Advertisement

Crowdfunding for Increased Awareness Crowd-Sensing: A Technical Account

  • S. De VitoEmail author
  • Girolamo Di Francia
  • E. Esposito
  • G. Fattoruso
  • S. Fiore
  • F. Formisano
  • Ettore Massera
  • M. Salvato
  • A. Buonanno
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 539)

Abstract

This work presents the results of the crowdfunding campaign devised for MONICA, an air quality monitoring portable device. The initiative is strongly focused on the increased awareness and involvement of citizens in the air pollution issue solution. Specifically, MONICA is an architecture composed by a portable device based on an array of commercial electrochemical sensors calibrated in lab, an Android App for smartphone, a web portal (MENA) and a NOSQL backend. This infrastructure is able to manage data communication/storage and map visualization of personal exposure to air pollutants. Two associated calibration procedures are depicted, one based on in-lab recordings while the second, based on the emerging on field calibration paradigm, will refine the performance of the node. The successful, both in financial and participatory terms, campaign has reached a crowdfunded contribution of 8000 € (145% of expected 6000 €) by 102 supporters. Among them, 44 users, have opted to become part of a small fleet of human-sensors able to produce air quality data during their daily mobility routine.

Keywords

Air quality Microsensors device Crowdfunding 

References

  1. 1.
    Kampa, M., Castanas, E.: Human health effects of air pollution. Environ. Pollut. 151, 362–367 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Seaton, A., Godden, D., MacNee, W., Donaldson, K.: Particulate air pollution and acute health effects. The Lancet 345(8943), 176–178 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pope, C.A., Dockery, D.W.: Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 56, 709–742 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baklanov, A., et al.: Atmos. Environ. 126, 235–249 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008L0050
  8. 8.
    Air Quality Guidelines Global Update (2005). www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/78638/E90038.pdf
  9. 9.
    Mead, I., et al.: Atmos. Environ. 70, 186–203 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lewis, A., Edwards, P.: Nature 535, 29–31.  https://doi.org/10.1038/535029aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Alphasense company website. www.alphasense.com. Accessed Apr 2018
  14. 14.
    Esposito, E., et al.: Dynamic neural network architectures for on field stochastic calibration of indicative low cost air quality sensing systems. Sens. Act. B Chem. 231, 701–713 (2016). ISSN 0925-4005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marco, S.: The need for external validation in machine olfaction: emphasis on health-related applications. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 406, 3941 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. De Vito
    • 1
    Email author
  • Girolamo Di Francia
    • 1
  • E. Esposito
    • 1
  • G. Fattoruso
    • 1
  • S. Fiore
    • 2
  • F. Formisano
    • 1
  • Ettore Massera
    • 1
  • M. Salvato
    • 1
  • A. Buonanno
    • 1
  1. 1.DTE-FSN-DINPortici (NA)Italy
  2. 2.FSN-TECFISENEA, C.R. PorticiPortici (NA)Italy

Personalised recommendations