Advertisement

Interdiffusion Behavior of FeCrAl with U3Si2

  • Rita E. HogganEmail author
  • Lingfeng He
  • Jason M. Harp
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

Advanced steels, including FeCrAl are being considered as an alternative to the standard light water fuel (LWR) cladding, Zircalloy. FeCrAl has superior mechanical and thermal properties and oxidation resistance relative to the Zircalloy standard . Uranium Silicide (U3Si2) is a candidate to replace uranium oxide (UO2) as LWR fuel because of its higher thermal conductivity and higher fissile density relative to the current standard, UO2. The interdiffusion behavior between FeCrAl and U3Si2 is investigated in this study. Commercially available FeCrAl, along with pellets fabricated at the Idaho National Laboratory were placed in diffusion couples. Individual tests have been run at temperatures ranging from 500 ℃ to 1000 ℃ for 30 h and 100 h. The interdiffusion is analyzed with an optical microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Uniform and planar diffusion regions along the material interface are illustrated with backscatter electron micrographs and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).

Keywords

Accident tolerant fuels U3Si2 FeCrAl Cladding 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the work of INL electron microscopy staff Tammy Trowbridge and James Madden, as well as Michael Heiss and Michael Chapple for their help in design and fabrication of the diffusion couple holders.

References

  1. 1.
    S.B. Sitton et al., Advanced Fuels Campaign Light Water Reactor Accident Tolerant Fuel Performance Metrics,” (Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Advanced Fuels Campaign, INL/EXT-13-29957 FCRD-FUEL-2013-000264, 2014) (https://nuclearfuel.inl.gov/atf/Reports/ATF%20Metrics%20Report%20Feb%202014.pdf)
  2. 2.
    B.A. Pint et al., High temperature oxidation of fuel cladding candidate materials in steam-hydrogen environments. J. Nucl. Mater. 440(1), 420–427 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.M. Harp, P.A. Lessing, R.E. Hoggan, Uranium silicide pellet fabrication by powder metallurgy for accident tolerant fuel evaluation and irradiation. J. Nucl. Mater. 466, 728–738 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.T. White, A.T. Nelson, J.T. Dunwoody, D.J. Safarik, K.J. McClellan, Corrigendum to Thermophysical Properties of U3Si2 to 1773 K [J. Nucl. Mater. 464 (2015) 275–280]. J. Nucl. Mater. 484 386–387 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kanthol.com, Kanthol APMT (Tube) Datasheet, updated 2012 08 16. (http://www.kanthal.com/en/products/material-datasheets/tube/kanthal-apmt/)
  6. 6.
    Nuclear Power Technology Development Section, Thermophysical Properties Database of Materials for Light Water Reactors and Heavy Water Reactors, (Report IAEA-TECDOC-1496, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2006), 91 and 253Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    X. Wu et al., Preliminary safety analysis of the PWR with accident-tolerant fuels during severe accident Conditions. Ann. Nucl. Energy 80, 1–13 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    N.M. George, K. Terrani, J. Powers, Neutronic Analysis of Candidate Accident-Tolerant Iron Alloy Cladding Concepts. (Technical Report ORNL/TM-2013/121, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2013Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K.R. Robb, Analysis of the FeCrAl Accident Tolerant Fuel Concept Benefits during BWR Station Blackout Accidents. (Paper presented at the 16th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics, Chicago, IL, USA, 01 January 2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sudhir Mishra et al., Compatibility Study between U-UO2 Cermet Fuel and T91 Cladding. J. Nucl. Mater. 481, 1–12 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Chatain, C. Guéneau, D. Labroche, J. Rogez, O. Dugne, Thermodynamic assessment of the Fe-U binary system. J. Phase Equilib. 24(2), 122–131 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    C.M. Walter, L.R. Kelman, The interaction of iron with molten Uranium. J. Nucl. Mater. 20(3), 314–322 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M.R. Finlay, G.L. Hofman, J.L. Snelgrove, Irradiation behavior of Uranium Silicide compounds. J. Nucl. Mater. 325(2), 118–128 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Campbell, The Thermodynamic Properties of UFe2: agreement with the Campbell correlation of laves phase compounds. Metall. Trans. A 8A, 1493 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Idaho National LaboratoryIdaho FallsUSA

Personalised recommendations