Advertisement

Ontopolitics at Play: Inclusion Between a Panacea and a Hook

  • Jan PospisilEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies book series (RCS)

Abstract

The state of affirmation in peacebuilding has developed its own ontopolitical concepts: inclusion, resilience, political settlements. These concepts combine contextualised on-the-ground realities, residuals of liberal peacebuilding and ambiguous aspirations. In order to work in public policy, they still need to be evidenced. Measurement frameworks for inclusive peace and resilient political settlements are developed. The current policy truism that inclusion in peace processes leads to a more sustainable peacebuilding outcome, however, cannot be upheld when examining the available research outcomes. Inclusion as such is a contradictory concept that inevitably leads to fundamental trade-offs. Trade-offs do not render the endeavour worthless. However, inclusion needs to be reconceptualised as a small-scale practice, as a process tool best implemented in the form of hooks which can be inscribed in peace agreements and utilised pragmatically in post-war transitions.

Keywords

Inclusion Sustaining peace Inclusive peace Providing hooks Human rights Peace processes 

References

  1. Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. London: Profile.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, Christine. 2017. Navigating Inclusion in Peace Settlements: Human Rights and the Creation of the Common Good. London: The British Academy.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, Christine. 2018. Political Power-Sharing and Inclusion: Peace and Transition Processes. PA-X Report: Power-Sharing Series. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Political Settlements Research Programme.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, Christine, and Catherine O’Rourke. 2010. Peace Agreements or Pieces of Paper? The Impact of UNSC Resolution 1325 on Peace Processes and Their Agreements. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 59 (4): 941–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, Christine, and Jan Pospisil. 2017. Navigating Inclusion in Transitions from Conflict: The Formalised Political Unsettlement. Journal of International Development 29 (5): 576–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, Christine, and Kimana Zulueta-Fülscher. 2016. Sequencing Peace Agreements and Constitutions in the Political Settlements Process. Edinburgh and Stockholm: International IDEA.Google Scholar
  7. Belloni, Roberto. 2008a. State Building and International Intervention in Bosnia. London and New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belloni, Roberto. 2008b. Civil Society in War-to-Democracy Transitions. In From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding, ed. Anna K. Jarstad and Timothy D. Sisk, 182–210. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boswell, Alan. 2013. Latest Challenge for South Sudan: Armed Internal Rebellion, 26 March 2011, updated 18 September 2013. McClatchy, https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/world/article24618415.html. Accessed 24 September 2018.
  10. Call, Charles T. 2012. Why Peace Fails: The Causes and Prevention of Civil War Recurrence. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chandler, David. 2018. Planetary Boundaries and the Challenge to Governance in the Anthropocene. Repats: Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas Avancadas do Terceiro Setor, Special Issue 1: 21–41. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chuma, Aeneas, and Ozonnia Ojielo. 2012. Building a Standing National Capacity for Conflict Prevention and Resolution in Kenya. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7 (3): 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohn, Carol, Helen Kinsella, and Sheri Gibbings. 2004. Women, Peace and Security Resolution 1325. International Feminist Journal of Politics 6 (1): 130–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Commission on Growth and Development. 2008. The Growth Report: Strategies for Sustained Growth and Inclusive Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  15. Darby, John, and Roger Mac Ginty. 2003. Conclusion: Peace Processes, Present, and Future. In Contemporary Peacemaking: Conflict, Peace Processes and Post-War Reconstruction, ed. John Darby and Roger Mac Ginty, 352–373. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. de Waal, Alex. 2017. Inclusion in Peacemaking: From Moral Claim to Political Fact. In The Fabric of Peace in Africa: Looking Beyond the State, ed. Pamela Aall and Chester A. Crocker, 165–186. Waterloo, ON: Centre for International Governance Innovation.Google Scholar
  17. Di John, Jonathan, and James Putzel. 2009. Political Settlements. GSDRC Issues Paper, Governance and Social Development Resource Centre, Birmingham.Google Scholar
  18. Evans, William. 2012. A Review of the Evidence Informing DFID’s “Building Peaceful States and Societies” Practice Paper. Paper 1: Political Settlements, Peace Settlements, and Inclusion. Research and Evidence Division Evidence Products. London: DFID.Google Scholar
  19. Fetherston, A.B. 1994. Towards a Theory of United Nations Peacekeeping. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goonatilake, Susantha. 2006. Recolonisation: Foreign Funded NGOs in Sri Lanka. Los Angeles, CA and London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Grimm, Sonja, and Julia Leininger. 2012. Not All Good Things Go Together: Conflicting Objectives in Democracy Promotion. Democratization 19 (3): 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gupta, Joyeeta, Nicky R.M. Pouw, and Mirjam A.F. Ros-Tonen. 2015. Towards an Elaborated Theory of Inclusive Development. European Journal of Development Research 27 (4): 541–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hayden, Robert M. 2005. “Democracy” Without a Demos? The Bosnian Constitutional Experiment and the Intentional Construction of Nonfunctioning States. East European Politics and Societies 19 (2): 226–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Herbolzheimer, Kristian. 2016. Innovations in the Colombian Peace Process. NOREF Report, June 2016. Oslo: Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre.Google Scholar
  25. Horowitz, Donald L. 2006. Constitutional Courts: A Primer for Decision Makers. Journal of Democracy 17 (4): 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keane, John. 1998. Civil Society: Old Images, New Visions. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Krook, Mona Lena, and Jacqui True. 2010. Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms: The United Nations and the Global Promotion of Gender Equality. European Journal of International Relations 18 (1): 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumar, Chetan, and Jos De la Haye. 2012. Hybrid Peacemaking: Building National “Infrastructures for Peace”. Global Governance 18 (1): 13–20.Google Scholar
  29. Lederach, John Paul. 1997. Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace.Google Scholar
  30. Lederach, John Paul. 2012. The Origins and Evolution of Infrastructures for Peace: A Personal Reflection. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7 (3): 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lindemann, Stefan. 2008. Do Inclusive Elite Bargains Matter? A Research Framework for Understanding the Causes of Civil War in Sub-Sahara Africa. Crisis States Discussion Paper 15, LSE, London.Google Scholar
  32. Lindemann, Stefan. 2011. Inclusive Elite Bargains and the Dilemma of Unproductive Peace: A Zambian Case Study. Third World Quarterly 32 (10): 1843–1869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mac Ginty, Roger. 2008. No War, No Peace: The Rejuvenation of Stalled Peace Processes and Peace Accords. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Newman, Edward, and Oliver P. Richmond. 2006. Peace Building and Spoilers. Conflict, Security & Development 6 (1): 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nilsson, Desiree. 2012. Anchoring the Peace: Civil Society Actors in Peace Accords and Durable Peace. International Interactions: Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations 38 (2): 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. North, Douglass C., John Joseph Wallis, and Barry R. Weingast. 2009. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. OCED DAC. 2010. The State’s Legitimacy in Fragile Situations: Unpacking Complexity. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  38. O’Reilly, Marie, Andrea Ó Súilleabháin, and Thania Paffenholz. 2015. Reimagining Peacemaking: Women’s Roles in Peace Processes. New York, NY: International Peace Institute.Google Scholar
  39. Orjuela, Camilla. 2004. Civil Society in Civil War: Peace Work and Identity Politics in Sri Lanka. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, Department of Peace and Development Research.Google Scholar
  40. Paffenholz, Thania. 2014. Civil Society and Peace Negotiations: Beyond the Inclusion-Exclusion Dichotomy. Negotiation Journal 30 (1): 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Paffenholz, Thania, and Nicholas Ross. 2015. Inclusive Peace Processes—An Introduction. Development Dialogue 63 (Part 1): 28–37.Google Scholar
  42. Paffenholz, Thania, Nicholas Ross, Steven Dixon, Anna-Lena Schluchter, and Jacqui True. 2016. Making Women Count—Not Just Counting Women: Assessing Women’s Inclusion and Influence on Peace Negotiations. Geneva: Inclusive Peace and Transition Initiative, UN Women.Google Scholar
  43. Paffenholz, Thania, Andreas Hirblinger, Dana Landau, Felix Fritsch, and Constance Dijkstra. 2017. Preventing Violence through Inclusion: From Building Political Momentum to Sustaining Peace. Geneva: Inclusive Peace and Transition Initiative.Google Scholar
  44. Perera, Suda. 2017. Burning the Tent Down: Violent Political Settlements in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Journal of International Development 29 (5): 628–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pinaud, Clemence. 2014. South Sudan: Civil War, Predation and the Making of a Military Aristocracy. African Affairs 113 (451): 192–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pires, Emilia. 2007. Building Peaceful States Against All Odds: The g7+ Leads the Way. USAID Frontiers in Development. Washington, DC: USAID.Google Scholar
  47. Posner, Daniel N., and Daniel J. Young. 2018. Term Limits: Leadership, Political Competition and the Transfer of Power. In Institutions and Democracy in Africa: How the Rules of the Game Shape Political Developments, ed. Nic Cheeseman, 260–278. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Richmond, Oliver P. 2013. Peace Formation and Local Infrastructures for Peace. Alternatives: Global Local, Political 38 (4): 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rocha Menocal, Alina. 2015. Inclusive Political Settlements: Evidence, Gaps, and Challenges of Institutional Transformation. DLP Working Paper, University of Birmingham, DLP, Birmingham.Google Scholar
  50. Salter, Mark. 2015. To End a Civil War: Norway’s Peace Engagement in Sri Lanka. London: C. Hurst & Co.Google Scholar
  51. Sanderson, Ian. 2002. Evaluation, Policy Learning and Evidence-Based Policy Making. Public Administration 80 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schumpeter, Joseph A. 2008. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 3rd ed. New York, NY and London: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  53. Shepherd, Laura J. 2008. Power and Authority in the Production of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325. International Studies Quarterly 52 (2): 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Spears, Ian S. 2000. Understanding Inclusive Peace Agreements in Africa: The Problems of Sharing Power. Third World Quarterly 21 (1): 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stedman, Stephen John. 1997. Spoiler Problems in Peace Processes. International Security 22 (2): 5–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Swan, Bernard. 1995. An Inclusive Paradigm of Peace: The Kingdom of God. Pacifica Review: Peace, Security & Global Change 7 (1): 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. United Nations. 2010. United Nations Approach to Transitional Justice. Guidance Note of the Secretary-General. New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
  58. UN General Assembly, Security Council. 2015. Report of the High-Level Independent Panel on Peace Operations on Uniting Our Strengths for Peace: Politics, Partnership and People. A/70/95-S/2015/446. New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
  59. UN General Assembly, Security Council. 2018. Peacebuilding and Sustaining Peace. Report of the Secretary-General. A/72/707-S/2018/43. New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
  60. UN Security Council. 2000. Resolution 1325 (2000), adopted by the Security Council at its 4213th meeting, on 31 October 2000. S/RES/1325 (2000). New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
  61. UN Security Council. 2016. Resolution 2282 (2016), adopted by the Security Council at its 7680th meeting, on 27 April 2016. S/RES/2282 (2016). New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
  62. Verweijen, Judith. 2016. Stable Instability: Political Settlements and Armed Groups in the Congo. London: RVI Usalama Project, Political Settlements Research Programme.Google Scholar
  63. Visoka, Gëzim, and John Doyle. 2016. Neo-functional Peace: The European Union Way of Resolving Conflicts. Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (4): 862–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wanis-St. John, Anthony, and Darren Kew. 2008. Civil Society and Peace Negotiations: Confronting Exclusion. International Negotiation 13 (1): 11–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Whaites, Alan. 2008. States in Development: Understanding State-Building. A DFID Working Paper, DFID, Governance and Social Development Group, Policy and Research Division, London.Google Scholar
  66. Wise, Laura. 2018a. Territorial Power-Sharing and Inclusion in Peace Processes. PA-X Report: Power Sharing Series. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Political Settlements Research Programme.Google Scholar
  67. Wise, Laura. 2018b. Setting Aside the “Others”: Exclusion amid Inclusion of Non-dominant Minorities in Peace Agreements. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 24 (3): 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. World Bank and United Nations. 2018. Pathways for Peace: Inclusive Approaches to Preventing Violent Conflict. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ASPR—Austrian Study Centre for Peace and Conflict ResolutionViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations