Advertisement

Understanding Resilience of Adult Foster Care Providers

  • Kelly MunlyEmail author
  • Karen A. Roberto
  • Katherine R. Allen
Chapter

Abstract

With the growth of the aging population, and in particular individuals 85 years and older, there is a growing need for a range of long-term care housing and service options. There is also an urgent need to address supportive housing options for citizens aging with disabilities, especially those without the financial resources to pay for their housing and care needs. One such housing option is Adult Foster Care (AFC), a small-setting community-care option that provides older persons and individuals with physical and intellectual disabilities with a home- and family-like environment with opportunity for 24-h care and community integration. AFC varies significantly across states in terms of regulations, name of the service (e.g., adult family care homes, board-and-care homes), financing, and numbers of residents served within an AFC facility. As gatekeepers to services and community engagement for the AFC residents, providers are fundamental to the AFC resident experience, serving as the primary managers of their residences and the responsible party for their residents’ well-being. They are uniquely situated between regulations stemming from policy and the outcomes experienced by the care recipient. In this chapter, we discuss mechanisms for supporting the resilience of AFC care providers.

Keywords

Adult foster care Long-Term care Community-Care Supportive housing Disabilities Frail elders Care providers 

References

  1. AARP Public Policy Institute. (2009). AARP Public Policy Institute in Brief (178). Building adult foster care: What states can do. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Davey, A., & Szinovacz, M. E. (2008). Introduction: Caregiving in context. In M. E. Szinovacz & A. Davey (Eds.), Caregiving contexts: Cultural, familial, and societal implications (pp. 1–6). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Fisher, B., & Tronto, J. (1990). Towards a feminist theory of care. In E. Abel & M. K. Nelson (Eds.), Circles of care (pp. 35–62). Albany, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  6. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. London, England: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  7. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800.  https://doi.org/10.1086/426800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mollica, R., Simms-Kastelein, K., Cheek, M., Baldwin, C., Farnham, J., Reinhard, S., et al. (2009). AARP Public Policy Institute research report. Building adult foster care: What states can do. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/ppi/ltc/2009_13_building_adult_foster_care.pdf.
  9. National Council on Disability. (2003). OLMSTEAD: Reclaiming institutional lives (abridged version). Washington, DC: National Council on Disability. Retrieved from: http://www.ncd.gov.
  10. National Council on Disability. (2005). Transcending the barriers and gaining entry: A culturally competent realm of community integration for Americans with disabilities. Washington, DC: National Council on Disability. Retrieved from: http://www.ncd.gov/policy/cultural_diversity.
  11. National Council on Disability. (2010). The state of housing in America in the 21st century: A disability perspective. Washington, DC: National Council on Disability. Retrieved from: http://www.ncd/gov/policy/housing.
  12. Noddings, N. (2010). The maternal factor: Two paths to morality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Powell, J. L., & Wahidin, A. (2006). Introduction: Foucault and aging. In J. Powell & A. Wahidin (Eds.), Foucault and aging (pp. vii–xiii). New York, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelly Munly
    • 1
    Email author
  • Karen A. Roberto
    • 2
  • Katherine R. Allen
    • 3
  1. 1.Human Development and Family StudiesPenn State AltoonaAltoonaUSA
  2. 2.The Institute for Society, Culture and Environment, Center for Gerontology, Virginia TechBlacksburgUSA
  3. 3.Department of Human Development and Family ScienceVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations