Earth/space astronomy in terms of gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 3(1), 40–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zeilik, M., & Bisard, W. (2000). Conceptual change in introductory-level astronomy courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29(4), 229.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Wilhelm
    • 1
  • Ronald Wilhelm
    • 2
  • Merryn Cole
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of STEM EducationUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Physics & AstronomyUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Teaching and LearningUniversity of Nevada Las VegasLas VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations