Semantic Interpretation of Haptic Feedback

  • Daniel Sebastian LeidnerEmail author
Part of the Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics book series (STAR, volume 127)


The previous chapters developed the representations, the planning methods, and a suitable approach to execute compliant manipulate tasks at the example of wiping chores. However, up to this point, the robot is still unaware of the actually achieved task performance. To that end, this chapter investigates the last remaining element of the Intelligent Physical Compliance concept, i. e. the interpretation of the executed actions and the subsequent estimation of the task performance.


  1. Albu-Schäffer, Alin, Sami Haddadin, Christian Ott, Andreas Stemmer, Thomas Wimböck, and Gerd Hirzinger. 2007a. The DLR Lightweight Robot: Design and Control Concepts for Robots in Human Environments. Industrial Robot: An International Journal 34 (5): 376–385.Google Scholar
  2. Beetz, Michael, Moritz Tenorth, and Jan Winkler. 2015. Open-EASE-A Knowledge Processing Service for Robots and Robotics/AI Researchers. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 983–1990.Google Scholar
  3. Beetz, Michael, Daniel Beßler, Jan Winkler, Jan-H. Worch, Ferenc Balint-Benczedi, Georg Bartels, Aude Billard, Asil K. Bozcuoglu, Zhou Fang, Nadia Figueroa, Andrei Haidu, Hagen Langer, Alexis Maldonado, Ana-Lucia Pais, Moritz Tenorth, and Thiemo Wiedemeyer. 2016. Open Robotics Research Using Web-based Knowledge Services. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 5380–5387.Google Scholar
  4. Denei, Simone, Fulvio Mastrogiovanni, and Giorgio Cannata. 2015. Towards the Creation of Tactile Maps for Robots and Their use in Robot Contact Motion Control. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 63: 293–308.Google Scholar
  5. Do, Martin, Julian Schill, Johannes Ernesti, and Tamim Asfour. 2014. Learn to Wipe: A Case Study of Structural Bootstrapping from Sensorimotor Experience. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 1858–1864.Google Scholar
  6. Ferrucci, David A. 2012. Introduction to “This is Watson”. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 56 (3.4): 1–1.Google Scholar
  7. Fischler, Martin A, and Robert C Bolles. 1981. Random Sample Consensus: A Paradigm for Model Fitting with Applications to Image Analysis and Automated Cartography. Communications of the ACM, 24 (6): 381–395.Google Scholar
  8. Flanagan, J Randall, Miles C Bowman, and Roland S Johansson. 2006. Control Strategies in Object Manipulation Tasks. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16 (6): 650–659.Google Scholar
  9. Gams, Andrej, Tadej Petric, Bojan Nemec, and Ales Ude. 2014. Learning and Adaptation of Periodic Motion Primitives Based on Force Feedback and Human Coaching Interaction. In IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (ICHR), 166–171.Google Scholar
  10. Ghallab, Malik, Dana Nau, and Paolo Traverso. 2004. Automated Planning: Theory and Practice. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  11. Gibson, James J. 1962. Observations on Active Touch. Psychological Review, 69 (6): 477.Google Scholar
  12. Gibson, James J. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems.Google Scholar
  13. Haidu, Andrei, and Michael Beetz. 2016. Action Recognition and Interpretation from Virtual Demonstrations. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2833–2838. IEEE.Google Scholar
  14. Hazara, Murtaza, and Ville Kyrki. 2016. Reinforcement Learning for Improving Imitated In-Contact Skills. In Proceedings of the IEEE-RAS 16th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (ICHR), 194–201. IEEE.Google Scholar
  15. Hess, Jürgen, Jürgen Sturm, and Wolfram Burgard. 2011. Learning the State Transition Model to Efficiently Clean Surfaces with Mobile Manipulation Robots. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Manipulation under Uncertainty at the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).Google Scholar
  16. Hess, Jürgen, Maximilian Beinhofer, and Wolfram Burgard. 2014. A Probabilistic Approach to High-Confidence Cleaning Guarantees for Low-Cost Cleaning Robots. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 5600–5605.Google Scholar
  17. Hirzinger, Gerd, Norbert Sporer, Alin Albu-Schäffer, M Hähnle, Rainer Krenn, A Pascucci, and Manfred Schedl. 2002. DLR’s Torque-controlled Light Weight Robot III-Are We Reaching the Technological Limits Now? In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), vol. 2, pp. 1710–1716. IEEE.Google Scholar
  18. Hogan, Neville. 1987. Stable Execution of Contact Tasks using Impedance Control. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 4, pp. 1047–1054.Google Scholar
  19. Kawato, Mitsuo. 1999. Internal Models for Motor Control and Trajectory Planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 9 (6): 718–727.Google Scholar
  20. Kunze, Lars, Mihai Emanuel Dolha, Emitza Guzman, and Michael Beetz. Simulation-based Temporal Projection of Everyday Robot Object Manipulation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), 107–114.Google Scholar
  21. Leidner, Daniel, and Michael Beetz. 2016. Inferring the Effects of Wiping Motions Based on Haptic Perception. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (ICHR), 461–468.Google Scholar
  22. Martínez, David, Guillem Alenya, and Carme Torras. 2015. Planning Robot Manipulation to Clean Planar Surfaces. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 39: 23–32.Google Scholar
  23. Norman, Donald A, and Tim Shallice. 1980. Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior. Technical report, DTIC Document.Google Scholar
  24. Pastor, Peter, Mrinal Kalakrishnan, Sachin Chitta, Evangelos Theodorou, and Stefan Schaal. 2011. Skill Learning and Task Outcome Prediction for Mmanipulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 3828–3834. IEEE.Google Scholar
  25. Silver, David, Aja Huang, Chris J Maddison, Arthur Guez, Laurent Sifre, George Van Den Driessche, Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Veda Panneershelvam, Marc Lanctot, et al. 2016. Mastering the Game of Go with Deep Neural Networks and Tree Search. Nature, 529 (7587): 484–489.Google Scholar
  26. Šmilauer, Václav, Emanuele Catalano, Bruno Chareyre, Sergei Dorofeenko, Jerome Duriez, Anton Gladky, Janek Kozicki, Chiara Modenese, Luc Scholtès, Luc Sibille, et al. 2010. Yade Reference Documentation. Yade Documentation, 474.Google Scholar
  27. Sterling, Leon, and Ehud Y Shapiro. 1994. The Art of Prolog: Advanced Programming Techniques. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Winkler, Jan, and Michael Beetz. 2015. Robot Action Plans that Form and Maintain Expectations. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 5174–5180.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Robotics and MechatronicsGerman Aerospace Center (DLR)WesslingGermany

Personalised recommendations