Panarchy: Thinking in Systems and Networks

  • Igor Linkov
  • Benjamin D. Trump
Part of the Risk, Systems and Decisions book series (RSD)


As a concept and disciplinary practice, resilience analysis has evolved rapidly within the twenty-first century. This is driven in large part by the growing complexity in everyday systems that dominate daily life, from energy and transportation networks to medical and even entertainment systems. Such complexity is derived to provide potentially vast benefits to society through innovative technology development and organization, and subsequently makes daily life for individuals easier, more enjoyable, or increasingly integrated.


  1. Alexander, D. (2013). Resilience and disaster risk reduction: An etymological journey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 13, 2707–2716. Retrieved from Scholar
  2. Allen, C., Angeler, D., Garmestani, A., Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. (2014). Panarchy: Theory and application (Paper 127). Nebraska Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit—Sta Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Béné, C., Wood, R. G., Newsham, A., & Davies, M. (2012). Resilience: New utopia or new tyranny? Reflection about the potentials and limits of the concept of resilience in relation to vulnerability reduction programmes. IDS Working Papers, 2012(405), 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cutter, S. L. (2016). The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA. Natural Hazards, 80(2), 741–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davoudi, S. (2012). Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gunderson, L. H. (2001). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island press.Google Scholar
  8. Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in systems of humans and nature. Washington, DC: Island.Google Scholar
  9. Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4(5), 390–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Larkin, S., Fox-Lent, C., Eisenberg, D. A., Trump, B. D., Wallace, S., Chadderton, C., & Linkov, I. (2015). Benchmarking agency and organizational practices in resilience decision making. Environment Systems and Decisions, 35(2), 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Linkov, I., Anklam, E., Collier, Z. A., DiMase, D., & Renn, O. (2014a). Risk-based standards: Integrating top–down and bottom–up approaches. Environment Systems and Decisions, 34(1), 134–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Linkov, I., Bridges, T., Creutzig, F., Decker, J., Fox-Lent, C., Kröger, W., & Lambert, J. H. (2014b). Changing the resilience paradigm. Nature Climate Change, 4(6), 407–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Linkov, I., Fox-Lent, C., Keisler, J., Sala, S. D., & Sieweke, J. (2014c). Risk and resilience lessons from Venice. Environment Systems and Decisions, 34(3), 378–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., Ditmer, R., & Hazle, M. (2014d). Munitions and explosives of concern: International governance and applications for the United States. Environmental Sciences Europe, 26(1), 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Linkov, I., Trump, B., Jin, D., Mazurczak, M., & Schreurs, M. (2014e). A decision-analytic approach to predict state regulation of hydraulic fracturing. Environmental Sciences Europe, 26(1), 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Orencio, P. M., & Fujii, M. (2013). A localized disaster-resilience index to assess coastal communities based on an analytic hierarchy process (AHP). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 3, 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sempier, T. T., Swann, D. L., Emmer, R., Sempier, S. H., & Schneider, M. (2010). Coastal community resilience index: A community self assesment (MASGP-08-014).Google Scholar
  18. Simon, H. (1974). The organization of a complex system. In H. H. Patee (Ed.), Hierachy theory. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  19. Todini, E. (2000). Looped water distribution networks design using a resilience index based heuristic approach. Urban Water, 2(2), 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tversky, A. (1975, June). Value theory: An analysis of choices under risk. In a conference on Public Economics, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  21. Ungar, M. (Ed.). (2012). The social ecology of resilience. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Zellmer, S., & Gunderson, L. (2009). Why resilience may not always be a good thing: Lessons in ecosystem restoration from Glen Canyon and the everglades, 87 Nebraska Law Review, 893, 913–923.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Igor Linkov
    • 1
  • Benjamin D. Trump
    • 1
  1. 1.US Army Corps of EngineersConcordUSA

Personalised recommendations