Advertisement

Electrical Potential Drop Observations of Fatigue Crack Closure

  • E. A. WestEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

Fatigue crack closure is widely recognized to promote fatigue crack growth retardation behavior through contacting of fracture surfaces in the crack wake and the resulting reduction in the effective stress intensity factor range (∆K) that promotes crack advance. Experimental measurements of crack closure are typically made using conventional compliance methods, but electrical potential drop has also been used to characterize crack closure behavior. Electrical potential drop measurements have detected electrical shorting across fracture surfaces of stainless steel, nickel base weld, and A508 steel tested in high temperature water environments under cyclic loads. These observations have consistently occurred under loading conditions (low R, following overloads) where closure effects are expected to be prominent and have been shown to correlate with reductions in fatigue crack growth rate. These findings suggest that electrical potential drop measurements may serve as a useful tool in assessing the influence of crack closure on corrosion fatigue retardation behavior.

Keywords

Corrosion fatigue Crack closure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

David Morton and Carl Tackes are gratefully acknowledged for their detailed troubleshooting analysis of autoclave experiment results that allowed for the identification of the EPD crack closure measurements. The operators of the Science Autoclave Facility (Bruce Handerhan and Samantha Holtzer) are gratefully acknowledged for performing the autoclave experiments.

References

  1. 1.
    T.L. Anderson, Fracture mechanics fundamentals and applications, 3rd edn. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. Elber, Fatigue crack closure under cyclic tension. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2, 37–45 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    ASTM International, ASTM E647-15ε1 : Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates. 2016, ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 1–50Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E.A. West, C. Tackes, G. Newsome, N. Lewis, Influence of sulfur and ferrite on SCC and corrosion fatigue behavior of model heats of stainless steel, in 17th International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems—Water Reactors, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 2015Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Kemp, Fatigue Crack Closure—A Review. 1990, Royal Aerospace EstablishmentGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Elber, The significance of fatigue crack closure, in Damage Tolerance in Aircraft Structures, Special Technical Publication 486. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp. 230–242Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Stoychev, D. Kujawski, Methods for crack opening load and crack tip shielding determination: a review. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 26, 1053–1067 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Schijve, Fatigue Crack Closure: Observations and Technical Significance, in Mechanics of Fatigue Crack Closure, ed. by J.C. Newman Jr., W. Elber (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1988), pp. 5–34 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. Bachmann, D. Munz, Fatigue crack closure evaluation with the potential method. Eng. Fract. Mech. 11, 61–71 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T.T. Shih, R.P. Wei, A study of crack closure in fatigue. Eng. Fract. Mech. 6, 19–32 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Naval Nuclear LaboratoryWest MifflinUSA

Personalised recommendations