Advertisement

Realizable Dynamic Large Eddy Simulation

  • R. Mokhtarpoor
  • S. HeinzEmail author
  • M. K. Stoellinger
Conference paper
Part of the ERCOFTAC Series book series (ERCO, volume 25)

Abstract

A very attractive feature of large eddy simulation (LES) is the possibility to apply the dynamic subgrid scale model calculation developed by Germano et al. Phys. Fluids A 3:1760–1765, 1991, [1]. This is a method for the calculation of model parameters as functions of time and space as the simulation progresses. It avoids empirical treatment of model parameters such as damping or wall modeling near the wall boundaries. On the other hand, dynamic LES models usually suffer from instabilities. The mechanism of instability of dynamic sub-grid scale (SGS) models has not yet been fully clarified. Several methods are in use for the stabilization of dynamic SGS models. The most popular methods are clipping of model parameters and their space averaging in homogeneous directions. These stabilization techniques are often difficult or even impossible to apply. In real flows, there are no homogeneous directions in space. It is also difficult to find appropriate clipping values for dynamic LES parameters, which can depend on the type of flow, Reynolds number and grid resolution.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge support through NASA’s NRA research opportunities in aeronautics program (Grant No. NNX12AJ71A) and support from the National Science Foundation (DMS-CDS&E-MSS, Grant No. 1622488). We are very thankful for computational resources provided by the Wyoming Advanced Research Computing Center [13] and the Wyoming-NCAR Alliance [14].

References

  1. 1.
    Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P., Cabot, W.H.: A dynamic sub grid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. Fluids A 3, 1760–1765 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heinz, S.: Realizability of dynamic subgrid-scale stress models via stochastic analysis. Monte Carlo Methods Appl. 14, 311–329 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heinz, S., Gopalan, H.: Realizable versus non-realizable dynamic subgrid-scale stress models. Phys. Fluids 24, 115105 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gopalan, H., Heinz, S., Stoellinger, M.: A unified RANS-LES model: computational development, accuracy and cost. J. Comput. Phys. 249, 249–274 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kazemi, E., Heinz, S.: Dynamic large eddy simulations of the Ekman layer based on stochastic analysis. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 17, 77–98 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Girimaji, S.S.: A new perspective on realizability of turbulence models. J. Fluid Mech. 512, 191–210 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heinz, S.: On Fokker-Planck equations for turbulent reacting flows. Part 2. Filter density function for large eddy simulation. Flow Turbul. Combust. 70, 153–181 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heinz, S.: Statistical Mechanics of Turbulent Flows. Springer, Berlin (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heinz, S.: A dynamic nonlinear subgrid-scale stress model. Phys. Fluids 17, 099101 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heinz, S.: Unified turbulence models for LES and RANS, FDF and PDF simulations. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 21, 99–118 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vreman, B., Geurts, B., Kuerten, H.: Realizability conditions for the turbulent stress tensor in large-eddy simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 278, 351–362 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mokhtarpoor, R.S., Heinz, S., Stoellinger, M.: Dynamic unified RANS-LES simulations of high Reynolds number separated flows. Phys. Fluids 28, 095101 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Advanced Research Computing Center. Mount Moran: IBM System X cluster. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming, http://n2t.net/ark:/85786/m4159c. Accessed 25 June 2017
  14. 14.
    Computational and Information Systems Laboratory. Yellowstone: IBM iDataPlex System (Wyoming-NCAR Alliance). Boulder, CO: National Center for Atmospheric Research, http://n2t.net/ark:/85065/d7wd3xhc. Accessed 25 June 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations