Advertisement

Conclusions

  • Hans H. TungEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Politics and Development of Contemporary China book series (PDCC)

Abstract

In this chapter, I conclude the book with a summary of its findings, a discussion of several avenues for future research, and a set of policy suggestions. Through formal models and a case study on post-reform China, the book changes the way we used to understand the relationship between economic growth and the resilience of an authoritarian regime by showing that the effect of the former is actually not monotonic as previously assumed. Intuitively, economic prosperity strengthens the regime as it will raise the costs for people in the regime to deviate from the status quo and cope with their collective action problem to topple the regime. I contend that economic growth nonetheless has an opposite effect for upsetting the original balance of power among political elites. More critically, in addition to the finding about the (endogenously) destabilizing effect of authoritarian institutions, the book also helps us understand how they change. The findings have implications for both academics and policymakers who would like to assess the political effects of economic engagement with dictatorships.

Bibliography

  1. Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, Hannah. 1951. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  3. Brownlee, Jason. 2007. Heredity Succession in Modern Autocracies. World Politics 59: 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Randolph M. Siverson, and James D. Morrow. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frantz, Erica, and Elizabeth A. Stein. 2016. Countering Coups: Leadership Succession Rules in Dictatorships. Comparative Political Studies 50 (7): 935–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Friedrich, Carl J., and Zbigniew K. Brzezinski. 1965. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gallagher, Mary, and Jonathan Hanson. 2015. Power Tool or Dull Blade? Resilient Autocracy and the Selectorate Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 18: 367–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gandhi, Jennifer. 2008a. Political Institutions Under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Geddes, Barbara, Joseph Wright, and Erica Frantz. 2014. Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set. Perspectives on Politics 12 (2): 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hansen, Wendy L. 1990. The International Trade Commission and the Politics of Protectionism. American Political Science Review 84 (1): 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kennedy, Scott. 2005. China’s Porous Protectionism: The Changing Political Economy of Trade Policy. Political Science Quarterly 120 (3): 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kokkonen, Andrej, and Anders Sundell. 2014. Delivering Stability—Primogeniture and Autocratic Survival in European Monarchies 1000–1800. American Political Science Review 108 (2): 438–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Menaldo, Victor. 2012. The Middle East and North Africa’s Resilient Monarchs. Journal of Politics 74 (3): 707–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nathan, Andrew J. 2003. Authoritarian Resilience. Journal of Democracy 14 (1): 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42 (3): 427–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ramseyer, Mark, and Francis M. Rosenbluth. 1995. The Politics of Oligarchy: Institutional Choice in Imperial Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Share, Donald. 1986. The Franquist Regime and the Dilemma of Succession. Review of Politics 48 (4): 549–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weeks, Jessica. 2008. Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve. International Organization 62 (1): 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wintrobe, Ronald. 1998. The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ———. 2001. How to Understand, and Deal with Dictatorship: An Economist’s View. Economics of Governance 2 (1): 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science/Center for Research in Econometric Theory and ApplicationsNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations