Advertisement

Who Is the Dreamer?

  • Cam CobbEmail author
  • Michael K. Potter
Chapter

Abstract

The delineation between dream and reality is a fuzzy one in Twin Peaks: The Return. So are the lines from one dream to another. As a result, we can never quite be sure is what are seeing is real, or in a dream. Yet it is more than that. Because there is not any one dream, we can never tell exactly whose dream we are in at any given moment. But can dreams truly help us to unravel this vast, enigmatic story? While some, such as Jane Douglas and Siobhan Lyons, caution us about using dream theory to analyze David Lynch’s work, dreams nevertheless offer a useful way of unraveling the complex nature of The Return.

References

  1. Beaulieu-Prévost, Dominic, and Antonio Zadra. 2015. ‘When People Remember Dreams They Never Experienced: A Study of the Malleability of Dream Recall over Time.’ Dreaming 25, no. 1: 18–31.Google Scholar
  2. Bulkeley, Kelly. 2003. ‘Dreaming and the Cinema of David Lynch.’ Dreaming 13, no. 1: 49–60.Google Scholar
  3. Finnie, S. B., and Karim Nader. 2012. ‘The Role of Metaplasticity Mechanisms in Regulating Memory Destabilization and Reconsolidation.’ Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 36: 1667–1707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fosshage, James L. 2007. ‘The Organizing Functions of Dreaming: Pivotal Issues in Understanding and Working with Dreams.’ International Forum of Psychoanalysis 16, no. 4: 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frost, Mark. 2017. Twin Peaks: The Final Dossier. London: Flatiron Books.Google Scholar
  6. Halskov, Andreas. 2015. TV Peaks: Twin Peaks and Modern Television Drama. Odense: University of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
  7. Lewis, Robyn. 2002. ‘Nice Film—If You Can Get It.’ The Guardian, 17 January. https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2002/jan/17/artsfeatures.davidlynch. Accessed on 15 May 2018.
  8. Linde, Charlotte. 1999. ‘The Transformation of Narrative Syntax into Institutional Memory.’ Narrative Inquiry 9, no. 1: 139–174.Google Scholar
  9. Loftus, Elizabeth F. 1992. ‘When a Lie Becomes Memory’s Truth: Memory Distortion After Exposure to Misinformation.’ Current Directions in Psychological Science 1, no. 4: 121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lyons, Siobhan. 2016. ‘Moving Beyond the Dream Theory: A New Approach to Mulholland Drive.’ PopMatters, 3 August. https://www.popmatters.com/moving-beyond-the-dream-theory-a-new-approach-to-mulholland-drive-2495428968.html?rebelltitem=1#rebelltitem1. Accessed on 15 May 2018.
  11. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2007. Ecce Homo: How to Become What You Are. Translated by Duncan Large. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Pickel, Kerri. 2010. ‘When a Lie Becomes the Truth: The Effects of Self-Generated Misinformation on Eyewitness Memory.’ Memory 12, no. 1: 14–26.Google Scholar
  13. Rodley, Chris, ed. 2005. Lynch on Lynch. Revised ed. New York: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  14. Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2000. Existentialism and Human Emotion. Translated by Bernanrd Frechtman and Hazel E. Barnes. New York, NY: Citidel Press.Google Scholar
  15. Schechtman, Marya. 1994. ‘The Truth About Memory.’ Philosophical Psychology 7, no. 1: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Taubin, Amy. 2001. ‘In Dreams.’ Film Comment 37, no. 5 (September–October): 51–54.Google Scholar
  17. Thorne, John. 2016. The Essential Wrapped in Plastic: Pathways to Twin Peaks. Dallas, TX: John Thorne.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations