Advertisement

Nano-metal Oxides for Antibacterial Activity

  • Sankar Jagadeeshan
  • Rajesh ParsanathanEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World book series (ECSW, volume 25)

Abstract

Metal oxide nanoparticles (MeO-NPs) represent a field of material chemistry which attracts considerable interest due to the potential technological applications such as medicine, information technology, catalysis, energy storage and sensing and developing synthetic tailored nanostructures. Many nanomaterials can be used as metal oxides (Ag, Al, Ca, Ce, Cu, Mg, Ti, Yt, Zn). Certain MeO-NPs have strong antimicrobial properties, and its mechanism of actions involved in eliminating bacteria has been studied.

In this chapter we review the methods by which MeO-NPs are synthesized such as sonochemical, electrochemical, co-precipitation, solvothermal, sol-gel, microwave, wet chemical, microemulsion, laser ablation, chemical vapour-based, combustion and template/surface-mediated synthesis methods and biological mycosynthesis, as well as crucial factors (size, shape, roughness, zeta potential, doping modifications and environmental conditions) which affect the antibacterial mechanisms of MeO-NPs. The link between energy-efficient preparation of huge new variety of MeO-NP preparations and its final structural morphology can be exploited for use in a whole range of technologically important areas including efficient antimicrobial properties.

Previous studies have shown that the antimicrobial properties and the mechanism of action of different MeO-NPs that play a wide role as antimicrobial agents such as cell membrane damage by electrostatic interaction, metal/metal ion homeostasis disturbance, reactive oxygen species production, protein enzyme dysfunction, genotoxicity and signal transduction inhibition and photokilling are also reviewed in this chapter. Evidence suggests that in general some nanomaterials can be more toxic than their macro-scale counterparts and therefore caution is warranted on human health. Previous in vitro studies indicated that in comparison with a material’s larger (parent) counterpart, nanomaterials can move easily through cell membranes and can cause severe toxic effects on human health. We will also provide some examples of the features and applications of few known MeO-NPs (TiO2, Ag2O, ZnO, CuO, MgO, CaO, CeO2, Y2O3, Al2O3 and bimetallic oxide nanoparticles). Indeed, the application of MeO-NPs with the minimized toxicity possibly will be extensively used in the near future for eradicating several infectious conditions as alternative of traditional antibiotics to overcome antimicrobial resistance.

Keywords

Antimicrobial Antibacterial activity Doping Metal oxide Nanomaterials Nano-metal oxides Reactive oxygen species Zeta potential 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Mr. William McLean for critical proofreading and excellent editing of this book chapter.

References

  1. Actis L, Srinivasan A, Lopez-Ribot JL, Ramasubramanian AK, Ong JL (2015) Effect of silver nanoparticle geometry on methicillin susceptible and resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and osteoblast viability. J Mater Sci Mater Med 26:215.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5538-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aggarwal P, Hall JB, McLeland CB, Dobrovolskaia MA, McNeil SE (2009) Nanoparticle interaction with plasma proteins as it relates to particle biodistribution, biocompatibility and therapeutic efficacy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61:428–437.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2009.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahamed M, Alsalhi MS, Siddiqui MK (2010) Silver nanoparticle applications and human health. Clin Chim Acta 411:1841–1848.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2010.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al Othman ZA, Alam MM, Naushad M, Inamuddin, Khan MF (2013) Inorganic nanoparticles and nanomaterials based on titanium (Ti): applications in medicine. Mater Sci Forum 754:21–87.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.754.21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arakha M et al (2015) Antimicrobial activity of iron oxide nanoparticle upon modulation of nanoparticle-bacteria interface. Sci Rep 5:14813.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14813 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Assi N, Mohammadi A, Sadr Manuchehri Q, Walker RB (2014) Synthesis and characterization of ZnO nanoparticle synthesized by a microwave-assisted combustion method and catalytic activity for the removal of ortho-nitrophenol. Desalin Water Treat 54:1939–1948.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.891083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Attarchi N, Montazer M, Toliyat T (2013) Ag/TiO2/β-CD nano composite: preparation and photo catalytic properties for methylene blue degradation. Appl Catal A Gen 467:107–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2013.07.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Balakumaran MD, Ramachandran R, Balashanmugam P, Mukeshkumar DJ, Kalaichelvan PT (2016) Mycosynthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles: optimization, characterization and antimicrobial activity against human pathogens. Microbiol Res 182:8–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2015.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Becker S, Soukup JM, Gallagher JE (2002) Differential particulate air pollution induced oxidant stress in human granulocytes, monocytes and alveolar macrophages. Toxicol in Vitro 16:209–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0887-2333(02)00015-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bian S-W, Mudunkotuwa IA, Rupasinghe T, Grassian VH (2011) Aggregation and dissolution of 4 nm ZnO nanoparticles in aqueous environments: influence of pH, ionic strength, size, and adsorption of humic acid. Langmuir 27:6059–6068.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la200570n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caglar M, Ruzgar S (2015) Influence of the deposition temperature on the physical properties of high electron mobility ZnO films by sol–gel process. J Alloys Compd 644:101–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.04.167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calderon IL et al (2009) Tellurite-mediated disabling of [4Fe-4S] clusters of Escherichia coli dehydratases. Microbiology 155:1840–1846.  https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.026260-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cepak VM et al (1997) Chemical strategies for template syntheses of composite micro- and nanostructures. Chem Mater 9:1065–1067.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm970014c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cha S-H, Hong J, McGuffie M, Yeom B, VanEpps JS, Kotov NA (2015) Shape-dependent biomimetic inhibition of enzyme by nanoparticles and their antibacterial activity. ACS Nano 9:9097–9105.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b03247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen H, Wang L (2014) Nanostructure sensitization of transition metal oxides for visible-light photocatalysis. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 5:696–710.  https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.5.82 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen Y, Tian X, Zeng W, Zhu X, Hu H, Duan H (2015) Vapor-phase preparation of gold nanocrystals by chloroauric acid pyrolysis. J Colloid Interface Sci 439:21–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2014.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chichiriccò G, Poma A (2015) Penetration and toxicity of nanomaterials in higher plants. Nanomaterials 5:851–873.  https://doi.org/10.3390/nano5020851 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chung YC, Su YP, Chen CC, Jia G, Wang HL, Wu JC, Lin JG (2004) Relationship between antibacterial activity of chitosan and surface characteristics of cell wall. Acta Pharmacol Sin 25:932–936Google Scholar
  19. Colombo M et al (2012) Biological applications of magnetic nanoparticles. Chem Soc Rev 41:4306–4334.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs15337h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Corr SA, Gun’ko YK, Douvalis AP, Venkatesan M, Gunning RD, Nellist PD (2008) From nanocrystals to nanorods: new iron oxide−silica nanocomposites from metallorganic precursors. J Phys Chem C 112:1008–1018.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp076871d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. D’Souza L, Richards R (2007) Synthesis of metal-oxide nanoparticles: liquid–solid transformations. Synthesis, properties, and applications of oxide nanomaterials. John Wiley & Sons, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  22. Deravi L, Swartz J, Wright D (2010) The biomimetic synthesis of metal oxide nanomaterials vol 2. Nanomaterials for the life sciences vol. 2: nanostructured oxides. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  23. Dolgaev SI, Simakin AV, Voronov VV, Shafeev GA, Bozon-Verduraz F (2002) Nanoparticles produced by laser ablation of solids in liquid environment. Appl Surf Sci 186:546–551.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-4332(01)00634-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. dos Santos C, Passos Farias I, Reis Albuquerque A, e Silva P, Costa One G, Sampaio F (2014) Antimicrobial activity of nano cerium oxide (IV) (CeO2) against Streptococcus mutans. BMC Proc 8(Suppl 4):P48.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-8-s4-p48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. El-Batal A, Haroun B, Farrag A, Baraka A, El-Sayyad G (2014) Synthesis of silver nanoparticles and incorporation with certain antibiotic using gamma irradiation. Br J Pharm Res 4:1341–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Epherre R et al (2011) Manganite perovskite nanoparticles for self-controlled magnetic fluid hyperthermia: about the suitability of an aqueous combustion synthesis route. J Mater Chem 21:4393–4401.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm03963b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fang Q, Shi X, Zhang L, Wang Q, Wang X, Guo Y, Zhou B (2015) Effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on the bioavailability, metabolism, and toxicity of pentachlorophenol in zebrafish larvae. J Hazard Mater 283:897–904.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.10.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Feldmann C, Jungk HO (2001) Polyol-mediated preparation of nanoscale oxide particles we thank Jacqueline Merikhi and Gerd Much for carrying out the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the atomic force microscopy (AFM) investigations, respectively. Angew Chem Int Ed Eng 40:359–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Feng Y, Cho IS, Rao PM, Cai L, Zheng X (2012) Sol-flame synthesis: a general strategy to decorate nanowires with metal oxide/noble metal nanoparticles. Nano Lett 13:855–860.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl300060b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gedanken A (2004) Using sonochemistry for the fabrication of nanomaterials. Ultrason Sonochem 11:47–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2004.01.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Giannousi K, Lafazanis K, Arvanitidis J, Pantazaki A, Dendrinou-Samara C (2014) Hydrothermal synthesis of copper based nanoparticles: antimicrobial screening and interaction with DNA. J Inorg Biochem 133:24–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2013.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gomathi Devi L, Nagaraj B (2014) Disinfection of Escherichia coli Gram negative bacteria using surface modified TiO2: optimization of Ag metallization and depiction of charge transfer mechanism. Photochem Photobiol 90:1089–1098.  https://doi.org/10.1111/php.12308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gopalakrishnan K, Joshi HM, Kumar P, Panchakarla LS, Rao CNR (2011) Selectivity in the photocatalytic properties of the composites of TiO2 nanoparticles with B- and N-doped graphenes. Chem Phys Lett 511:304–308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2011.06.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gopinath K, Karthika V, Sundaravadivelan C, Gowri S, Arumugam A (2015) Mycogenesis of cerium oxide nanoparticles using Aspergillus niger culture filtrate and their applications for antibacterial and larvicidal activities. J Nanostruct Chem 5:295–303.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40097-015-0161-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Griffith M, Udekwu KI, Gkotzis S, Mah T-F, Alarcon EI (2015) Anti-microbiological and anti-infective activities of silver. In: Silver nanoparticle applications. Engineering materials, pp 127–146.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11262-6_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gurunathan S, Han JW, Kwon DN, Kim JH (2014) Enhanced antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities of silver nanoparticles against gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. Nanoscale Res Lett 9:373.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-9-373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Habibi MH, Rezvani Z (2015) Photocatalytic degradation of an azo textile dye (C.I. Reactive Red 195 (3BF)) in aqueous solution over copper cobaltite nanocomposite coated on glass by Doctor Blade method. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 147:173–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2015.03.077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hackenberg S et al (2011) Silver nanoparticles: evaluation of DNA damage, toxicity and functional impairment in human mesenchymal stem cells. Toxicol Lett 201:27–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hahn A, Fuhlrott J, Loos A, Barcikowski S (2012) Cytotoxicity and ion release of alloy nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 14:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-011-0686-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. He L, Liu Y, Mustapha A, Lin M (2011) Antifungal activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles against Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium expansum. Microbiol Res 166:207–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2010.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Huang WC, Tsai PJ, Chen YC (2009) Multifunctional Fe3O4@Au nanoeggs as photothermal agents for selective killing of nosocomial and antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Small 5:51–56.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200801042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hulteen JC, Martin CR (1997) A general template-based method for the preparation of nanomaterials. J Mater Chem 7:1075–1087.  https://doi.org/10.1039/a700027h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ikegami T et al (2015) Two novel motifs of watermelon silver mottle virus NSs protein are responsible for RNA silencing suppression and pathogenicity. PLoS One 10(5):e0126161.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jaiswal M, Dudhe R, Sharma PK (2015) Nanoemulsion: an advanced mode of drug delivery system. 3 Biotech 5:123–127.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-014-0214-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Karimi L, Mirjalili M, Yazdanshenas ME, Nazari A (2010) Effect of nano TiO2 on self-cleaning property of cross-linking cotton fabric with succinic acid under UV irradiation. Photochem Photobiol 86:1030–1037.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.2010.00756.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Khan MF et al (2016) Sol-gel synthesis of thorn-like ZnO nanoparticles endorsing mechanical stirring effect and their antimicrobial activities: potential role as nano-antibiotics. Sci Rep 6:27689.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27689 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kumar A, Saxena A, De A, Shankar R, Mozumdar S (2013a) Facile synthesis of size-tunable copper and copper oxide nanoparticles using reverse microemulsions. RSC Adv 3:5015–5021.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra23455j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kumar H, Manisha, Sangwan P (2013b) Synthesis and characterization of MnO2 nanoparticles using co-precipitation technique. Int J Chem Chem Eng 3:155–160Google Scholar
  49. Lai J, Shafi KL, Ulman A, Lee Y, Vogt T, Estournès C (2003) Doping γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles with Mn(III) suppresses the transition to the α-Fe2O3 structure. J Am Chem Soc 125:11470–11471.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja035409d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lampimäki M et al (2015) Exploring the environmental photochemistry on the TiO2(110) surface in situ by near ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J Phys Chem C 119:7076–7085.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp511340n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lang C, Schuler D, Faivre D (2007) Synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles for bio- and nanotechnology: genetic engineering and biomimetics of bacterial magnetosomes. Macromol Biosci 7:144–151.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200600235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lee H-J, Song JY, Kim BS (2013) Biological synthesis of copper nanoparticles using Magnolia kobus leaf extract and their antibacterial activity. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 88:1971–1977.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Li X, Xu H, Chen Z-S, Chen G (2011) Biosynthesis of nanoparticles by microorganisms and their applications. J Nanomater 2011:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/270974 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Li Y, Zhang W, Niu J, Chen Y (2012) Mechanism of photogenerated reactive oxygen species and correlation with the antibacterial properties of engineered metal-oxide nanoparticles. ACS Nano 6:5164–5173.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn300934k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mallick P (2014) Synthesis of copper oxide nanocomposite (Cu2O/CuO) by sol–gel route. Proc Natl Acad Sci, India Sect A: Phys Sci 84:387–389.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-014-0131-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Martin CR (1996) Membrane-based synthesis of nanomaterials. Chem Mater 8:1739–1746.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm960166s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mascolo MC, Pei Y, Ring TA (2013) Room temperature co-precipitation synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles in a large pH window with different bases. Materials (Basel) 6:5549–5567.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma6125549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mehmood S, Rehman MA, Ismail H, Mirza B, Bhatti AS (2015) Significance of postgrowth processing of ZnO nanostructures on antibacterial activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Int J Nanomedicine 10:4521–4533.  https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S83356 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Montes V et al (2014) Synthesis of different ZnO-supported metal systems through microemulsion technique and application to catalytic transformation of glycerol to acetol and 1,2-propanediol. Catal Today 223:129–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.09.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mousavi FP, Pour HH, Nasab AH, Rajabalipour AA, Barouni M (2015) Investigation into shelf life of fresh dates and pistachios in a package modified with nano-silver glob. J Health Sci 8:134–144.  https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v8n5p134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311:622–627.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1114397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Niazi JH, Gu MB (2009) Toxicity of metallic nanoparticles in microorganisms- a review. In: Atmospheric and biological environmental monitoring, pp 193–206.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9674-7_12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pandey P, Merwyn S, Agarwal GS, Tripathi BK, Pant SC (2012) Electrochemical synthesis of multi-armed CuO nanoparticles and their remarkable bactericidal potential against waterborne bacteria. J Nanopart Res 14:709–721.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-011-0709-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Parham S, Wicaksono DHB, Bagherbaigi S, Lee SL, Nur H (2016) Antimicrobial treatment of different metal oxide nanoparticles: a critical review. J Chin Chem Soc 63:385–393.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jccs.201500446 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Peretyazhko TS, Zhang Q, Colvin VL (2014) Size-controlled dissolution of silver nanoparticles at neutral and acidic pH conditions: kinetics and size changes. Environ Sci Technol 48:11954–11961.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es5023202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Peters RJB, Rivera ZH, van Bemmel G, Marvin HJP, Weigel S, Bouwmeester H (2014) Development and validation of single particle ICP-MS for sizing and quantitative determination of nano-silver in chicken meat. Anal Bioanal Chem 406(16):3875–3885.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7571-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Radovic-Moreno AF, Lu TK, Puscasu VA, Yoon CJ, Langer R, Farokhzad OC (2012) Surface charge-switching polymeric nanoparticles for bacterial cell wall-targeted delivery of antibiotics. ACS Nano 6:4279–4287.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn3008383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Raghunath A, Perumal E (2017) Metal oxide nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents: a promise for the future. Int J Antimicrob Agents 49:137–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Raghupathi KR, Koodali RT, Manna AC (2011) Size-dependent bacterial growth inhibition and mechanism of antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Langmuir 27:4020–4028.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la104825u CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rajiv P, Rajeshwari S, Venckatesh R (2013) Bio-fabrication of zinc oxide nanoparticles using leaf extract of Parthenium hysterophorus L. and its size-dependent antifungal activity against plant fungal pathogens. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 112:384–387.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2013.04.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Raliya R, Tarafdar JC (2014) Biosynthesis and characterization of zinc, magnesium and titanium nanoparticles: an eco-friendly approach. Int Nano Lett 4(1):93.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40089-014-0093-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reyes VC, Opot SO, Mahendra S (2015) Planktonic and biofilm-grown nitrogen-cycling bacteria exhibit different susceptibilities to copper nanoparticles. Environ Toxicol Chem 34:887–897.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2867 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rezaei-Zarchi S, Javed A, Javeed G, Soufian S, Barzegari F, Bayanduri M (2010) Comparative study of antimicrobial activities of TiO2 and CdO nanoparticles against the pathogenic strain of Escherichia coli. Iran J Pathol 5:83–89Google Scholar
  74. Roy A, Bhattacharya J (2011) Microwave-assisted synthesis and characterization of CaO nanoparticles. Int J Nanosci 10:413–418.  https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219581x11008150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sadiq IM, Chowdhury B, Chandrasekaran N, Mukherjee A (2009) Antimicrobial sensitivity of Escherichia coli to alumina nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 5:282–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2009.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sahoo DP, Rath D, Nanda B, Parida KM (2015) Transition metal/metal oxide modified MCM-41 for pollutant degradation and hydrogen energy production: a review. RSC Adv 5:83707–83724.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra14555d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Saliani M, Jalal R, Kafshdare Goharshadi E (2015) Effects of pH and temperature on antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanofluid against Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Staphylococcus aureus. Jundishapur J Microbiol 8:e17115.  https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.17115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sangari M, Umadevi M, Mayandi J, Pinheiro JP (2015) Photocatalytic degradation and antimicrobial applications of F-doped MWCNTs/TiO2 composites. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 139:290–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2014.12.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sathyanarayanan MB, Balachandranath R, Genji Srinivasulu Y, Kannaiyan SK, Subbiahdoss G (2013) The effect of gold and iron-oxide nanoparticles on biofilm-forming pathogens. ISRN Microbiol 2013:272086.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/272086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sawai J (2003) Quantitative evaluation of antibacterial activities of metallic oxide powders (ZnO, MgO and CaO) by conductimetric assay. J Microbiol Methods 54:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Shafi K, Felner I, Mastai Y, Gedanken A (1999) Olympic ring formation from newly prepared barium hexaferrite nanoparticle suspension. J Phys Chem B 103:3358–3360.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp984691l CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shrivastava S, Bera T, Roy A, Singh G, Ramachandrarao P, Dash D (2007) Characterization of enhanced antibacterial effects of novel silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 18(22):225103.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/18/22/225103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stankic S, Sterrer M, Hofmann P, Bernardi J, Diwald O, Knözinger E (2005) Novel optical surface properties of Ca2+-doped MgO nanocrystals. Nano Lett 5:1889–1893.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0511418 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stankic S, Suman S, Haque F, Vidic J (2016) Pure and multi metal oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, antibacterial and cytotoxic properties. J Nanobiotechnol 14:73.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-016-0225-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sui R, Charpentier P (2012) Synthesis of metal oxide nanostructures by direct sol–gel chemistry in supercritical fluids. Chem Rev 112:3057–3082.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr2000465 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sujatha K, Seethalakshmi T, Shanmugasundaram O (2016) Synthesis, characterization of nano tin oxide via co-precipitation method. Nanotechnol Res Pract 11(3):98–105.  https://doi.org/10.13187/nrp.2016.11.98 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sukhorukova IV et al (2015) Toward bioactive yet antibacterial surfaces. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 135:158–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.06.059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Terasako T, Yagi M, Ishizaki M, Senda Y, Matsuura H, Shirakata S (2007) Growth of zinc oxide films and nanowires by atmospheric-pressure chemical vapor deposition using zinc powder and water as source materials. Surf Coat Technol 201:8924–8930.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.04.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Thekkae Padil VV, Cernik M (2013) Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using gum karaya as a biotemplate and their antibacterial application. Int J Nanomedicine 8:889–898.  https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S40599 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tiller JC, Liao CJ, Lewis K, Klibanov AM (2001) Designing surfaces that kill bacteria on contact. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:5981–5985.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.111143098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Vidic J et al (2013) Selective antibacterial effects of mixed ZnMgO nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 15(5):1595.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1595-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wan J, Cai W, Meng X, Liu E (2007) Monodisperse water-soluble magnetite nanoparticles prepared by polyol process for high-performance magnetic resonance imaging. Chem Commun (Camb) 2007:5004–5006.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b712795b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wang D, Lin Z, Wang T, Yao Z, Qin M, Zheng S, Lu W (2016) Where does the toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles come from: the nanoparticles, the ions, or a combination of both? J Hazard Mater 308:328–334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.01.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wang L, Hu C, Shao L (2017) The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: present situation and prospects for the future. Int J Nanomedicine 12:1227–1249.  https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S121956 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wu X, Zheng L, Wu D (2005) Fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces from microstructured ZnO-based surfaces via a wet-chemical route. Langmuir 21:2665–2667.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la050275y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wu W, He Q, Jiang C (2008) Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and surface functionalization strategies. Nanoscale Res Lett 3:397–415.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11671-008-9174-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Yadav S, Uplane M (2012) Synthesis and properties of boron doped ZnO thin films by spray CVD technique at low substrate temperature. Int J Eng Sci Technol 4:4893–4898Google Scholar
  98. Yamamoto O, Ohira T, Alvarez K, Fukuda M (2010) Antibacterial characteristics of CaCO3–MgO composites. Mater Sci Eng B 173:208–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2009.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. You C, Han C, Wang X, Zheng Y, Li Q, Hu X, Sun H (2012) The progress of silver nanoparticles in the antibacterial mechanism, clinical application and cytotoxicity. Mol Biol Rep 39:9193–9201.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-012-1792-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zamiri R, Zakaria A, Ahangar HA, Darroudi M, Zak AK, Drummen GPC (2012) Aqueous starch as a stabilizer in zinc oxide nanoparticle synthesis via laser ablation. J Alloys Compd 516:41–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.11.118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cell Biology DivisionMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Endocrinology, Dr. ALM PG IBMSUniversity of MadrasChennaiIndia
  3. 3.Present Address: Department of PediatricsLouisiana State University Health Science CentreShreveportUSA

Personalised recommendations