Losing Millennials in the City: Reflection on Contemporary Issues

  • Natacha Tracy
Part of the Contemporary Systems Thinking book series (CST)


The chapter explores the policy context that has shaped the life chances of the socio-demographic group called Millennials. The focus of the chapter is on the growing numbers of young people who have found their voice through online platforms where they address the many problems that will affect their lives far more than those of the people making the decisions.


Millennials Unemployment Political awareness 


  1. Bakardjieva, M. (2015). Do clouds have politics? Collective actors in social media land. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 983–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banaji, S. (2008). The trouble with civic: A snapshot of young people’s civic and political engagements in twenty-first-century democracies. Journal of Youth Studies, 11(5), 543–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaumont, P. (2011). Summer of unrest: Revolution road: Reflections on the Arab spring. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Basics and Beyond. New York, Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beckett, C., & Fenyoe, A. (2012). Connecting to the world: How global campaigners can be more effective in engaging online audiences. London: International Broadcasting Trust.Google Scholar
  6. Bimber, B., et al. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15(4), 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bimber, B., et al. (2009). Technological change and the shifting nature of political organization. In Routledge handbook of internet politics (pp. 72–85). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Broido, E. M. (2004). Understanding diversity in millennial students. New Directions for Student Services, 2004(106), 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coleman, S. (2008). Doing IT for themselves: Management versus autonomy in youth e-citizenship. In Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 189–206). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Collin, P. (2008). The internet, youth participation policies, and the development of young people’s political identities in Australia. Journal of Youth Studies, 11(5), 527–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dermody, J., & Hanmer-Lloyd, S. (2004). Segmenting youth voting behaviour through trusting–distrusting relationships: A conceptual approach. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 9(3), 202–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deschamps, R., & McNutt, K. (2014). Third sector and social media. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 5(2), 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Druckenmiller, D. A., & Mittleman, D. (2015). A design theory for digital habitats: Building virtual communities of practice. In: 2015 48th Hawaii international conference on System sciences (HICSS), IEEE.Google Scholar
  14. Earl, J. (2006). Pursuing social change online the use of four protest tactics on the internet. Social Science Computer Review, 24(3), 362–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Earl, J. (2014). The future of social movement organizations the waning dominance of SMOs online. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age. Cambridge: Mit Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Earl, J., et al. (2013). This protest will be tweeted: Twitter and protest policing during the Pittsburgh G20. Information, Communication & Society, 16(4), 459–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Earl, J., & Schussman, A. (2008). Contesting cultural control: Youth culture and online petitioning. In Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 71–95). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Farthing, R. (2010). The politics of youthful antipolitics: representing the ‘issue’of youth participation in politics. Journal of Youth Studies, 13(2), 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freeman, H. (2016). Don’t play Idenity politics! The primal scream of the straight white male. The Guardian: London. Retrieved from
  21. Friedman, Z. (2017). Student loan debt in 2017: A $1.3 trillion crisis. Forbes: New York. Retrieved from
  22. Gerbaudo, P., & Treré, E. (2015). In search of the ‘we’of social media activism: introduction to the special issue on social media and protest identities. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 865–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jericho, G. (2016). Some jobs are going but it’s automation, not free trade that’s the problem. The Guardian: Cambridge. Retrieved from
  25. Kavada, A. (2015). Creating the collective: Social media, the occupy movement and its constitution as a collective actor. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 872–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keeter, S., & Taylor, P. (2009 December 11). The millennials. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Lott, E. (1998). Boomer liberalism. Transition, 78, 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin, A. (2012). Political participation among the young in Australia: Testing Dalton’s good citizen thesis. Australian Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rorty, R. (1999). Achieving our country: Leftist thought in twentieth-century America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ryan, C., et al. (1998). Media, movements, and the quest for social justice. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26(2), 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Leuven, S., & Joye, S. (2014). Civil society organizations at the gates? A gatekeeping study of news making efforts by NGOs and government institutions. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(2), 160–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vromen, A. (2015). Campaign Entrepreneurs in Online Collective Action: GetUp! in Australia. Social Movement Studies, 14(2), 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vromen, A., & Coleman, W. (2011). Online movement mobilisation and electoral politics: The case of getup! [online]. Communication, Politics & Culture, 44(2), 76–94.Google Scholar
  34. Wenger, E., et al. (2009). Digital habitats: Stewarding technology for communities. CPsquare.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natacha Tracy
    • 1
  1. 1.Flinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations