Advertisement

Frequency Domain Reflectometry Modeling and Measurement for Nondestructive Evaluation of Nuclear Power Plant Cables

  • S. W. GlassEmail author
  • L. S. Fifield
  • A. M. Jones
  • T. S. Hartman
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

Cable insulation polymers are among the more susceptible materials to age-related degradation within a nuclear power plant. This is recognized by both regulators and utilities, so all plants have developed cable aging management programs to detect damage before critical component failure in compliance with regulatory guidelines. Although a wide range of tools is available to evaluate cables and cable systems, cable aging management programs vary in how condition monitoring and nondestructive examination is conducted as utilities search for the most reliable and cost-effective ways to assess cable system condition. Frequency domain reflectometry (FDR) is emerging as one valuable tool to locate and assess damaged portions of a cable system with minimal cost and only requires access in most cases to one of the cable terminal ends. This work examines a physics-based model of a cable system and relates it to FDR measurements for a better understanding of specific damage influences on defect detectability.

Keywords

Cable modeling Frequency domain reflectometry Nondestructive evaluation 

References

  1. 1.
    S.A. Glass et al., Bulk Electrical Cable non Destructive Examination Methods for Nuclear Power Plant Cable Aging Management Programs (Report PNNL-25634, Richland, Washington, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Furse et al., Frequency-domain reflectometry for on-board testing of aging aircraft wiring. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 45(2), 306–315 (2003). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMC.2003.811305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mohr and Associates, in Application Note: TDR vs. FDR: Distance-to-Fault (Mohr and Associates, Richland, Washington, 2010). Available at http://www.mohr-engineering.com/TDR_vs_FDR_Distance_to_Fault-A.php
  4. 4.
    J. Minet et al., A generalized frequency domain reflectometry modeling technique for soil electrical properties determination. Vadose Zone J. 9(4), 1063–1072 (2010). doi: https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2010.0004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K.L. Murty (ed.), in Materials Ageing and Degradation in Light Water Reactors: Mechanisms and Management (Cambridge, United Kingdom, Woodhead Publishing, 2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ANSYS, in Application Brief: Power Cable Analysis (Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, ANSYS, Inc., 2014). Available at http://resource.ansys.com/staticassets/ANSYS/staticassets/resourcelibrary/techbrief/ab-power-cable-analysis.pdf. Accessed 29 March 2017
  7. 7.
    A. Strikwerda, in Model Cables and Transmission Lines in COMSOL Multiphysics (Burlington, Massachusetts, COMSOL, Inc., 2016). Available at https://www.comsol.com/blogs/model-cables-and-transmission-lines-in-comsol-multiphysics/. Accessed 29 March 2017
  8. 8.
    M.K. Johnson, Calculation of Transmission Line Impedances Using the ANSYS Finite Element Program (Report TM-1270, Batavia, Illinois, Fermilab, 1984). Available at http://lss.fnal.gov/archive/tm/TM-1270.pdf
  9. 9.
    Q. Chen et al., Capacitance of water tree modeling in underground cables. J Power Eng 2(11), 9–18 (2014). doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/jpee.2014.211002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Alsharif et al., FEM Modeling of Electric Field and Potential Distributions of MV XLPE Cables Containing Void Defect (Paper presented at the 2012 COMSOL Conference, Milan, Italy, 10–12 October 2012). Available at https://www.comsol.com/paper/fem-modeling-of-electric-field-and-potential-distributions-of-mv-xlpe-cables-con-13431
  11. 11.
    J. Brown et al., Submerged Medium Voltage Cable Systems at Nuclear Power Plants: A Review of Research Efforts Relevant to Aging Mechanisms and Condition Monitoring (Report SAND2015—1794, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Sandia National Laboratories, 2015). doi: https://doi.org/10.2172/1177756
  12. 12.
    P.F. Fantoni, A. Nordlund, Wire System Aging Assessment and Condition Monitoring (WASCO) (Report NKS-130, Roskilde, Denmark, Nordic Nuclear Safety Research 2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    General Cable, in Industrial Cable, SPEC 4325 (General Cable, 2016). Available at http://viewer.epaperflip.com/Viewer.aspx?docid=848fb272-4ff4-45b2-b702-a69e0113edcc#?page=38. Accessed 29 March 2017
  14. 14.
    S.A. Glass et al., Physics-Based Modeling of Cable Insulation Conditions for Frequency Domain Reflectometry (FDR) (Report PNNL-26493, Richland, Washington, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. W. Glass
    • 1
    Email author
  • L. S. Fifield
    • 1
  • A. M. Jones
    • 1
  • T. S. Hartman
    • 1
  1. 1.Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryRichlandUSA

Personalised recommendations