Advertisement

The Role of Social Robots in Public Space

  • Leopoldina FortunatiEmail author
  • Filippo Cavallo
  • Mauro Sarrica
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 540)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to understand what might be today—on the edge of the social robotics era—the role of robots in public spaces. In Europe, there was a strong tradition of automata exhibition in the ‘600 and 700’ with ostensive purpose. Exposing automata in various fairs was meant to inspire awe towards the advancement of technology and science in the public who attended numerous public events. This study aims to investigate whether in the modern world the robot may have the same or other functions in public space. The study has analyzed the public display of the robot DORO: a technological artifact created by the Sant’Anna School during the European project ROBOT-ERA. Two distinct public moments were examined. The first was the night of researchers in Pisa on 30 September 2016 in Martiri della Libertà’s square, where DORO was exhibited to the public. The second occasion was the inauguration of the 39th academic year of the University of Udine. On this occasion, DORO brought to the rector his inaugural lecture and exchanged—in front of a large auditorium—a brief dialogue with the rector of the University of Udine, prof. Alberto de Toni.

Keywords

Social robot Public space Public events Social robot role in public space Social robot audiences 

References

  1. 1.
    de Graaf, M. M. A., Ben Allouch, S., & Jan van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017). Long-term evaluation of a social robot in real homes. Interaction Studies, 17(3), 462–491.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sakaki, T., Shimokawa, T., Ushimi, N., Murakami, K., Lee, Y.-K., Tsuruta, K., et al. (2015). Rehabilitation robot in primary walking pattern training for SCI patient at home. International Journal of Medical, Health, Biomedical, Bioengineering and Pharmaceutical Engineering, 9(6), 513–517.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aquilano, M., Cavallo, F. et al. (2012, August). Ambient assisted living and ageing: Preliminary results of RITA project. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE (pp. 5823–5826). IEEE.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fortunati, L., Esposito, A., Ferrin, G., & Viel, M. (2014). Approaching social robots through playfulness and doing-it-yourself: children in action. Cognitive Computation, 6(4), 789–801.  https://doi.org/10.1007/S12559-014-9303-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fortunati, L., Esposito, A., Sarrica, M., & Ferrin, G. (2015). Children’s knowledge and imaginary about robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7(5), 685–695.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0316-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mondada, F., Bonani, M., Riedo, F., Briod, M., Pereyre, L., Retornaz, P., et al. (2017). Bringing robotics into formal education using the Thymio open source hardware robot. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, March, 77–85.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2016.2636372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paradeda, RB, Martinho, C., & Paiva, A. (2017). Persuasion based on personality traits: Using a social robot as storyteller. In Proceeding HRI ‘17. Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 367–368.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jensen, B., Tomatis, N., Mayor, L., Drygajlo, A., & Siegwart, R. (2005). Robots meet humans-interaction in public spaces. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 52(6), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Niemelä, M., Heikkilä, P., & Lammi, H. (2017) A social service robot in a shopping mall: Expectations of the management, retailers and consumers. In Proceeding HRI ‘17. Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 227–228.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Salvini, P. (2017). Urban robotics: Towards responsible innovations for our cities. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. available online March 30,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2017.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sone, Y. (2016). Japanese robot culture. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cavallo, F., et al. (2014). Development of a socially believable multi-robot solution from town to home. Cognitive Computation, 6(4), 954–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ferrari, G. A. (1984). Meccanica ‘allargata’. In G. Giannantoni & M. Vegetti (Eds.), La scienza ellenistica (pp. 225–296). Napoli: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fortunati, L. (2013). Afterword: Robot conceptualizations between continuity and innovation, intervalla: platform for intellectual exchange 1, “Social Robots and Emotion: Transcending the Boundaries between Humans and ICTs” (pp. 116–129). ISSN 2296–3413. http://www.fus.edu/intervalla/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=18&Itemid=15.
  15. 15.
    Parlato, E. (1991). Il Volto dell’Utopia: modi e significato dell’automa rinascimentale. In U. Artioli & F. Bartoli (Eds.), Il mito dell’automa (pp. 26–30). Firenze: Artificio.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rinaldi, A. (1979). La ricerca della ‘terza’ natura: artificialia e naturalia nel giardino toscano del ‘500. In M. Fagiolo (Ed.), Natura e artificio (pp. 154–175). Roma: Officina Edizioni.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zanca, A. (1991). Il mondo degli automi tra manierismo e secolo dei lumi. In U. Artioli & F. Bartoli (Eds.), Il mito dell’automa (pp. 31–39). Artificio: Firenze.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baron, N. (2013). Authenticity, emotions, and ICTs. Intervalla: Platform for Intellectual Exchange, 1, 7–16.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fortunati, L., Esposito, A., & Lugano, G. (2015). Introduction to the special issue “Beyond industrial robotics: Social robots entering public and domestic spheres”. The Information Society, 31(3), 229–236,  https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2015.1020195. Published online: May 13, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fortunati, L. (2016). Moving robots from industrial sectors to domestic spheres: A foreword. In Anna Esposito & Lakhmi Jain (Eds.), Modeling emotions in robotic socially believable behaving systems (pp. 1–3). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fortunati, L. (2013). The mobile phone between fashion and design. Mobile Media and Communication, 1(1), 102–109.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157912459497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cavallo, F., Aquilano, M. et al. (2011, August). Multidisciplinary approach for developing a new robotic system for domiciliary assistance to elderly people. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE (pp. 5327–5330). IEEE.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Katz, J. E., & Sugiyama, S. (2005). Mobile phones as fashion statements: The co-creation of mobile communication’s public meaning. In R. Ling & P. Pedersen (Eds.), Mobile communications: Re-negotiation of the social sphere (pp. 63–81). Surrey, UK: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Amsterdamski, S. (1980). Naturale/artificiale, voce dell’Enciclopedia Einaudi, 9, 792–821.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Foucault, M. (1976–84). Histoire de la sexualité (3 voll). Paris: Editions Gallimard.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Canter, D. (1977). The psychology of place. London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gustafson, P. (2001). Meanings of place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 5–16.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life, New York (tr. it.: La vita quotidiana come rappresentazione, Bologna 1969).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bagnasco, A. (2001). Organizzazione sociale dello spazio. Voce dell’ Enciclopedia delle Scienze Sociali. I Supplemento. Roma: Treccani.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Di Masso, A. (2012). Grounding citizenship: Toward a political psychology of public space. Political Psychology, 33(1), 123–143.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00866.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Purini, F. (2007). Spazio pubblico. Voce dell’Enciclopedia Italiana, VII. Appendice. Roma: Treccani.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lo Monaco, G., Piermattéo, A., Rateau, P., & Tavani, J. L. (2017). Methods for studying the structure of social representations: A critical review and agenda for future research. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour47(3), 306–331. http://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ratinaud, P. (2009). IRAMUTEQ: Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaireshttp://www.iramuteq.org.
  34. 34.
    Bonaccorsi, M., Fiorini, L., Cavallo, F., Saffiotti, A., & Dario, P. (2016). A cloud robotics solution to improve social assistive robots for active and healthy aging. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(3), 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Di Nuovo, A., Broz, F., Belpaeme, T., Cangelosi, A., Cavallo, F., Esposito, R., & Dario, P. (2014, October). A web based multi-modal interface for elderly users of the robot-era multi-robot services. In IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), 2014 (pp. 2186–2191). IEEE.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Contarello, A., Fortunati, L., Sarrica, M. (2007). Social thinking and the mobile phone: a study of social change with the diffusion of mobile phones, using a social representations framework, mobile phone cultures: special issue of continuum. Journal of Media and Culture, edited by Gerard Goggin, 21(2):149–163.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310701268687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fortunati, L., Manganelli, A. (2007). The social representations of telecommunications. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, published online 16 gennaio ( https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-006-0139-7); print version (2008) The social representations of telecommunications. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 12(6), 421–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Taipale, S., Sarrica, M., de Luca, F., & Fortunati, L. (2015). Europeans’ perception of robots implications for social policies. In J. Vincent, S. Taipale, B. Sapio, L. Fortunati, & G. Lugano (Eds.), Social robots from a human perspective (pp. 11–24). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Taipale, S., Vincent, J., Sapio, B., Lugano, G., & Fortunati, L. (2015). Introduction. In J. Vincent, S. Taipale, B. Sapio, G. Lugano, & L. Fortunati (Eds.), Social robots from a human perspective (pp. 1–7). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leopoldina Fortunati
    • 1
    Email author
  • Filippo Cavallo
    • 2
  • Mauro Sarrica
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and PhysicsUniversity of UdineUdineItaly
  2. 2.Scuola Superiore Sant’AnnaBiorobotics InstitutePisaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Communication and Social Research, SapienzaUniversity of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations