Reducing Sulfur Emissions: Logistical and Environmental Considerations
In recent years the issue of sulfur emissions from maritime transport has seen newfound attention. This chapter presents an overview of the main issues of sulfur emissions and the legislative framework that seeks to reduce the sulfur footprint of the maritime sector. It also analyzes potential modal shifts toward less efficient land-based modes which may happen as a result of sulfur regulations and investigates the related potential economic damage to ship operators. To that effect, this chapter presents findings from a recently finished project at DTU and the developed methodological framework that can be used to estimate such modal shifts, as well as to measure the efficacy of policy and ship operators’ measures to reverse such shifts.
Bunker adjustment factor
Energy Efficiency Design Index
Emission trading system
Heavy fuel oil
International Maritime Organization
Liquefied natural gas
Marine diesel oil
Marine gas oil
Ro-Ro with passengers
Sulfur Emission Control Area
Short sea shipping
World Health Organization
Much of the work presented in this chapter is in the context of the project: “Mitigating and reversing the side-effects of environmental legislation on Ro-Ro shipping in Northern Europe” (also known as the RoRoSECA project) funded by the Danish Maritime Fund and the Orients Fund. We are grateful to Poul Woodall of DFDS whom we worked with in this project, for the provision of data and valuable input and discussions in producing this work.
- Buhaug, Ø., Corbett, J., Endresen, O., Eyring, V., Faber, J., Hanayama, S., Lee, D., Lindstad, H., Mjelde, A., Palsson, C., Wanquing, W., Winebrake, J., & Yoshida, K. (2009). Second IMO greenhouse gas study. London: International Maritime Organization.Google Scholar
- COWI/DTUCOWI/DTU. (2016). Transport economic unit prices for use in socio-economic analyses – version 1.6 (in Danish). Accessed 14 Feb 2017.Google Scholar
- Danesi, A., & Longhi, M. (2016). Opening the southern door of the Italian inland waterway transport network. Transport Logistics, 16(41).Google Scholar
- DMA. (2012). A feasibility study for an LNG filling station infrastructure and test of recommendations. North European LNG Infrastructure Project. Available at: https://www.dma.dk/Vaekst/EU/Documents/LNG_Full_report_20120524_optimerad.pdf. Accessed May 2017.
- EMSA. (2010). European maritime safety. The 0.1% sulphur in fuel requirement as from 1 January 2015 in SECAs-An assessment of available impact studies and alternative means of compliance.Google Scholar
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2013). Clean air markets: Allowance trading. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/trading/. Accessed Sep 2018.
- European Commission. (2008). Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
- Eyring, V., Köhler, H. W., van Aardenne, J., & Lauer, A. (2005). Emissions from international shipping: 1. The last 50 years. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 110(D17), 1–12.Google Scholar
- Henriksson, T. (2007). SOx scrubbing of marine exhaust gases. Wärtsilä Technical Journal, 2007(2), 55–58.Google Scholar
- IMO. (2014). Third IMO GHG study 2014. London: International Maritime Organization (IMO) Available at: http://www.iadc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/MEPC-67-6-INF3-2014-Final-Report-complete.pdf. Accessed Jun 2015.Google Scholar
- Lemper, B., Hader, A., Hübscher, A., Maatsch, S., & Tasto, M. (2009). Reducing the sulphur conten of shipping fuels further to 0.1% in the North Sea and Baltic Sea in 2015: Consequences for shipping in this shipping area. Final report. Bremen: Institut für Seeverkehrswirtschaft und Logistik.Google Scholar
- MAN Diesel and Turbo. (2014). Guidelines for operation on fuels with less than 0.1% Sulphur. Copenhagen, Denmark. http://marine.man.eu/docs/librariesprovider6/test/guidelines-for-operationon-fuels-with-less-than-0-1-sulphur.pdf?sfvrsn=5. Accessed Dec 2017.
- Odgaard, T., Frank, C., Henriques, M., Bøge, M. (2013). The impact on short sea shipping and the risk of modal shift from the establishment of a NOx emission control area in the North Sea. Available at: http://eng.mst.dk/media/mst/9149808/theimpactonshortseashippingandtheriskofmodalshiftfromtheestablishmentofanecafina. Accessed Apr 2016.
- OECD. (2017). Air and GHG emissions (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/93d10cf7-en
- Pickering, K. T., & Owen, L. A. (1997). An introduction to global environmental issues (Vol. 2). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Ricardo-AEA. (2014). Update of the handbook on external costs of transport. Report for the European Commission DG MOVE, London.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization (WHO). (2005). Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulphur dioxide. Available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2006/WHO_SDE_PHE_OEH_06.02_eng.pdf. Accessed Feb 2018.
- Zis, T. (2015). The Implications and trade-offs of near-port ship emissions reduction policies.Google Scholar
- Zis, T., & Psaraftis, H. N. (2018a). Operational measures to mitigate and reverse the potential modal shifts due to environmental legislation. Maritime Policy & Management, 1–16.Google Scholar
- Zis, T., Panagakos, G., Kronbak, J., Psaraftis, H. N. (2017). Report on the outcome of Task 3.2 “Measures from policy makers”. Available at: http://www.roroseca.transport.dtu.dk/dissemination