Advertisement

On Selfie Diplomacy

  • Ilan ManorEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy book series (GPD)

Abstract

This chapter examines how the logic of the digital society has impacted the practice of nation branding through the concept of selfie diplomacy. Conceptually, selfie diplomacy is situated at the intersection of nation branding and public diplomacy. Thus, this chapter begins by defining the term “nation branding” and analyzing the conceptual relationship between nation branding and public diplomacy. Next, the chapter demonstrates how nation branding activities on digital platforms differ from those conducted via mass media. Specifically, the chapter argues that on social media the nation state is individualized as it acquires the traits of a digital self, including a profile page, profile picture and likes and dislikes. To conclude, the chapter reviews the selfie of America in the age of Donald Trump and Poland’s historic selfie.

References

  1. Adesina, O. S. (2017). Foreign policy in an era of digital diplomacy. Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), 1297175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anholt, S., & Hildreth, J. (2005). Let freedom and cash registers ring: America as a brand. Place Branding, 1(2), 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronczyk, M. (2008). ‘Living the brand’: Nationality, globality, and the identity strategies of nation branding consultants. International Journal of Communication, 2, 25.Google Scholar
  4. Aronczyk, M. (2013). Branding the nation: The global business of national identity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bauman, Z., & Lyon, D. (2016). Remoteness, distancing and automation. In Z. Bauman & D. Lyon (Eds.), Liquid surveillance (pp. 76–99). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. BBC. (2007). Poll: World view of United States role goes from bad to worse. BBC World Service. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2007/01_january/23/us.shtml.
  7. Bjola, C., & Manor, I. (2018). Revisiting Putnam’s two-level game theory in the digital age: Domestic digital diplomacy and the Iran nuclear deal. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 31, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Causey, C., & Howard, P. N. (2013). Delivering digital public diplomacy. In R. S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault, & A. Fisher (Eds.), Relational, networked and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy (pp. 144–156). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  9. Copeland, D. (2013). Taking diplomacy public: Science, technology and foreign ministries in a heteropolar world. In R. S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault, & A. Fisher (Eds.), Relational, networked and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy (pp. 56–69). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  10. Cull, N. J. (2008). Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duncombe, C. (2017). Twitter and transformative diplomacy: Social media and Iran–US relations. International Affairs, 93(3), 545–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fan, Y. (2010). Branding the nation: Towards a better understanding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 6(2), 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fullerton, J. A., Kendrick, A., Chan, K., Hamilton, M., & Kerr, G. (2007). Attitudes towards American brands and brand America. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 3(3), 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goffman, E. (1990). The presentation of self in everyday life. London, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  15. Grossman, S. (2015, November). Finland is launching a special set of national emoji. Time. Retrieved from http://time.com/4100041/finland-national-emoji/.
  16. Gudjonsson, H. (2005). Nation branding. Place Branding, 1(3), 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. John, T. (2018, February). Poland just passed a Holocaust bill that is causing outrage. Here’s what you need to know. Time. Retrieved from http://time.com/5128341/poland-holocaust-law/.
  18. Kaneva, N. (2011). Nation branding: Toward an agenda for critical research. International Journal of Communication, 5, 25.Google Scholar
  19. Kotler, P., & Gertner, D. (2002). Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 9(4), 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lodge, C. (2002). Success and failure: The brand stories of two countries. Journal of Brand Management, 9(4), 372–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Manor, I. (2016). Are we there yet: Have MFA s realized the potential of digital diplomacy? Brill Research Perspectives in Diplomacy and Foreign Policy, 1(2), 1–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manor, I. (2017). America’s selfie—Three years later. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 13(4), 308–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manor, I., & Segev, E. (2015). America’s selfie: How the US portrays itself on its social media accounts. In C. Bjola & M. Holmes (Eds.), Digital diplomacy theory and practice (pp. 89–108). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Manor, I., & Soone, L. (2018, January). The digital industries: Transparency as mass deception. Global Policy. Retrieved from https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/articles/science-and-technology/digital-industries-transparency-mass-deception.
  25. Mor, B. D. (2012). Credibility talk in public diplomacy. Review of International Studies, 38(2), 393–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Natarajan, K. (2014). Digital public diplomacy and a strategic narrative for India. Strategic Analysis, 38(1), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Papadopoulos, N., & Heslop, L. (2002). Country equity and country branding: Problems and prospects. Journal of Brand Management, 9(4), 294–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Quelch, J. A., & Jocz, K. E. (2009). Can brand Obama rescue brand America? The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 16(1), 163–178.Google Scholar
  29. Skuba, C. (2002). Branding America. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 3, 105–114.Google Scholar
  30. Spry, D. (2018). Facebook diplomacy: A data-driven, user-focused approach to Facebook use by diplomatic missions. Media International Australia, 168(1), 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Storr, W. (2018). Selfie: How the West became self-obsessed. London: Picador.Google Scholar
  32. Szondi, G. (2008). Public diplomacy and nation branding: Conceptual similarities and differences. Clingendael: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.Google Scholar
  33. Transcript of President Bush’s Address. (2001, September 21). CNN. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/09/20/gen.bush.transcript/.
  34. Van Ham, P. (2008). Place branding: The state of the art. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 126–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van Ham, P. (2013). Social power in public diplomacy. In R. S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault, & A. Fisher (Eds.), Relational, networked and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy (pp. 17–28). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International DevelopmentUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations