The Use of Tapered Specimens to Evaluate the SCC Initiation Susceptibility in Alloy 182 in BWR and PWR Environments

  • Juxing BaiEmail author
  • Stefan Ritter
  • Hans-Peter Seifert
  • Marc Vankeerberghen
  • Rik-Wouter Bosch
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)


A better understanding of stress corrosion cracking (SCC) initiation is one of the keys towards developing proactive mitigation techniques for the safe and economic operation of nuclear power plants. However, SCC initiation laboratory studies are very time consuming and require multiple specimens, Hence, in the framework of the European “MICRIN+” research project, an accelerated test method was evaluated for screening the SCC susceptibility in a relatively short time frame. The effects of surface roughness and strain rate on SCC initiation susceptibility in Alloy 182 weld metal were evaluated in simulated BWR and PWR environments. Constant extension rate tensile tests were performed using flat tapered tensile specimens with different surface finishes (ground and polished) in hydrogenated water at 288 and 340 °C. The surface crack distribution and crack length as well as stress thresholds for SCC initiation were analyzed by detailed post-test quantitative characterization. Some test data were analyzed by the EngInit SCC initiation model. The accelerated test technique was successfully applied and revealed very promising results. The highest crack density and lowest stress thresholds for crack initiation were found on the ground surfaces and at the lowest strain rates. A test’s load response can be fed to the EngInit model; with parameters to be determined by comparing EngInit’s damage to the experimental surface crack distributions. EngInit can potentially be used to link laboratory test results on flat tapered specimens to SCC initiation in components in the field.


Stress corrosion cracking Ni-base alloy BWR PWR Hydrogen Surface finish Initiation Constant extension rate tensile test SCC initiation modeling 



Tracteble Engineering (Belgium) is gratefully acknowledged for providing the Alloy 182 test material. The research leading to these results was partly funded by the European Atomic Energy Community’s (Euratom) Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007–2013 under grant agreement No. 604965. Thanks are also expressed to Yong-Lin Chen (National Tsing-Hua University, Taiwan) and Beat Baumgartner (PSI) for their experimental support.


  1. 1.
    O. Runevall, J. Lejon, M. Olsson, K. Tompuri, M. Bjurman, Water chemistry options for internal pump BWRs—the Nordic operational experience, in 20th NPC International Conference, Brighton, UK, 2016Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H.P. Seifert, S. Ritter, H.J. Leber, S. Roychowdhury, Stress corrosion cracking behavior in the transition region of Alloy 182/low-alloy reactor pressure vessel steel dissimilar metal weld joints in light water reactor environments. Corrosion 71, 433–454 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H.P. Seifert, S. Ritter, T. Shoji, Q.J. Peng, Y. Takeda, Z.P. Lu, Environmentally-assisted cracking behaviour in the transition region of an alloy182/SA 508 Cl.2 dissimilar metal weld joint in simulated boiling water reactor normal water chemistry environment. J. Nucl. Mater. 378, 197–210 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.M. Horn, P.L. Andresen, J. Hickling, BWR Alloy 182 stress corrosion cracking experience, in 5th Int. Symposium on Contribution of Materials Investigation to the Resolution of Problems Encountered in Pressurized Water Reactors (Fontevraud 5), Fontevraud, France, 2002, pp. 55–67Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Hänninen, P. Aaltonen, A. Brederholm, U. Ehrnstén, H. Gripenberg, A. Toivonen, I. Virkkunen, Dissimilar metal weld joints and their performance in nuclear power plant and oil refinery conditions, in VTT Research Notes, VTT, Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland, 2006Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Pathania, A.R. McIlree, J. Hickling, Overview of primary water cracking of Alloys 182/82 in PWRs, in: 5th Int. Symposium on Contribution of Materials Investigation to the Resolution of Problems Encountered in Pressurized Water Reactors (Fontevraud 5), Fontevraud, France, 2002, pp. 13–27Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Gutti, G. Moffatt, A. McIlree, Metallurgical investigation of cracking in the reactor vessel alpha loop hot leg nozzle to pipe weld at the V.C. summer station, in: Fontevraud 5 International Symposium, SFEN, Fontevraud, France, 2002, pp. 29–38Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Berge, Importance of surface preparation for corrosion control in nuclear power stations. Mater. Perform. 36, 56–62 (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Berger, R. Kilian, Mitigation of Crack Initiation in LWRs (MICRIN+), in: EUROCORR 2016, EFC, Montpellier, France, 2016Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Arioka, T. Yamada, T. Miyamoto, T. Terachi, Dependence of stress corrosion cracking of alloy 690 on temperature, Cold Work, and Carbide Precipitation-Role of Diffusion of Vacancies at Crack Tips. Corrosion 67, 691–706 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Yamazaki, Z. Lu, Y. Ito, Y. Takeda, T. Shoji, The effect of prior deformation on stress corrosion cracking growth rates of alloy 600 materials in a simulated pressurized water reactor primary water. Corros. Sci. 50, 835–846 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D.J. Paraventi, W.C. Moshier, The effect of cold work and dissolved hydrogen in the stress corrosion cracking of Alloy 82 and Alloy 182 weld metal, in: T.R. Allen, P.J. King, L. Nelson (Eds.) 12th Int. Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems—Water Reactors, Snowbird, UT, USA, 2005, pp. 543–555Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Vankeerberghen, EngInit-A blueprint for an engineering nmodel for time-to-failure of thin-walled, irradiated components of 316 SS under nominal PWR-relevant SCC conditions, personal communications, (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Vankeerberghen, R.-W. Bosch, Towards an engineering model for time-to-failure of irradiated components of 316 SS under nominal PWR-relevant conditions, personal communications, (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juxing Bai
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stefan Ritter
    • 1
  • Hans-Peter Seifert
    • 1
  • Marc Vankeerberghen
    • 2
  • Rik-Wouter Bosch
    • 2
  1. 1.Nuclear Energy and Safety Research DivisionPaul Scherrer Institute (PSI)Villigen PSISwitzerland
  2. 2.SCK•CENMolBelgium

Personalised recommendations