Advertisement

Business-IT Alignment Improvement in Co-creation Value Networks: Design of a Reference Model-Based Support

  • Samaneh BagheriEmail author
  • Rob Kusters
  • Jos Trienekens
  • Paul W. P. J. Grefen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 339)

Abstract

Prior research has not adequately addressed business-IT alignment (BITA) improvement, especially in a business network situation of a co-creation value network (VN). In a VN setting, IT is regarded as a major facilitator of actors’ collaboration to realize their joint objectives, i.e. to deliver seamless customer experience through providing mass-customized integrated solutions. To effectively use IT, a sufficient degree of BITA for key capabilities of a VN is required. Furthermore, BITA as a moving target should be improved continuously over time.

In this paper, BITA improvement in a VN setting is studied. We focus on BITA improvement for the key capabilities of a VN and design support for it. To this end, we adopt a dynamic capability perspective due to its ability to explain how organizations can improve their operational capabilities and processes to adjust to a changing environment. We design a reference model-based approach that enhances the ‘business process management’ dynamic capability of a VN by enabling co-development of business processes with their supporting IT-based systems. This co-development facilitates BITA improvement. This paper presents the research process of the design of our support. As a proof of concept, the results for one of the key capabilities of a VN (i.e., customer understanding) is presented and discussed.

Keywords

Business-IT alignment improvement Reference model Key capabilities Co-evolution Dynamic capability Co-creation value network 

References

  1. 1.
    Luftman, J., Lyytinen, K., Ben Zvi, T.: Enhancing the measurement of information technology (IT) business alignment and its influence on company performance. J. Inf. Technol. 32(1), 26–46 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gerow, J.E., Thatcher, J.B., Grover, V.: Six types of IT-business strategic alignment: an investigation of the constructs and their measurement. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 24(5), 465–491 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, H.: Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst. J. 32(1), 472–484 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tallon, P.P.: A process-oriented perspective on the alignment of information technology and business strategy. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 227–268 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, R.-S., et al.: Aligning information technology and business strategy with a dynamic capabilities perspective: a longitudinal study of a Taiwanese Semiconductor Company. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 28(5), 366–378 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pijpers, V., et al.: Using conceptual models to explore business-ICT alignment in networked value constellations. Requir. Eng. 17(3), 203–226 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coltman, T., et al.: Strategic IT alignment: twenty-five years on. J. Inf. Technol. 30(2), 91–100 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grefen, P., Turetken, O.: Advanced business process management in networked E-business scenarios. Int. J. E-Bus. Res. (IJEBR) 13(4), 70–104 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J. Mark. 68(1), 1–17 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Jaakkola, E.: Value co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: a dyadic perspective on the joint problem solving process. Ind. Mark. Manag. 41(1), 15–26 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gebauer, H., Paiola, M., Saccani, N.: Characterizing service networks for moving from products to solutions. Ind. Mark. Manag. 42(1), 31–46 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M.: Collaborative networked organizations: Status and trends in manufacturing. Annu. Rev. Control 33(2), 199–208 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baker, J., et al.: Conceptualizing the dynamic strategic alignment competency. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 12(4), 299 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang, M., et al.: Evolvement of business-it alignment: a conceptual model and intervening changes from resource allocation. IEEE Access 6, 9160–9172 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ravichandran, T., Lertwongsatien, C., Lertwongsatien, C.: Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: a resource-based perspective. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 21(4), 237–276 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Trkman, P.: The critical success factors of business process management. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 30(2), 125–134 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zollo, M., Winter, S.G.: Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13(3), 339–351 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zahra, S.A., Sapienza, H.J., Davidsson, P.: Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda. J. Manag. Stud. 43(4), 917–955 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vera, D., et al.: Knowledge-based and contextual factors associated with R&D teams’ improvisation capability. J. Manag. 42(7), 1874–1903 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thomas, O.: Understanding the term reference model in information systems research: history, literature analysis and explanation. In: Bussler, C.J., Haller, A. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3812, pp. 484–496. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/11678564_45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frank, U.: Evaluation of reference models. Reference modeling for business systems analysis, pp. 118–140 (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yeow, A., Soh, C., Hansen, R.: Aligning with new digital strategy: a dynamic capabilities approach. J. Strat. Inf. Syst. 27(1), 43–58 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Teece, D.J.: Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strat. Manag. J. 28(13), 1319–1350 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schwarz, A., et al.: A dynamic capabilities approach to understanding the impact of IT-enabled businesses processes and IT-business alignment on the strategic and operational performance of the firm. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 26(1), 4 (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M.: Collaborative networks: a mechanism for enterprise agility and resilience. In: Mertins, K., Bénaben, F., Poler, R., Bourrières, J.-P. (eds.) Enterprise Interoperability VI. PIC, vol. 7, pp. 3–11. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04948-9_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schryen, G.: Revisiting IS business value research: what we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22(2), 139–169 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang, Y., et al.: IT capabilities and innovation performance: the mediating role of market orientation. CAIS 33, 9 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grant, R.M.: The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. Calif. Manag. Rev. 33, 114–135 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Teece, D.J.: A capability theory of the firm: an economics and (strategic) management perspective. N. Z. Econ. Pap. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2017.1371208
  30. 30.
    Eisenhardt, K.M., Martin, J.A.: Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strat. Manag. J. 21, 1105–1121 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ortbach, K., et al.: A dynamic capability-based framework for business process management: theorizing and empirical application. In: 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS). IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lehnert, M., Linhart, A., Roeglinger, M.: Exploring the intersection of business process improvement and BPM capability development: a research agenda. Bus. Process Manag. J. 23(2), 275–292 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lichtenthaler, U., Lichtenthaler, E.: A capability-based framework for open innovation: complementing absorptive capacity. J. Manag. Stud. 46(8), 1315–1338 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schwens, C., Kabst, R.: How early opposed to late internationalizers learn: experience of others and paradigms of interpretation. Int. Bus. Rev. 18(5), 509–522 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Peffers, K., et al.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hevner, A., et al.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University 33(2004), 1–26 (2004)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Habershon, N.: Metaplan (R): achieving two-way communications. J. Eur. Ind. Train. 17(7), 8–13 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bagheri, S., Kusters, R.J., Trienekens, J.: Business-IT alignment in PSS value networks: a capability-based framework. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H. (eds.) PRO-VE 2014. IAICT, vol. 434, pp. 273–284. Springer, Heidelberg (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44745-1_27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ullah, A., Lai, R.: A systematic review of business and information technology alignment. ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst. (TMIS) 4(1), 4 (2013)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Aversano, L., Grasso, C., Tortorella, M.: Managing the alignment between business processes and software systems. Inf. Softw. Technol. 72, 171–188 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ullah, A., Lai, R.: Modeling business goal for business/it alignment using requirements engineering. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 51(3), 21–28 (2011)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bleistein, S.J., et al.: B-SCP: a requirements analysis framework for validating strategic alignment of organizational IT based on strategy, context, and process. Inf. Softw. Technol. 48(9), 846–868 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Davis, G.B.: Strategies for information requirements determination. IBM Syst. J. 21(1), 4–30 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M., et al.: Collaborative networked organizations–Concepts and practice in manufacturing enterprises. Comput. Ind. Eng. 57(1), 46–60 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fernandez, D.M., et al.: Naming the pain in requirements engineering. Empir. Softw. Eng. 22(5), 2298–2338 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bagheri, S., Kusters, R.J., Trienekens, J.J.: Eliciting end users requirements of a supportive system for tacit knowledge management processes in value networks: a Delphi study. In: 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC). IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Payne, A.F., Storbacka, K., Frow, P.: Managing the co-creation of value. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 36(1), 83–96 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zomerdijk, L.G., Voss, C.A.: NSD processes and practices in experiential services. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 28(1), 63–80 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jaakkola, E., Hakanen, T.: Value co-creation in solution networks. Ind. Mark. Manag. 42(1), 47–58 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bagheri, S., Kusters, R., Trienekens, J.: Business-IT alignment in PSS value networks linking customer knowledge management to social customer relationship management. In: ICEIS 2015, pp. 249–257. SciTePress (2015)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bagheri, S., Kusters, R., Trienekens, J.: The customer knowledge management lifecycle in PSS value networks: towards process characterization. In: Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited Reading, UK (2015)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bagheri, S., et al.: Classification framework of knowledge transfer issues across value networks. Procedia CIRP 47, 382–387 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Preston, D.S., Karahanna, E.: Antecedents of IS strategic alignment: a nomological network. Inf. Syst. Res. 20(2), 159–179 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Alaceva, C., Rusu, L.: Barriers in achieving business/IT alignment in a large Swedish company: what we have learned? Comput. Hum. Behav. 51, 715–728 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samaneh Bagheri
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rob Kusters
    • 1
  • Jos Trienekens
    • 1
  • Paul W. P. J. Grefen
    • 1
  1. 1.Industrial Engineering DepartmentEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations