Advertisement

Software Ecosystem Health of Cryptocurrencies

  • Matthijs Berkhout
  • Fons van den Brink
  • Mart van Zwienen
  • Paul van Vulpen
  • Slinger Jansen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 336)

Abstract

Background: Cryptocurrencies are highly valued without understanding the health of the underlying ecosystems. Previous work shows factors which determinate the exchange rate. However, the technological determinants show decreasing significance. Objective: This paper explores whether the Open-source Software Ecosystem Health Operationalization (OSEHO) framework can be used to extend the given technology factors. Method: By conducting the OSEHO in a case-study on three distinct cryptocurrency ecosystems, this paper gives a better insight in the ecosystem’s value, longevity and propensity for growth and the relation of these factors to the cryptocurrency value. Results: The ‘healthiest’ cryptocurrency ecosystem also shows the highest economic health. Two metrics from the OSEHO show strong positive significant correlation with the exchange rate. Conclusion: Metrics from the OSEHO show promising indications to be technological determinants for the exchange rate. This research can be used as a foundation for further econometric tests or research on other aspects of cryptocurrencies.

Keywords

Cryptocurrency Software ecosystems Ecosystem health Bitcoin Ethereum Ripple 

References

  1. 1.
    Li, X., Wang, C.A.: The technology and economic determinants of cryptocurrency exchange rates: the case of Bitcoin. Decis. Support Syst. 95, 49–60 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Swan, M.: Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., Smolander, K.: Where is current research on blockchain technology? - a systematic review. PLoS ONE 11, 1–27 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jansen, S., Finkelstein, A., Brinkkemper, S.: A sense of community: a research agenda for software ecosystems. In: 2009 31st International Conference on Software Engineering-Companion, pp. 187–190 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jansen, S.: Measuring the health of open source software ecosystems: beyond the scope of project health. Inf. Softw. Technol. 56, 1508–1519 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manikas, K.: Revisiting software ecosystems research: a longitudinal literature study. J. Syst. Softw. 117, 84–103 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    White, L.H.: The market for cryptocurrencies. Cato J. 35, 383–402 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buterin, V.: Ethereum white paper (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schwartz, D., Youngs, N., Britto, A.: The Ripple Protocol Consensus Algorithm. Ripple Labs Inc White Paper, pp. 1–8 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Böhme, R., Christin, N., Edelman, B., Moore, T.: Bitcoin: economics, technology, and governance. J. Econ. Perspect. 29, 213–238 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bouoiyour, J., Selmi, R.: What does Bitcoin look like? Ann. Econ. Financ. 16, 449–492 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kristoufek, L.: BitCoin meets Google Trends and Wikipedia: quantifying the relationship between phenomena of the Internet era. Sci. Rep. 3, 1–7 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kristoufek, L.: What are the main drivers of the Bitcoin price? Evidence from wavelet coherence analysis. PLoS ONE 10, 1–15 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garcia, D., Tessone, C.J., Mavrodiev, P., Perony, N.: The digital traces of bubbles: feedback cycles between socio-economic signals in the Bitcoin economy. J. R. Soc. Interface. 11 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Messerschmitt, D.G., Szyperski, C.: Software Ecosystem: Understanding an Indispensable Technology and Industry. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Manikas, K., Hansen, K.M.: Software ecosystems-a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 86, 1294–1306 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lucassen, G., van Rooij, K., Jansen, S.: Ecosystem health of cloud PaaS providers. In: Herzwurm, G., Margaria, T. (eds.) ICSOB 2013. LNBIP, vol. 150, pp. 183–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39336-5_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Den Hartigh, E., Tol, M., Visscher, W.: The health measurement of a business ecosystem. In: ECCON 2006 Annual Meetingm, vol. 2783565, pp. 1–39 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Iansiti, M., Levien, R.: Strategy as ecology. Harv. Bus. Rev. 82, 68–81 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alami, D., Rodríguez, M., Jansen, S.: Relating health to platform success. In: Proceedings of the 2015 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops - ECSAW 2015, pp. 1–6 (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    van Lingen, S., Palomba, A., Lucassen, G.: On the software ecosystem health of open source content management systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Software Ecosystems, vol. 987, pp. 45–56 (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    van Vulpen, P., Menkveld, A., Jansen, S.: Health measurement of data-scarce software ecosystems: a case study of Apple’s ResearchKit. In: Ojala, A., Holmström Olsson, H., Werder, K. (eds.) ICSOB 2017. LNBIP, vol. 304, pp. 131–145. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69191-6_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Seichter, D., Dhungana, D., Pleuss, A., Hauptmann, B.: Knowledge management in software ecosystems: software artefacts as first-class citizens. In: Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Volume (ECSA 2010), pp. 119–126 (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hoving, R., Slot, G., Jansen, S.: Python: characteristics identification of a free open source software ecosystem. In: 2013 7th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST), pp. 13–18. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gousios, G.: The GHTorrent dataset and tool suite. In: Proceedings of the 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, pp. 233–236 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthijs Berkhout
    • 1
  • Fons van den Brink
    • 1
  • Mart van Zwienen
    • 1
  • Paul van Vulpen
    • 1
  • Slinger Jansen
    • 1
  1. 1.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations