Victim Participation: An Enhanced Focus on Legal Representation for Victims

  • Kerstin BraunEmail author
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology book series (PSVV)


In all adversarial and non-adversarial jurisdictions analysed in this volume, victims have been afforded some possibilities for participation at certain procedural stages. Yet, the overall picture emerged that victims, on the whole, have not been granted holistic and systematically implemented participation rights at the pre-trial, trial and post-trial stage. The noticeable limitations to victim participation may be due to concerns for the rights of the accused and a fair trial as well as be based on the underlying traditional understanding that victim participation is foreign to state-run and de-privatised criminal conflicts. In light of the generally limited and disjointed participatory role for victims and the continuous and noticeable resistance to its expansion, it is doubtful that an underlying consensus for affording victims structured participation possibilities exists at this point in time. On this basis, Chapter 8 addresses the question of whether there may be greater benefit in focusing on better protecting victim witnesses during proceedings and strengthening the enforcement of existing rights to improve their position rather than in continuing to pursue active participatory rights per se. This proposition is analysed by examining possibilities for introducing or expanding and refining legal representation schemes for victim witnesses. The chapter first sets out the status quo of legal representation schemes in selected jurisdictions before contemplating the merits of their introduction in jurisdictions which currently do not, or only marginally, allow for such arrangements. The analysis also considers problems identified with the practical operation of existing schemes in Germany, Sweden and the US, in an attempt to identify whether these hurdles can likely be overcome in future or whether they pose unsurmountable barriers to their successful operation.


Legal representation for victims Status quo of victim representation schemes across jurisdictions Funding Qualification of victims’ lawyers Enforcement of existing victims’ rights through legal representation 


  1. Amnesty International. (2010, March 8). Case Closed: Rape and Human Rights in the Nordic Countries. London: Amnesty International. Retrieved from
  2. Australian Law Reform Commission. (2010). Family Violence: A National Legal Response—Final Report (ALRC Report 114). Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  3. Bacik, I., Maunsell, C., & Gogan, S. (1998). The Legal Process and Victims of Rape. Dublin: Dublin Rape Crisis Centre.Google Scholar
  4. Barton, S., & Flotho, C. (2010). Ofperanwaelte im Strafverfahren. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braun, K. (2014). Legal Representation for Sexual Assault Victims—Possibilities for Law Reform. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 25, 819–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, B., Burman, M., & Jamieson, L. (1992). Sexual History and Sexual Character Evidence in Scottish Sexual Offence Trials. Edinburgh: Scottish Office Central Research Unit.Google Scholar
  7. Caringella, S. (2009). Addressing Rape Reform in Law and Practice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chalmers, J. (2014). Independent Legal Representation for Complainers in Sexual Offence Cases. In J. Chalmers, F. Leverick, & A. Shaw (Eds.), Post-corroboration Safeguard Review Report of the Academic Expert Group (pp. 185–189). Edinburgh: The Scottish Government.Google Scholar
  9. Daimagueler, M. G. (2016). Der Verletzte im Strafverfahren: Handbuch fuer die Praxis. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  10. Dearing, A. (2017). Justice for Victims of Crime: Human Dignity as the Foundation of Criminal Justice in Europe. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doak, J. (2005). Victims’ Rights in Criminal Trials: Prospects for Participation. Journal of Law and Society, 32(2), 294–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doak, J. (2008). Victims’ Rights, Human Rights and Criminal Justice: Reconceiving the Role of Third Parties. Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Doak, J. (2015, October 20). Victims of Crime in the Criminal Trial Process: Submission 31 to the Victorian Law Reform Commission. Received October 20, 2015. Retrieved from
  14. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (n.d.). A Brief Description of the Federal Criminal Justice Process. Retrieved from
  15. Garvin, M., & Beloof, D. E. (2015). Crime Victim Agency: Independent Lawyers for Sexual Assault Victims. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 13, 67–88.Google Scholar
  16. Groenhuijsen, M. (1999). Victims’ Rights in the Criminal Justice System: A Call for More Comprehensive Implementation Theory. Keynote Lecture Delivered to the Ninth International Symposium on Victimology, August 27, 1997, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Retrieved from
  17. Groenhuijsen, M. (2014). The Development of International Policy in Relation to Victims of Crime. International Review of Victimology, 20(1), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Groenhuijsen, M. S. (2004). Victims’ Rights and Restorative Justice: Piecemeal Reform of the Criminal Justice System or a Change of Paradigm? In H. Kaptein, & M. Malsch (Eds.), Crime, Victims and Justice: Essays on Principles and Practice (pp. 63–79). Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  19. Hoyano, L. (2015). Reforming the Adversarial Trial for Vulnerable Witnesses and Defendants. Criminal Law Review, 2, 107–129.Google Scholar
  20. Kirchengast, T. (2014). Participation of Victims of Crime in New South Wales Court Processes: A Study Commissioned by Victims Services. NSW: Final Report—Full Report Including All Appendices, November 2014. Sydney: Victim Services. Retrieved from
  21. Kirchengast, T. (2016). Victims and the Criminal Trial. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lindgren, M. S., Renck, B., & Diesen, C. (2012). Criminal Justice for Assaulted Women in Sweden—Law Versus Practice. Review of European Studies, 4(1), 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. No Author. (2005, April 27). Victims’ Advocates Plan for Murder and Rape Cases. The Guardian (online). Retrieved from
  24. No Author. (2016, February 12). Anti-rape Groups Hail Legal Aid Ruling. BBC News Scotland. Retrieved from
  25. Office of the Victims of Crime Commissioner (Victoria). (2015, August 21). The Role of Victims in the Criminal Trial Process, Submission 14 to the Victorian Law Reform Commission. Received September 30, 2015. Retrieved from
  26. O’Connell, M. (2014, June 3). Cited in Fewster, S., & Hyde, B. ‘SA Victims’ Rights Commissioner Says Victims Should Be Represented by Lawyers During Criminal Sentencing Hearing. The Advertiser (online). Retrieved from
  27. O’Connell, M. (n.d.). Victims’ Rights: Integrating Victims in Criminal Proceedings, Commission for Victims’ Rights. Adelaide: Government of South Australia. Retrieved from
  28. Pizzi, W., & Perron, W. (1996). Crime Victims in German Courtrooms: A Comparative Perspective on American Problems. Stanford Journal of International Law, 32, 37–64.Google Scholar
  29. Raitt, F. (2010). Independent Legal Representation for Complainers in Sexual Offence Trials, Research Report for Rape Crisis Scotland. Glasgow: Rape Crisis Scotland.Google Scholar
  30. Raitt, F. (2013). Independent Legal Representation in Rape Cases: Meeting the Justice Deficit in Adversarial Proceedings. Criminal Law Review, 9, 729–749.Google Scholar
  31. Rape Crisis Network Ireland. (2012). Previous Sexual History Evidence and Separate Legal Representation: RCNI Position Paper. Dublin: Rape Crisis Network Ireland.Google Scholar
  32. Reeves, H. D., & Dunn, P. (2010). The Status of Crime Victims and Witnesses in the Twenty-First Century. In A. Bottoms & J. Roberts (Eds.), Hearing the Victim, Adversarial Justice, Crime Victims and the State (pp. 46–71). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Smythe, D. (2002). Parliamentary Submissions to the South African Parliament by the University of Cape Town, Sexual Offences Submission. Chapter 8: Legal Representation for Victims of Sexual Offences. Retrieved from
  34. Smythe, D. (2005). Moving Beyond 30 Years of Anglo-American Rape Law Reforms: Legal Representation for Victims of Sexual Violence. South African Journal of Criminal Justice, 2, 167–186.Google Scholar
  35. Staten Offentliga Utredningar. (2007). Committee Report, Målsägandebiträdet-Ett aktivt stöd i rättsprocessen: The Injured Party Counsel: An Active Support in the Legal Process, SOU 2007:6. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Government Official Reports.Google Scholar
  36. Staten Offentliga Utredningar. (2016). Committee Report, Ett starkare skydd för den sexuella integriteten: A Stronger Protection for Sexual Integrity; SOU 2016:60. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Government Official Reports.Google Scholar
  37. Stehle, S. (2007). Das Strafverfahren als immaterielle Wiedergutmachung. Hamburg: Verlag Dr Kovac.Google Scholar
  38. Temkin, J. (2002). Rape and the Legal Process (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tham, H., Roenneling, A., & Rytterbro, L.-L. (2011). The Emergence of the Crime Victim: Sweden in a Scandinavian Context. Crime and Justice, 40(1), 555–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Truscheit, K. (2017, July 5). „Wir brauchen Opferanwälte“. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (online). Retrieved from
  41. United Kingdom Ministry of Justice. (2014). Report on Review of Ways to Reduce Distress of Victims in Trials of Sexual Violence. Retrieved from
  42. Victorian Law Reform Commission. (2016). The Role of Victims of Crime in the Criminal Trial Process—Final Report. Melbourne: Victorian Law Reform Commission.Google Scholar
  43. Weisser, R. (2017). Forschungsprojekt Belastungen von Opfern in Ermittlungsverfahren Forschungsbericht. Mainz: Weisser Ring Stiftung. Retrieved from
  44. Wessing, J., & Ahlbrecht, H. (2013). Der Zeugenbeistand. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  45. Wilson, L. (2008). Victims of Sexual Assault: Who Represents Them in Criminal Proceedings? (Windsor, ON). Unpublished Paper Delivered at the Eleventh Colloquium on the Legal Profession, University of Windsor, October 24, 2008. Retrieved from


  1. Kenna v. US District Court for the Central District of California 435 F.3d 1011 (9th Cir. 2006) (US).Google Scholar
  2. WF, Petitioner [2016] CSOH 27 (Scotland).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia

Personalised recommendations