Advertisement

Key Points of Sustainability and CSR: Stakeholder Theory and the Theory of External Effects

  • Henry Schäfer
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Finance book series (BRIEFSFINANCE)

Abstract

Based on the previous discussions of finance and capital market theory and their links to ethics and morality, a sketch of the pivotal role of the theory of external effects on many areas of corporate social responsibility and sustainability is presented. It is argued that the internalization of external effects in a globally integrated world faces severe shortcomings due to a governance vacuum in the enforcement of national laws and taxes. The upcoming paradigm of sustainable development together with corporate social responsibility in conjunction with stakeholder theory allows a civil society-based approach to cope with the challenges of external outcomes. Stakeholders and nongovernmental organizations are discussed as agents that could stimulate and even sanction firms to act sustainably. The threat to withdraw their licenses to operate or to co-operate plays a major role in this approach.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility Sustainable development External effects Coase theorem Pigou tax Governance vacuum Eco-efficiency License to operate 

Bibliography

  1. Atkinson G (2000) Measuring corporate sustainability. J Environ Plan Manag 43(2):235–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ban Ki-moon (2012) Remarks to “KPMG Summit: Business Perspective for Sustainable Growth”. https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2012-02-14/remarks-%E2%80%9Ckpmg-summit-business-perspective-sustainable-growth%E2%80%9D. Accessed 4 Aug 2018
  3. Baumol WJ (1968) On the social rate of discount. Am Econ Rev 58(4):788–802Google Scholar
  4. Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry T, Carson L, White S (2003) We are all stakeholders: participatory decision-making and corporate sustainability. Contribution to the Corporate Social Responsibility & Environment conference, University of Leeds, UK, 30 June–1 July 2003Google Scholar
  6. Besley T, Ghatak M (2007) Retailing public goods: the economics of corporate social responsibility. J Public Econ 91(9):1645–1663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowen H (1953) Social responsibilities of the businessman. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Buritt R, Schaltegger S (2001) Eco-efficiency in corporate budgeting. https://www.leuphana.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Forschungseinrichtungen/csm/files/Arbeitsberichte_etc/05-4downloadversion.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2018
  9. Carroll AB (1999) Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Bus Soc 38(3):268–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheung SNS (1973) The fable of the bees: an economic investigation. J Law Econ 16(1):11–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Creti A, Jouvet PA, Mignon V (2012) Carbon price drivers. Phase I versus phase II equilibrium? Energy Econ 34(1):327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dahlsrud A (2008) How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 15(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dalal-Clayton B (1999) What is sustainable development? http://www.nssd.net/otherdocuments/sustdev2.doc. Accessed 4 Aug 2018
  15. Daly HE (1991) Sustainable development: from conceptual theory towards operational principles. In: Davis K, Bernstam M (eds) Resources, environment, and population: present knowledge, future options. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 25–43Google Scholar
  16. EC (2011) A renewed EU strategy 2011–2014 for corporate social responsibility. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0681:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 6 Sept 2018
  17. Elkington J (1998) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Environ Qual Manag 8(1):37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fombrum CJ, Gardberg NA, Barnett ML (2000) Opportunity platforms and safety nets: corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Bus Soc Rev 105(1):85–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garriga E, Melé D (2004) Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. J Bus Ethics 53:51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giddens A (1998) The third way: the renewal of social democracy. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Global Reporting Initiative (2015) G4 sustainability reporting guidelines. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part1-Reporting-Principles-and-Standard-Disclosures.pdf. Accessed 4 Oct 2018
  22. GLOBESCAN, BSR (2012) State of sustainable business poll 2012. https://www.bsr.org/en/our-insights/report-view/bsr-globescan-state-of-sustainable-business-poll-2012. Accessed 04 Aug 2018
  23. Hopkins M (1998) A planetary bargain: CSR comes of age. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Climate change 2007 – mitigation of climate change: working group III contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kitzmueller M, Shimshack J (2012) Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. J Econ Lit 50(1):51–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. KPMG (2014) A new vision of value. Connecting corporate and societal value creation. http://www.upj.de/nachrichten_detail.81.0.html?&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=2848&tx_ttnews[backPid]=20&cHash=c0c79d2f9a. Accessed 4 Aug 2018
  27. Küpper H-U (2006) Unternehmensethik. Hintergründe, Konzepte, Anwendungen. Schäffer-Poeschel, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  28. Louche C (2004) Ethical investment: process and mechanism of institutionalisation in the Netherlands, 1990–2002. Doctoral Thesis, Erasmus University, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  29. Margolis JD, Walsh JP (2003) Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Adm Sci Q 48(2):268–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meadows DL (2009) Unsere Systeme sind nicht schockresistent (“Our Systems are not resilient”). Interview given in “Finanz und Wirtschaft” 98: 25Google Scholar
  31. Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Meadows DH, Randers J, Meadows DL (2009) The limits to growth: the 30-year update. Chelsea Green, White River Junction, VTGoogle Scholar
  33. New Climate Economy (2016) The sustainable infrastructure imperative: financing for better growth and development. The 2016 new climate economy report. http://newclimateeconomy.report/2016/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2014/08/NCE_2016Report.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2018
  34. Nordhaus WD, Tobin J (1972) Is growth obsolete? vol 96. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York http://www.nber.org/chapters/c3621. Accessed 6 Oct 2018Google Scholar
  35. OECD (2003) Emerging systemic risks – final report to the OECD futures project, ParisGoogle Scholar
  36. Paul CM, Siegel D (2006) Corporate social responsibility and economic performance. J Prod Anal 26(3):207–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pearce D, Atkinson G (1998) The concept of sustainable development: an evaluation of its usefulness ten years after Brundtland. Swiss J Econ Stat 134(3):251–269Google Scholar
  38. Pigou AC (2002) Wealth and welfare, revised version of AC Pigou, Wealth and Welfare (1912). Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. PWC (2016) Integrated reporting in Germany: The Dax 30 benchmark survey 2015. https://www.pwc.de/de/rechnungslegung/assets/studie-integrated-reporting-2015.pdf. Accessed 6 Sept 2018
  40. Reed DJ (2001) Stalking the elusive business case for corporate sustainability. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  41. Renn O, Klinke A (2004) Systemic risks: a new challenge for risk management. EMBO Rep 5(Suppl. 1):41–S46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Russo MV, Fouts PA (1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad Manag J 40(3):534–559Google Scholar
  43. Salzmann AJ (2013) The integration of sustainability into the theory and practice of finance: an overview of the state of the art and outline of future developments. J Bus Econ 83(6):555–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schäfer H (2009) Corporate social responsibility rating. In: Aras G, Crowther D (eds) A handbook of corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. Gower Publishing, Surrey, pp 449–465Google Scholar
  45. Schäfer, H (2012) Sustainable finance. A conceptual outline, University of Stuttgart, BWI/Abt. III, Working Paper Series, No. 03/2012. http://ssrn.com/author=432903. Accessed 6 Sept 2018
  46. Schmidheiny S, Zorraquin FJL (1996) Financing change: the financial community, eco-efficiency, and sustainable development. MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  47. Stern NH (2007) The economics of climate change – the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stiglitz J (1974) Growth with exhaustible natural resources: efficient and optimal growth paths. Rev Econ Stud 41 (128) (Special Issue): 123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. UNEP (2011) Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication – a synthesis for policy makers. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=400&nr=126&menu=1515. Accessed 9 Sept 2018
  50. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) (1998) Kyoto protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/kpeng.pdf. Accessed 9 Sept 2018
  51. World Bank (2012) Turn down the heat – why a 4°C warmer world must be avoided. http://climatechange.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/Turn_Down_the_heat_Why_a_4_degree_centrigrade_warmer_world_must_be_avoided.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2018
  52. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. http://www.unric.org/html/german/entwicklung/rio5/brundtland/A_42_427.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2018

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry Schäfer
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Business AdministrationUniversity of StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations