Drone-Based Vegetation Assessment in Arid Ecosystems

  • David Gallacher
Part of the Tasks for Vegetation Science book series (TAVS, volume 49)


Proof of long-term vegetation change in arid rangelands is often insufficient to influence policy, even when the change is clear to ecologists. Drones provide a way to collect unbiased evidence of plant spatiotemporal distribution at a dramatically reduced cost for the scales needed in these habitats. Assessment of phytomass spatial distribution by drone has become a routine, but further analysis requires advanced skills in data collection and post-flight processing. Accurate assessment of phytomass temporal change will require protocols to be developed for data collection and analysis. Biodiversity assessment by drone is unreliable, but there is potential for assessing phytomass change within and among taxonomic groups in arid rangelands, by repeatedly sampling areas in which perennial plants have been classified manually.


Arid environments  Unmanned aerial vehicle  Grazing 



I dearly thank my colleagues Tamer Khafaga and Greg Simkins of the Dubai Desert Conservation Reserve for their invaluable support and advice. I also thank Zayed University for financial support.


  1. Abed I, Hellyer P (2001) United Arab Emirates: a new perspective. Trident Press Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson K, Gaston KJ (2013) Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology. Front Ecol Environ 11(3):138–146. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Assaeed AM (1997) Estimation of biomass and utilization of three perennial range grasses in Saudi Arabia. J Arid Environ 36(1):103–111. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batanouny KH (1990) Rangeland ecology of the Arab gulf countries. In: Halwagy R, Taha FK, Omar SA (eds) Proceedings of the 1st international conference on range management in the Arabian Gulf. Kegan Paul International Ltd, London, pp 33–55Google Scholar
  5. Booth DT, Tueller PT (2003) Rangeland monitoring using remote sensing. Arid Land Res Manag 17(4):455–467. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crutsinger GM, Short J, Sollenberger R (2016) The future of UAVs in ecology: an insider perspective from the Silicon Valley drone industry. J Unmanned Veh Syst 4(3):161–168. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donahue, DL (1999). The Western Range Revisited: Removing Livestock from Public Lands to Conserve Native Biodiversity. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Féret J-B, Asner GP (2012) Semi-supervised methods to identify individual crowns of lowland tropical canopy species using imaging spectroscopy and LiDAR. Remote Sens 4(8):2457–2476. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferguson M, McCann I, Manners G. (1998) Less water, more grazing. ICARDA Caravan (ICARDA).
  10. Gallacher DJ (2016) Drones to manage the urban environment. Risks, rewards, alternatives. J Unmanned Veh Sys. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallacher DJ, Hill JP (2006) Effects of camel grazing on the ecology of small perennial plants in the Dubai (UAE) Inland Desert. J Arid Environ 66(4):738–750. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallacher DJ, Khafaga T, Mahmoud Ahmed T, Shabana HA (2016) Plant species identification via drone images in an arid shrubland. In Iwaasa A, Schellenberg M, Willms W, Larson K. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 10th International Rangeland Congress, pp 981–982. Saskatoon, Canada: Society for Range Management.
  13. Holechek JL, Pieper RD, Herbel CH (2010) Range management: principles and practices, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, BostonGoogle Scholar
  14. Hung C, Bryson M, Sukkarieh S (2012) Multi-class predictive template for tree crown detection. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 68:170–183. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laliberte A (2012, Spring) Mapping rangelands with unmanned aircraft. Professional Surveyor. Retrieved from
  16. Mitchell JE (2010) Criteria and indicators of sustainable rangeland management. University of Wyoming, Cooperative Extension Service. Retrieved from
  17. Ustin SL, Santos MJ (2010) Spectral identification of native and non-native plant species. In Proceedings of ASD and IEEE GRS; art, science and applications of reflectance spectroscopy symposium, Vol. II (p. 17). Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  18. Walton KM, Spalinger DE, Harris NR, Collins WB, Willacker JJ (2013) High spatial resolution vegetation mapping for assessment of wildlife habitat. Wildl Soc Bull 37(4):906–915. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Gallacher
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Interdisciplinary StudiesZayed UniversityDubaiUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations