Advertisement

Agri-tech Opportunities at the Bottom of the Pyramid: How Big Is the Opportunity and How Little Has Been Exploited? Some Selected Cases in Nigeria

  • Ali Muhammad Garba
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies of Entrepreneurship in Africa book series (PSEA)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the slow pace at which technology has been applied, particularly digital technology, in farming. The chapter examines the rice value chain in the context of new government policy that supports local rice production through the supply of credit and banning the importation of rice across land borders. The recent recession, which led to currency devaluation, also made rice importation difficult and provided opportunities for local producers and processors to fill the demand gap. This chapter explores the stages of rice processing and how new investors are focusing on and applying technology in selected stages to benefit from the new opportunities. The chapter presents two case studies of firms that typify this development and the changes happening at this level that are reshaping the entire value chain, thereby opening up other opportunities and possibilities. The chapter concludes with some recommendations on possible areas that represent opportunities for the application of digital technology.

Keywords

Agri-tech Rice production Policy Nigeria 

References

  1. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  2. Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  3. Collins, J., & Hansen, M. T. (2011). Great by Choice. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  4. Covin, J. G., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2011). Entrepreneurial Orientation Theory and Research: Reflections on a Needed Construct. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1042(1), 855–872.Google Scholar
  5. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behaviour. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 16, 7–25.Google Scholar
  6. ECOWAS Rice Factbook. (2018). Grow Africa.Google Scholar
  7. Garba, A. M., Ibrahim, M. A., Gorondutse, A. H., & Abubakar, A. A. (2018). Entrepreneurial Orientation: An Extended Model. International Journal of Organizational and Business Excellence (IJOBE), 3(1), 52–64.Google Scholar
  8. Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN) Report. (2017). United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Services.Google Scholar
  9. Gudmundsson, S. V., & Lechner, C. (2014). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Firm Strategy and Small Firm Performance. International Small Business Journal, 32(1), 36–60.Google Scholar
  10. Gupta, V. K., & Gupta, A. J. (2015). Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance in Large Organizations Over Time. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 13, 7–27.Google Scholar
  11. Hamel, G. (2007). Future of Management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  12. Helfat, C., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Katsina State Agriculture Restoration Project. (2016). Katsina Government Printers.Google Scholar
  14. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Miller, D. (1983). The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms. Management Science, 29(1), 770–791.Google Scholar
  16. Pearce, J. A., & Robinson, B. R. (2011). Strategic Management. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
  17. Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H., Jr. (1982). In Search of Excellence. Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  18. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analysing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  19. Pratono, A. H. (2016). Strategic Orientation and Information Technological Turbulence Contingency Perspective in SMEs. Business Process Management Journal, 22(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
  20. Punch Newspaper (2018, February 15). Anchor Borrowers’ Scheme: CBN Disburses N55bn to Farmers.Google Scholar
  21. Ridderstrale, J., & Nordstrom, K. (2007). Funky Business Forever. Stockholm: Book House Publishing/FT Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Shehu, B., & Lolo, A. (2017). Promoting Rice Productivity in Kebbi State: Linking Data and Policy. State Policy Note 2, June 2017. Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Nigeria Agricultural Policy Project FEED the FUTURE (The US Government’s Global and Food Security Initiatives).Google Scholar
  23. Thomke, S. H. (2003). Experimentation Matters. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  24. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of Field (2nd ed.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  25. WAAPP-Nigeria. (n.d.). Rice Production, Processing, Utilisation and Marketing in Nigeria. Extension Bulletin No. 230.Google Scholar
  26. Wiersema, F. (1996). Customer Intimacy: Pick Your Partners, Shape Your Culture, Win Together. London: Harper Collins Business.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Muhammad Garba
    • 1
  1. 1.Dangote Business School, Bayero UniversityKanoNigeria

Personalised recommendations