Advertisement

Large-Eddy Simulation of an Open Channel Flow with Submerged Rigid Vegetation

  • A. MontiEmail author
  • M. Omidyeganeh
  • A. Pinelli
Conference paper
Part of the ERCOFTAC Series book series (ERCO, volume 25)

Abstract

Flexible slender structures embedded in fluid flows are everywhere. Hairy surfaces are abundant in nature and perform multiple functions: e.g. thermal regulation, water harvesting, flow sensing, transport of species. While a great deal is known about the interplay between individual fibres and fluid flows, considerably less work has been done on flows interacting with ensembles of fibres, such as fur, hair, feathers or vegetation canopies. The particular case of vegetative canopies in river flows represents a paradigmatic example of the wide range of possible interactions between flows and ensembles of slender elements and how nature or human intervention can exploit this interplay to either mitigate disruptive events or to enhance the efficiency of a number of transport processes highlighting the importance of canopy-flow interactions on societal and environmental issues and the advantages that can be achieved by properly managing their reciprocal action.

References

  1. 1.
    Bailey, B.N., Stoll, R.: Turbulence in sparse, organized vegetative canopies: a large-eddy simulation study. Bound Layer Meteorol. 147(3), 369–400 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bailey, B.N., Stoll, R.: The creation and evolution of coherent structures in plant canopy flows and their role in turbulent transport. J. Fluid Mech. 789, 425–460 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Favier, J., Revell, A., Pinelli, A.: A Lattice Boltzmann-Immersed Boundary method to simulate the fluid interaction with moving and slender flexible objects. J. Comput. Phys. 261, 145–161 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghisalberti, M., Nepf, H.M.: The limited growth of vegetated shear layers. Water Resour. Res. 40(7) (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hutchins, N., Marusic, I.: Evidence of very long meandering features in the logarithmic region of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 1–28 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jiménez, J., Uhlmann, M., Pinelli, A., Kawahara, G.: Turbulent shear flow over active and passive porous surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 442, 89–117 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nepf, H.M.: Flow and transport in regions with aquatic vegetation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44, 123–142 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Omidyeganeh, M., Piomelli, U.: Large-eddy simulation of three-dimensional dunes in a steady, unidirectional flow II. Flow structures. J. Fluid Mech. 734, 509–534 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ong, L., Wallace, J.M.: Joint probability density analysis of the structure and dynamics of the vorticity field of a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 367, 291–328 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ree, W.O., Palmer, V.J.: Flow of water in channels protected by vegetative linings (No. 967). United States Department of Agriculture (1949)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rouhi, A., Piomelli, U., Geurts, B.J.: Dynamic subfilter-scale stress model for large-eddy simulations. Phys. Rev. Fluids. 1(4), 044401 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations