Advertisement

Model Validation for the Absorber

  • Claudio Madeddu
  • Massimiliano Errico
  • Roberto Baratti
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Energy book series (BRIEFSENERGY)

Abstract

In this chapter, the absorption section of two pilot-plant facilities, different in dimensions and operating conditions, is modeled. A discussion on the typical temperature bulge, which gives important indications on the behavior of the absorber, is reported. The Peclet number is evaluated for both the cases with reference to the material and the energy transport and to different characteristic lengths, highlighting that the columns have a plug-flow like behavior. Then, the number of segments analysis is performed in order to obtain the correct representation of the process and investigate the possible effect of the backmixing due to the countercurrent. The proposed model suitably describes the experimental data and particularly the temperature bulge, independently on its location.

References

  1. 1.
    Tontiwachwuthikul P, Meisen A, Lim CJ (1989) Novel pilot plant technique for sizing gas absorbers with chemical reactions. Can J Chem Eng 67(4):602–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tontiwachwuthikul P, Meisen A, Lim CJ (1992) CO2 absorption by NaOH, Monoethanolamine and 2-Amino-2-Methyl-1-Propanol solutions in a packed column. Chem Eng Sci 47(2):381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Razi N, Svendsen HF, Bolland O (2013) Validation of mass transfer correlations for CO2 absorption with MEA using pilot data. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 19:478–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kvamsdal HM, Rochelle GT (2008) Effect of the temperature bulge in CO2 absorption from flue gas by aqueous monoethanolamine. Ind Eng Chem Res 47(3):867–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Errico M, Madeddu C, Pinna D et al (2016) Model calibration for the carbon dioxide-amine absorption system. Appl Energy 183:958–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis ME (1984) Numerical methods and modelling for chemical engineers. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kenig EY, Schneider R, Górak A (1999) Rigorous dynamic modelling of complex reactive absorption processes. Chem Eng Sci 54(21):5195–5203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schneider R, Kenig EY, Górak A (2001) Complex reactive absorption processes: model optimization and dynamic column simulation. Comput Aided Chem Eng 9:285–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Onda K, Takeuchi H, Okumoto Y (1968) Mass transfer coefficients between gas and liquid phases in packed columns. J Chem Eng Jpn 1(1):56–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bravo JL, Ja Rocka, Fair JR (1985) Mass transfer in gauze packings. Hydrocarb Processes 64(1):91–95Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chilton TH, Colburn AP (1934) Mass transfer (absorption) coefficient. Prediction from data on heat transfer and fluid friction. Ind Eng Chem 26(11):1183–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stichlmair J, Bravo JL, Fair JR (1989) General model for prediction of pressure drop and capacity of countercurrent gas/liquid packed columns. Gas Sep Purif 3(1):19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bravo JL, Rocha JA, Fair JR (1992) A comprehensive model for the performance of column containing structured packing. IChEME Symp S 128:A439–A453Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang Y, Chen H, Chen C-C et al (2009) Rate-based process modeling study of CO2 capture with aqueous monoethanolamine solution. Ind Eng Chem Res 48(20):9233–9246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mores P, Scenna N, Mussati S (2012) A rate based model of a packed column for CO2 absorption using aqueous monoethanolamine solution. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 6:21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kucka L, Müller I, Kenig EY, Górak A (2003) On the modelling and simulation of sour gas absorption by aqueous amine solutions. Chem Eng Sci 58(16):3571–3578CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudio Madeddu
    • 1
  • Massimiliano Errico
    • 2
  • Roberto Baratti
    • 3
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, Chimica e dei Materiali, Università di CagliariCagliariItaly
  2. 2.Department of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Technology, University of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark
  3. 3.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, Chimica e dei MaterialiUniversità di CagliariCagliariItaly

Personalised recommendations