Advertisement

A Simplified Active Calibration Algorithm for Focal Length Estimation

  • Mehdi Faraji
  • Anup Basu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11010)

Abstract

We introduce new linear mathematical formulations to calculate the focal length of a camera in an active platform. Through mathematical derivations, we show that the focal lengths in each direction can be estimated using only one point correspondence that relates images taken before and after a degenerate rotation of the camera. The new formulations will be beneficial in robotic and dynamic surveillance environments when the camera needs to be calibrated while it freely moves and zooms. By establishing a correspondence between only two images taken after slightly panning and tilting the camera and a reference image, our proposed Simplified Calibration Method is able to calculate the focal length of the camera. We extensively evaluate the derived formulations on a simulated camera, 3D scenes and real-world images. Our error analysis over simulated and real images indicates that the proposed Simplified Active Calibration formulation estimates the parameters of a camera with low error rates.

Keywords

Active Calibration Self calibration Simplified Active Calibration SAC Pan tilt zoom camera PTZ 

References

  1. 1.
    Maybank, S.J., Faugeras, O.D.: A theory of self-calibration of a moving camera. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 8(2), 123–151 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Faugeras, O.D., Luong, Q.-T., Maybank, S.J.: Camera self-calibration: theory and experiments. In: Sandini, G. (ed.) ECCV 1992. LNCS, vol. 588, pp. 321–334. Springer, Heidelberg (1992).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55426-2_37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basu, A.: Active calibration. In: Proceedings of 1993 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 764–769. IEEE (1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Basu, A.: Active calibration: alternative strategy and analysis. In: Proceedings of 1993 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 1993, pp. 495–500. IEEE (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Basu, A.: Active calibration of cameras: theory and implementation. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 25(2), 256–265 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Basu, A., Ravi, K.: Active camera calibration using pan, tilt and roll. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B (Cybern.) 27(3), 559–566 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Junejo, I.N., Foroosh, H.: Optimizing PTZ camera calibration from two images. Mach. Vis. Appl. 23(2), 375–389 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang, Z.: Flexible camera calibration by viewing a plane from unknown orientations. In: The Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 1, pp. 666–673. IEEE (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Faraji, M., Shanbehzadeh, J., Nasrollahi, K., Moeslund, T.B.: Erel: extremal regions of extremum levels. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 681–685. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Faraji, M., Shanbehzadeh, J., Nasrollahi, K., Moeslund, T.: Extremal regions detection guided by maxima of gradient magnitude. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 24, 5401–5415 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computing ScienceUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations