Eddy Resolving Simulations of Intake Under Crosswinds

  • N. R. VadlamaniEmail author
  • P. G. Tucker
Conference paper
Part of the ERCOFTAC Series book series (ERCO, volume 25)


Modern aircraft engine designs with higher bypass ratio and lower fan pressure ratio offer significant fuel burn benefits of upto 25%. To compensate for the additional increase in the drag and weight, relatively shorter intakes and nacelles are employed. However, shorter intakes suffer under off-design conditions of high incidence and crosswinds. The flow experiences severe acceleration around the intake lip, relaminarization, flow separation and transition to turbulence. Using eddy resolving simulations, the current paper aims to capture the flow over the intake lip under crosswinds and further explore effects of the Reynolds number.



This project was funded by Innovate UK. Additional support from St. Catharine’s college, Cambridge through the Bowring research fellowship is gratefully acknowledged. Simulations are performed on UK Supercomputer ARCHER, to which access was granted through UK Turbulence consortium (EP/L000261/1) and via the EPSRC RAP call of spring 2017.


  1. 1.
    Peters, A., Spakovszky, Z.S., Lord, W.K., Rose, B.: Ultrashort nacelles for low fan pressure ratio propulsors. J. Turbomach. 137(2), 021001 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cao, T., Vadlamani, N.R., Tucker, P.G., Smith, A.R., Slaby, M., Sheaf, C.T.: Fan-intake interaction under high incidence. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 139(4), 041204 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wakelam, C.T., Hynes, T.P., Hodson, H.P., Evans, S.W., Chanez, P.: Separation control for aeroengine intakes, part 1: low-speed investigation of control strategies. J. Propuls. Power 28(4), 758–765 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Matsuura, K., Kato, C.: Large-eddy simulation of compressible transitional flows in a low-pressure turbine cascade. AIAA J. 45(2), 442–457 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rizzetta, D.P., Visbal, M.R., Morgan, P.E.: A high-order compact finite-difference scheme for large-eddy simulation of active flow control. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 44(6), 397–426 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vadlamani, N.R., Tucker, P.G., Durbin, P.: Distributed roughness effects on transitional and turbulent boundary layers. Flow Turbul. Combust. 100(3), 627–649 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crompton, M.J., Barrett, R.V.: Investigation of the separation bubble formed behind the sharp leading edge of a flat plate at incidence. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G: J. Aerosp. Eng. 214(3), 157–176 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Deparment of EngineeringCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations