Advertisement

Forward to the Market into the 1990s

  • David Elliott
Chapter
Part of the Energy, Climate and the Environment book series (ECE)

Abstract

In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the focus in energy policy moved towards privatisation, with the leading renewables, like wind power, being expected to begin to move towards commercial viability so that government support could be removed. To help them, a special market-based support scheme was developed, the Non-Fossil Fuel Obligation, although the main initial beneficiary of it was nuclear power. The less-developed renewables, like wave power, were faced with diminishing levels of support, and the deep geothermal and tidal programmes were halted.

References

  1. Department of Energy. (1988). Renewable Energy in the UK: The Way Forward, Energy Paper No. 55. London: Department of Energy.Google Scholar
  2. DTI. (1994a). New and Renewable Energy: Future Prospects in the UK, Energy Paper 62. London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  3. DTI. (1994b). Energy Technologies for the UK, Energy Paper 61. London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  4. DTI. (1999). New and Renewable Energy: Prospects for the 21st Century, Consultation Paper. London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  5. Eggar, T. (1994). DTI Press Release 31/3/94. London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  6. Elliott, D. (1990). New Technology and Restructuring in the UK Energy Industry: The Case of Renewable Energy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2(3), 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elliott, D. (1992). Renewables and the Privatisation of the UK ESI. Energy Policy, 20(3), 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elliott, D. (1994a). UK Renewable Energy Strategy: The Need for Longer Term Support. Energy Policy, 22(12), 1067–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elliott, D. (1994b). Public Reactions to Windfarms: The Dynamics of Opinion Formation. Energy & Environment, 5(4), 343–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elliott, D. (1996). Technology Foresight: An Interim Review of the UK Exercise. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 8(2), 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elliott, D. (1997 & 2003). Energy, Society and Environment. London: Routledge, 1997 Edition On line at: https://docslide.us/documents/energy-society-and-environment-routledge-introductions-to-environment.html
  12. Elliott, D. (1999a). Technology Foresight and Renewable Energy: The Next Generation, Technology Policy Group Occasional Paper 28. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
  13. Elliott, D. (1999b). Prospects for Renewable Energy and Green Energy Markets in the UK. Renewable Energy, 6, 1268–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliott, D. (2000). Green Power and the Liberalisation of the UK Electricity Market. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 20(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ETSU. (1992). A Review of Wave Energy, The Thorpe Report, Energy Technology Support Unit, R72. London: Department of Energy.Google Scholar
  16. ETSU. (1993a). Tidal Stream Energy Review, Energy Technology Support Unit, Report 05/00155. Harwell.Google Scholar
  17. ETSU. (1993b). Attitudes Towards Windpower: A Survey of Opinion in Cornwall and Devon, ETSU, W/13/00 354/038/REP. HarwellGoogle Scholar
  18. ETSU. (1994). An Assessment of Renewable Energy for the UK, R82, Energy Technology Support Unit. London: Department of Energy.Google Scholar
  19. Lee, T., Wren, B., & Hickman, M. (1989). Public Responses to the Siting and Operation of Wind Turbines. Robens Institute and Department of Psychology, University of Surrey.Google Scholar
  20. Mitchell, C. (2000). The England and Wales Non-Fossil Fuel Obligation: History and Lessons. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25, 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. New Scientist. (1990, April 14). Sorry, Ducks. New Scientist. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg12617122-300-sorry-ducks/
  22. OST. (1995). Technology Foresight: Progress Through Partnership, Report No. 13. London: Energy, Office of Science and Technology, Department for Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  23. OST. (1999). Energies from the Sea- Towards 2020. London: A Marine Foresight Panel Report, Office of Science and Technology, Department for Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  24. REAC. (1992). Renewable Energy Advisory Group Report to the DTI on Renewable Energy, Energy Paper 60. London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  25. Renew. (1998a). NFFO-5: The Biggest Yet. Renew 116, Nov–Dec. Renew On-line 17. http://eeru.open.ac.uk/natta/rol17.htm
  26. Renew. (1998b). Sea Energy Rules Again. Renew 114, July–Aug, Renew On-line 15. http://eeru.open.ac.uk/natta/rol15.htm
  27. Ridley, M. (1994, February 6). Column on Wind Farms. Daily Telegraph.Google Scholar
  28. Roberts, J., Elliott, D., & Houghton, T. (1991). Privatising Electricity: The Politics of Power. London: Belhaven.Google Scholar
  29. Ross, D. (1990, November 10). Technology: Europe Misled Over Wave Energy. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg12817423-500-technology-europe-misled-over-wave-energy/
  30. Select Committee on Energy. (1992). Renewable Energy. Session 1991–92, Fourth Report, House of Commons Select Committee on Energy, London.Google Scholar
  31. SERA. (1995). Data Reproduced in SERA’s Journal New Ground 44, Based on a Parliamentary Answer. London: Socialist Resources and Environment Association.Google Scholar
  32. Spicer, M. (1988, January 13). Parliamentary Answer. Hansard, 125, cc 96-8W/296W. https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/written-answers/1988/jan/13/alternative-sources-of-energy
  33. Thorpe, T. (1998). Overview of Wave Energy Technologies. Harwell: AEA Technology.Google Scholar
  34. Wilson, B. (2001, November 21). Parliamentary Answer, Support for Renewables. Hansard, Col 300-01W. Holding Answer, November 7 Col. 306W. https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/written-answers/2001/nov/21/renewable-energy#S6CV0375P0_20011121_CWA_200

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations