Advertisement

Conceptualising Formalised Political Unsettlement

  • Jan PospisilEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies book series (RCS)

Abstract

One of the reasons behind peacebuilding’s state of affirmation is the failure to deliver on its goal of supporting the negotiation and implementation of an inclusive political settlement. Instead, the most likely outcome of peace processes is a situation of formalised political unsettlement, which is produced by the institutionalisation of radical political disagreement. Despite often being able to tame violence, formalised political unsettlement is a difficult, tough-to-love constellation that enshrines the contestation about a polity. Yet, formalised political unsettlement can also be seen as an opportunity for pragmatic transitions. Its institutional fluidity, its unsettled character and the inability of the conflict parties to win their default positions offers opportunities for engaging in transitional processes.

Keywords

Political settlements Formalised political unsettlement Resilience Inclusion War-to-peace transitions Peace processes 

References

  1. Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. London: Profile.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, Michael, and Christoph Zürcher. 2009. The Peacebuilder’s Contract: How External Statebuilding Reinforces Weak Statehood. In The Dilemmas of Statebuilding: Confronting the Contradictions of Postwar Peace Operations, ed. Roland Paris and Timothy D. Sisk, 23–52. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Behuria, Pritish, Lars Buur, and Hazel Gray. 2017. Studying Political Settlements in Africa. African Affairs 116 (464): 508–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, Christine, and Jan Pospisil. 2017. Navigating Inclusion in Transitions from Conflict: The Formalised Political Unsettlement. Journal of International Development 29 (5): 576–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boege, Volker, M. Anne Brown, and Kevin P. Clements. 2009. Hybrid Political Orders, Not Fragile States. Peace Review 21 (1): 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, David. 1998. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chadwick, Wren, Tobias Debiel, Frank Gadinger (eds). 2013. Relational Sensibility and the ‘Turn to the Local’: Prospects for the Future of Peacebuilding. Global Dialogues 2. Duisburg: Centre for Global Cooperation Research.Google Scholar
  8. de Waal, Alex. 2015. The Real Politics of the Horn of Africa: Money, War and the Business of Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. de Waal, Alex. 2017. Inclusion in Peacemaking: From Moral Claim to Political Fact. In The Fabric of Peace in Africa: Looking Beyond the State, ed. Pamela Aall and Chester A. Crocker, 165–186. Waterloo, ON: Centre for International Governance Innovation.Google Scholar
  10. Di John, Jonathan, and James Putzel. 2009. Political Settlements. GSDRC Issues Paper, Governance and Social Development Resource Centre, Birmingham.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, Michel. 2003. Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the College de France, 1975–1976. New York, NY: Picador.Google Scholar
  12. Fukuyama, Francis. 2012. The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  13. g7+ group. 2013. Note on the Fragility Spectrum. Launched in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.Google Scholar
  14. Hagmann, Tobias, and Didier Péclard. 2010. Negotiating Statehood: Dynamics of Power and Domination in Africa. Development and Change 41 (4): 539–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoffmann, Kasper, and Tom Kirk. 2013. Public Authority and the Provision of Public Goods in Conflict-Affected and Transitioning Regions. JSRP Paper 7, LSE, International Development Department, London.Google Scholar
  16. Jahn, Beate. 2007a. The Tragedy of Liberal Diplomacy: Democratization, Intervention, Statebuilding (Part I). Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 1 (1): 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jahn, Beate. 2007b. The Tragedy of Liberal Diplomacy: Democratization, Intervention, Statebuilding (Part II). Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 1 (2): 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jamar, Astrid. 2017. The Social Life of Policy Reports: Reporting as a Tool in the Transitional Justice Battlefield in Rwanda. Revue Internationale Des Études Du Développement 232 (4): 165–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khan, Musthaq H. 2010. Political Settlements and the Governance of Growth-Enhancing Institutions. Unpublished Draft Paper, Version July 2010.Google Scholar
  20. Lemay-Hébert, Nicolas. 2013. Critical Debates on Liberal Peacebuilding. Civil Wars 15 (2): 242–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levy, Brian. 2014. Working with the Grain: Integrating Governance and Growth in Development Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lindemann, Stefan. 2008. Do Inclusive Elite Bargains Matter? A Research Framework for Understanding the Causes of Civil War in Sub-Sahara Africa. Crisis States Discussion Paper 15, LSE, London.Google Scholar
  23. Mac Ginty, Roger. 2011. International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCrudden, Christopher, and Brendan O’Leary. 2013. Courts and Consociations, or How Human Rights Courts May De-stabilize Power-Sharing Settlements. European Journal of International Law 24 (2): 477–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Migdal, Joel S. 1988. Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Migdal, Joel S. 2001. State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. North, Douglass C. 1991. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. North, Douglass C., John Joseph Wallis, and Barry R. Weingast. 2009. Violence and Social Orders a Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paris, Roland. 2011. Ordering the World: Academic Research and Policymaking on Fragile States. International Studies Review 13 (1): 58–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parks, Thomas, and William Cole. 2010. Political Settlements: Implications for International Development Policy and Practice. Occasional Paper No. 2, The Asia Foundation.Google Scholar
  31. Pospisil, Jan. 2017. “Unsharing” Sovereignty: g7+ and the Politics of International Statebuilding. International Affairs 93 (6): 1417–1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pospisil, Jan, and Florian P. Kühn. 2016. The Resilient State: New Regulatory Modes in International Approaches to State Building? Third World Quarterly 37 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pospisil, Jan, and Alina Rocha Menocal. 2017. Why Political Settlements Matter: Navigating Inclusion in Processes of Institutional Transformation. Journal of International Development 29 (5): 551–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pritchett, Lant, Michael Woolcock, and Matt Andrews. 2010. Capability Traps? The Mechanisms of Persistent Implementation Failure. Working Paper 234, Center for Global Development, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  35. Richmond, Oliver P. 2016. Peace Formation and Political Order in Conflict Affected Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rocha Menocal, Alina. 2015. Inclusive Political Settlements: Evidence, Gaps, and Challenges of Institutional Transformation. DLP Working Paper, University of Birmingham, DLP, Birmingham.Google Scholar
  37. Tilly, Charles. 1985. War Making and State Making as Organized Crime. In Bringing the State Back in, ed. Peter Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol, 169–187. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Verweijen, Judith. 2016. Stable Instability: Political Settlements and Armed Groups in the Congo. London: RVI Usalama Project, Political Settlements Research Programme.Google Scholar
  39. Walker, Neil. 2014. Our Constitutional Unsettlement. Public Law 7 (2014): 529–548.Google Scholar
  40. Wise, Laura. 2018. Territorial Power-Sharing and Inclusion in Peace Processes. PA-X Report: Power Sharing Series. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Political Settlements Research Programme.Google Scholar
  41. World Bank and United Nations. 2018. Pathways for Peace: Inclusive Approaches to Preventing Violent Conflict. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zartman, I. William. 1989. Ripe for Resolution: Conflict and Intervention in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ASPR—Austrian Study Centre for Peace and Conflict ResolutionViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations