Advertisement

ViTA: Virtual Trainer for Aging

  • Pietro Leo
  • Grazia D’OnofrioEmail author
  • Daniele Sancarlo
  • Francesco Ricciardi
  • Michele De Petris
  • Francesco Giuliani
  • Giuseppe Ciarambino
  • Silvia Peschiera
  • Angelo Failla
  • Fabrizio Renzi
  • Antonio Greco
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 540)

Abstract

ViTA (Virtual Training for Aging) is an experimental system that aims to strengthen the memory of the people who suffer the first symptoms of dementia and feel the risk of losing their ability to recall significant events in their lives due to the progression of the disease. ViTA exploits concepts of the reminiscence and behavioral therapies to improve cognitive, emotional and social functioning by supporting patients with dementia. Caregivers interact with ViTA to collect fragments of memory and organize them into a knowledge map in which each fragment is linked to the other through emotionally significant stories. A conversational interface allows the navigation of the knowledge map referring to each patient. Thanks to the Artificial Intelligence algorithms implemented in ViTA, patients can access the system to review their memories and stories, leveraging on a conversational interface based on speech and textual interaction modalities in addition to a more traditional interactive interface. ViTA will be tested and verified over the next months by a group of elderly people with early dementia symptoms at the Geriatrics Department and Long Term Care facilities of the Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Research Hospital and it is implemented on top of the IBM Watson platform integrated with software tools derived by previous research experiences.

Keywords

Dementia Memory loss Caregivers Quality of life Quality of care Isolation reduction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research described in this article has been developed thanks to the collaboration between the IBM Italia Foundation and the IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Research Hospital within the IBM Impact Grants Program.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. Dementia. Posted December 17, 2017. http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia. Accessed September 2, 2018.
  2. 2.
    D’Onofrio, G., Sancarlo, D., Addante, F., Ciccone, F., Cascavilla, L., Paris, F., et al. (2015). Caregiver burden characterization in patients with Alzheimer’s disease or vascular dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 30(9), 891–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    IBM Institute Business Value. Loneliness and the aging population. How businesses and governments can address a looming crisis. (2017). https://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/gb/en/gbe03834usen/gbe03834usen-01_GBE03834USEN.pdf.
  4. 4.
    Bottino, C. M., Carvalho, I. A., Alvarez, A. M., Avila, R., Zukauskas, P. R., Bustamante, S. E., et al. (2005). Cognitive rehabilitation combined with drug treatment in Alzheimer’s disease patients: a pilot study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 19(8), 861–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Acevedo, A., & Loewenstein, D. A. (2007). Non pharmacological cognitive interventions in aging and dementia. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 20, 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Raggi, A., Iannaccone, S., Marcone, A., Ginex, V., Ortelli, P., Nonis, A., et al. (2007). The effects of a comprehensive rehabilitation program of Alzheimer’s disease in a hospital setting. Behavioural Neurology, 18(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miotto, E. C., Serrao, V. T., Guerra, G. B., de Lúcia, M. C. S., & Scaff, M. (2008). Cognitive rehabilitation of neuropsychological deficits and mild cognitive impairment. Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 2(2), 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilson, B. A. (2002). Towards a comprehensive model of cognitive rehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 12(2), 97–110.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilson, B. A. (1997). Cognitive rehabilitation: How it is and how it might be. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3(5), 487–496.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ito, T., Meguro, K., Akanuma, K., Ishii, H., & Mori, E. (2007). A randomized con-trolled trial of the group reminiscence approach in patients with vascular dementia. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 24(1), 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, J. J. (2007). Group reminiscence therapy for cognitive and affective function of demented elderly in Taiwan. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 22(12),1235–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D’Onofrio, G., Sancarlo, D., Addante, F., Ciccone, F., Cascavilla, L., Paris, F., et al. (2015). A pilot randomized controlled trial evaluating an integrated treatment of rivastigmine transdermal patch and cognitive stimulation in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 30(9), 965–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Finnema, E., Dröes, R. M., Ribbe, M., & Van Tilburg, W. (2000). The effects of emotion-oriented approaches in the care for persons suffering from dementia: a review of the literature. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15(2), 141–161.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D’Onofrio, G., Sancarlo, D., Seripa, D., Ricciardi, F., Giuliani, F., Panza, F., et al. (2016). Non-pharmacological approaches in the treatment of Dementia. In D. V. Moretti (Ed.), Update on dementia (pp. 477–449). Rijeka, Croati: InTech.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D’Onofrio, G., Sancarlo, D., Ricciardi, F., Ruan, Q., Yu, Z., Giuliani, F., et al. (2016). Cognitive stimulation and Information-Communication Technologies (ICT) in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review. In P. Garza (Ed.), Cognitive control: Development, assessment and performance (pp. 1–13). New York: Nova Science Publisher.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hutchinson, R. (1986). Alternative to punishment: Solving behaviour problems with non-aversive strategies. In G. W. LaVigna, & A. M. Donnellan (Eds.). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moniz-Cook, E., Agar, S., Silver, M., Woods, R., Wang, M., Elston, C., et al. (1998). Can staff training reduce behavioural problems in residential care for the elderly mentally ill? International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 13(3), 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Douglas, S., James, I., & Ballard, C. (2004). Non-pharmacological interventions in dementia. Advances in psychiatric treatment, 10(3), 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Emerson, E., Thompson, S., Reeves, D., Henderson, D., & Robertson, J. (1995). Descriptive analysis of multiple response topographies of challenging behaviour across two settings. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16(4), 301–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Burgio, L. D., & Fisher, S. E. (2000). Application of psychosocial interventions for treating behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia. International Psychogeriatrics, 12(1), 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Woods, R. T. (1999). Psychological problems of ageing. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Morris, J. C. (1993). The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules. Neurology, 43(11), 2412–2414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rouleau, I., Salmon, D. P., Butters, N., Kennedy, C., & McGuire, K. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative analyses of clock drawings in Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s disease. Brain and Cognition, 18(1), 70–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dubois, B., Slachevsky, A., Litvan, I., & Pillon, B. (2000). The FAB: A frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology, 55(11), 1621–1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cummings, J. L., Mega, M., Gray, K., Rosenberg-Thompson, S., Carusi, D. A., & Gornbein, J. (1994). The neuropsychiatric inventory: Comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology, 44(12), 2308–2314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 23, 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Katz, S., Downs, T. D., Cash, H. R., & Grotz, R. C. (1970). Progress in the development of an index of ADL. The Gerontologist, 10(1), 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9(3), 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pfeiffer, E. (1975). A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 23(10), 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parmelee, P. A., Thuras, P. D., Katz, I. R., & Lawton, M. P. (1995). Validation of the cumulative illness rating scale in a geriatric residential population. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 43(2), 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vellas, B., Guigoz, Y., Garry, P. J., Nourhashemi, F., Bennahum, D., Lauque, S., et al. (1999). The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and its use in grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Nutrition, 15(2), 116–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bliss, M. R., McLaren, R., & Exton-Smith, A. N. (1966). Mattresses for preventing pressure sores in geriatric patients. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service, 25, 238–268.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Novak, M., & Guest, C. (1989). Application of a multidimensional caregiver burden inventory. The Gerontologist, 29(6), 798–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & A. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research & Business UnitIBMItalyItaly
  2. 2.Geriatric Unit, Department of Medical SciencesFondazione Casa Sollievo della SofferenzaSan Giovanni RotondoItaly
  3. 3.The BioRobotics InstituteScuola Superiore Sant’AnnaPontederaItaly
  4. 4.ICT, Innovation and Research UnitFondazione Casa Sollievo della SofferenzaSan Giovanni Rotondo, FoggiaItaly

Personalised recommendations