Advertisement

Numerical Study of the Flow Around \(25^{\circ }\) Ahmed Bodies with Hybrid Turbulence Models

  • F. DelassauxEmail author
  • I. Mortazavi
  • V. Herbert
  • C. Ribes
Conference paper
Part of the ERCOFTAC Series book series (ERCO, volume 25)

Abstract

The aim of this work is to explore the efficiency of different improved Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and hybrid LES/RANS approaches to study the external aerodynamics related to ground vehicles. These computational techniques should be able to build a bridge between accuracy and robustness in order to compute complex high Reynolds number bluff-body flows like ground vehicle flows. Bluff body flows are characterized by separated regions, containing wide spectra of turbulent scales. These regions, especially in the wake behind the body, are responsible for the main part of the drag forces. An accurate computation of these areas is a difficult task.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmed, S.R., Ramm, R., Faltin, G.: Some salient features of the time-averaged ground vehicle wake. SAE Tech. Pap. Ser. No. 840300. Detroit (1984)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, Release 17.0 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ashton, N., West, A., Lardeau, S., Revell, A.: Assessment of RANS and DES methods for realistic automotive models. Comput. Fluids 128, 1–15 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delassaux, F., Mortazavi, I., Herbert, V., Ribes, C.: Comparison of three hybrid turbulence models for the flow around a 25 Ahmed body. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on 6th Hybrid RANS-LES Methods. Strasbourg, France (2017). (Will be published)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guilmineau, E., Deng, G.B., Leroyer, A., Queutey, P., Visonneau, M., Wackers, J.: Assessment of hybrid RANS-LES formulations for flow simulation around the Ahmed body. Comput. Fluids (2017). (Article in Press)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Menter, F.R.: Zonal two equation k-\(\varepsilon \) turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Pap. 2906 (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Menter, F.R., Egorov, Y.: The scale-adaptive simulation method for unsteady turbulent flow predictions. Part 1: theory and model description. Flow Turbul. Combust. 85(1), 113–138 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rossitto, G., Sicot, C., Ferrand, V., Bore, J., Harambat, F.: Influence of afterbody rounding on the pressure distribution over a fastback vehicle. Exp. Fluids 57(43) (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sagaut, P.: Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows: An Introduction. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spalart, P.R., Deck, S., Shur, M., Squires, K.D., Strelets, M., Travin, A.: A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 20, 181–195 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Delassaux
    • 1
    Email author
  • I. Mortazavi
    • 1
  • V. Herbert
    • 2
  • C. Ribes
    • 2
  1. 1.Equipe M2N, CNAM ParisParisFrance
  2. 2.Groupe PSAVelizy-VillacoublayFrance

Personalised recommendations