Advertisement

Toward a Context-Aware Serendipitous Recommendation System

  • Changhun Lee
  • Gyumin Lee
  • Chiehyeon LimEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

Recommendation system development has been an important domain in the industrial and academic fields for the past two decades. Recently, the importance of developing a context-aware serendipitous recommendation system has emerged. As such, we investigate the latent features of items that may be recognized by the users of such a system. We assume that users will move from one item to another through the latent features reflected in the sequence of items. Our work specifically focuses on the process of predicting the sequential and changing taste of users. We show the existence of latent features by presenting a topic map and suggest a context-aware serendipitous recommendation system.

References

  1. 1.
    Ziegler CN, et al. Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In: Proceeding WWW’05 proceedings of the 14th international conference on world wide web. 2005. p. 22–32.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Herlocker JL, et al. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans Inf Syst (TOIS). 2004;22(1):5–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ge M, et al. Beyond accuracy: evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity. In: RecSys’10 proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on recommender systems. 2010. p. 257–60.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McNee SM. Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In: Proceeding CHI EA’06 CHI’06 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. 2006. p. 1097–1101.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Toms EG. Serendipitous information retrieva. In: DELOS workshop: information seeking, searching and querying in digital libraries. 2000. p. 17–20.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lathia N, et al. Temporal diversity in recommender systems. In: SIGIR’10 proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. 2010. p. 210–7.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang Y, et al. Auralist: introducing serendipity into music recommendation. In: Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. 2012. p. 13–22.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Collins AM, Loftus EF. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychol Rev. 1975;82(6):407–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Quillian MR. Word concepts: a theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities. Behav Sci. 1967;12.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blei DM, et al. Latent Dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res. 2003;3:993–1022.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mikolov T, et al. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space, arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781. 2013.
  12. 12.
    Harper FM, Konstan JA. The movielens datasets: history and context. ACM Trans Interact Intell Syst. 2015; 5(4):1–19, Article 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management EngineeringUlsan National Institute of Science and TechnologyUlsanRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations