Advertisement

Enhancing Clinical Decision Support Through Information Processing Capabilities and Strategic IT Alignment

  • Rogier van de Wetering
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 339)

Abstract

Hospitals heavily invest in Healthcare IT to improve the efficiency of hospital operations, improve practitioner performance and to enhance patient care. The literature suggests that decision support systems may contribute to these benefits in clinical practice. By building upon the resource-based view of the firm (RBV), we claim that hospitals that invest in a so-called information processing capacity (IPC)—the ability to gather complete patient data and information and enhance clinical processes—will substantially enhance their clinical decision support capability (CDSC). After controlling for common method bias, we use Partial Least Squares SEM to analyze our primary claim. Following the resource and capability-based view of the firm, we test our hypotheses on a cross-sectional data sample of 720 European hospitals. We find that there is a positive association between a hospital’s IPC and clinical decision support capability (CDSC). IT alignment moderates this relationship. All included control variables showed nonsignificant results. Extant research has not been able to identify those IT-enabled capabilities that strengthen CDSC in hospital practice. This study contributes to this particular gap in the literature and advances our understanding of how to efficaciously deploy CDSC in clinical practice.

Keywords

Clinical decision support capability Information processing capability Health information exchange Information capability The resource-based view of the firm (RBV) Strategic IT alignment Hospitals 

References

  1. 1.
    Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L.M.: Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J. Econ. Perspect. 14(4), 23–48 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agha, L.: The effects of health information technology on the costs and quality of medical care. J. Health Econ. 34, 19–30 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, J., McCullough, J.S., Town, R.J.: The impact of health information technology on hospital productivity. RAND J. Econ. 44(3), 545–568 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haux, R.: Medical informatics: past, present, future. Int. J. Med. Inform. 79(9), 599–610 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ludwick, D., Doucette, J.: Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. Int. J. Med. Inform. 78(1), 22–31 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McGlynn, E., et al.: The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. New Engl. J. Med. 348(26), 2635–2645 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chiasson, M., et al.: Expanding multi-disciplinary approaches to healthcare information technologies: what does information systems offer medical informatics? Int. J. Med. Inform. 76, S89–S97 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Curtright, J.W., Stolp-Smith, S.C., Edell, E.S.: Strategic performance management: development of a performance measurement system at the Mayo clinic. J. Healthc. Manag. 45(1), 58–68 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahovuo, J., et al.: Process oriented organisation in the regional PACS environment. In: EuroPACS-MIR 2004 in the Enlarged Europe, pp. 481–484 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garg, A.X., et al.: Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 293(10), 1223–1238 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Romano, M.J., Stafford, R.S.: Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. Arch. Intern. Med. 171(10), 897–903 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elkin, P.L., et al.: The introduction of a diagnostic decision support system (DXplain™) into the workflow of a teaching hospital service can decrease the cost of service for diagnostically challenging Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs). Int. J. Med. Inform. 79(11), 772–777 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaushal, R., Shojania, K.G., Bates, D.W.: Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch. Intern. Med. 163(12), 1409–1416 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buntin, M.B., et al.: The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Aff. 30(3), 464–471 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., Sambamurthy, V.: Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15(2), 120–131 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weill, P., Subramani, M., Broadbent, M.: Building IT infrastructure for strategic agility. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 44(1), 57 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hirschheim, R., Sabherwal, R.: Detours in the path toward strategic information systems alignment. Calif. Manag. Rev. 44(1), 87–108 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chan, Y.E., Reich, B.H.: IT alignment: what have we learned? J. Inf. Technol. 22(4), 297–315 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wernerfelt, B.: A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 5(2), 171–180 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mithas, S., Tafti, A., Mitchell, W.: How a firm’s competitive environment and digital strategic posture influence digital business strategy. MIS Q. 37(2), 511–536 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goh, J.M., Gao, G., Agarwal, R.: Evolving work routines: adaptive routinization of information technology in healthcare. Inf. Syst. Res. 22(3), 565–585 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Van de Wetering, R., Versendaal, J.: How a flexible collaboration infrastructure impacts healthcare information exchange. In: Proceedings of the 31th Bled eConference Digital Transformation – Meeting the Challenges, Bled, Slovenia (2018)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Walker, J., et al.: The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. Health Aff. 24, W5 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hersh, W.R., et al.: Outcomes from health information exchange: systematic review and future research needs. JMIR Med. Informa. 3(4), e39 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Galbraith, J.R.: Organization design: an information processing view. Interfaces 4(3), 28–36 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bharadwaj, A., et al.: Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Setia, P., Venkatesh, V., Joglekar, S.: Leveraging digital technologies: how information quality leads to localized capabilities and customer service performance. MIS Q. 37(2), 565–590 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    El Sawy, O.A., et al.: Research commentary-seeking the configurations of digital ecodynamics: it takes three to tango. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(4), 835–848 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Van de Wetering, R., Versendaal, J., Walraven, P.: Examining the relationship between a hospital’s IT infrastructure capability and digital capabilities: a resource-based perspective. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS). AIS, New Orleans (2018)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    El Sawy, O.A., Pavlou, P.A.: IT-enabled business capabilities for turbulent environments. MIS Q. Exec. 7(3), 139–150 (2008)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mithas, S., et al.: Information technology and firm profitability: mechanisms and empirical evidence. MIS Q. 36(1), 205–224 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sheikh, A., Sood, H.S., Bates, D.W.: Leveraging health information technology to achieve the “triple aim” of healthcare reform. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 22(4), 849–856 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang, E.T.: Effect of the fit between information processing requirements and capacity on organizational performance. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 23(3), 239–247 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tushman, M.L., Nadler, D.A.: Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad. Manag. Rev. 3(3), 613–624 (1978)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vest, J.R., et al.: Challenges, alternatives, and paths to sustainability for health information exchange efforts. J. Med. Syst. 37(6), 9987 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kaelber, D.C., Bates, D.W.: Health information exchange and patient safety. J. Biomed. Inform. 40(6), S40–S45 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sutcliffe, K.M., Lewton, E., Rosenthal, M.M.: Communication failures: an insidious contributor to medical mishaps. Acad. Med. 79(2), 186–194 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Marchand, D.A., Kettinger, W.J., Rollins, J.D.: Information orientation: people, technology and the bottom line. Sloan Manag. Rev. 41(4), 69 (2000)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jadad, A.R., et al.: The internet and evidence-based decision-making: a needed synergy for efficient knowledge management in health care. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 162(3), 362–365 (2000)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tallon, P.P., Pinsonneault, A.: Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: insights from a mediation model. MIS Q. 35(2), 463–486 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Strassman, P.A.: Business Value of Computers. The Information Economic Press, New Canaan (1990)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Firth, L., Francis, P.: Understanding the lack of adoption of E-commerce in the health sector: the clinician’s strategic perspective. In: IADIS Virtual Conference, Lisbon (2004)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Van de Wetering, R., Batenburg, R., Lederman, R.: Evolutionistic or revolutionary paths? A PACS maturity model for strategic situational planning. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 5(4), 401–409 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    King, W.R.: Strategic planning for IS: the state of practice and research. MIS Q. 9(2), 6–7 (1985). Editor’s commentGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organisations. IBM Syst. J. 32(1), 4–16 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gerow, J.E., et al.: Looking toward the future of IT-business strategic alignment through the past: a meta-analysis. MIS Q. 38(4), 1059–1085 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Henderson, J.C., Thomas, J.B.: Aligning business and information technology domains: strategic planning in hospitals. J. Healthc. Manag. 37(1), 71 (1992)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Luftman, J., Brier, T.: Achieving and sustaining business-IT alignment. Calif. Manag. Rev. 42(1), 109–122 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Avison, D., et al.: Using and validating the strategic alignment model. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 13(3), 223–246 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Van de Wetering, R., Batenburg, R.: Towards a theory of PACS deployment: an integrative PACS maturity framework. J. Digit. Imaging 27(3), 337–350 (2014)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Podsakoff, P.M., et al.: Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(5), 879 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wade, M., Hulland, J.: Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Q. 28(1), 107–142 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ravichandran, T., Lertwongsatien, C.: Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: a resource-based perspective. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 21(4), 237–276 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hair Jr., J.F., et al.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2016)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Henseler, J., et al.: Common beliefs and reality about PLS: comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organ. Res. Methods 17(2), 182–209 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Becker, J.-M.: SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH (2015). http://www.smartpls.com
  57. 57.
    Fornell, C., Larcker, D.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43(1), 115–135 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Geisser, S.: A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika 61(1), 101–107 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Barney, J.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17(1), 99–120 (1991)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Akter, S., et al.: How to improve firm performance using big data analytics capability and business strategy alignment? Int. J. Prod. Econ. 182, 113–131 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lapointe, L., Mignerat, M., Vedel, I.: The IT productivity paradox in health: a stakeholder’s perspective. Int. J. Med. Inform. 80(2), 102–115 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Jones, S.S., et al.: Unraveling the IT productivity paradox—lessons for health care. New Engl. J. Med. 366(24), 2243–2245 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Management Science and TechnologyOpen University of the NetherlandsHeerlenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations