Advertisement

Searching the Identity of Information Systems: A Study from Interdisciplinary Contexts

  • Paolo Rocchi
  • Andrea Resca
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 533)

Abstract

Purpose: The present paper addresses the problem of the information systems (IS) identity, in particular it makes an attempt to identify the intellectual causes that hinder the research about the core of IS and suggests how to remove them.

Design/methodology/approach: Authors who argue on the cultural core of IS sometimes relate this argument to the ‘reference disciplines’ of IS such as economics and sociology. Authors rarely examine what happens in parallel domains of knowledge usually labeled as ‘cognate disciplines’ of IS. We fixed to extend inquiries on the close domains, in particular we have analyzed the literature of artificial intelligence, information retrieval, medical informatics, digital humanities and software engineering.

Findings: Bibliographical evidence shows how these disciplines struggle with the ‘identity crisis’ as IS do; more precisely thinkers share non-trivial difficulties when they argue about broad topics connected to the information technology such as the possibilities and limits of computer systems, the transfer and diffusion of technology etc.

Research implications: We recall how normally philosophy and science progress side to side and cooperate. Instead, the modern literature shows how computer science illustrates all the technical details but does not provide effective explanations to philosophers of post-computation disciplines. Several narrow theories underpin computer systems that prove to be futile to thinkers who address broad arguments. An apparent cause-effect relationship emerges between the fragmentary notions of computer science and the current ‘identity crisis’ of IS and cognate disciplines.

Originality/value: This study leads to a ground-breaking conclusion. In the first stage, the solution to the identity problem should not be searched inside IS but outside. Secondly as soon as possible noteworthy efforts should be made in order to improve the theoretical basis of informatics. More precisely computing theorists should develop a unified cultural frame or, at least, should make significant progress toward this direction.

Keywords

IS identity Foundational issues Interdisciplinary research Computing theories 

References

  1. 1.
    Sage, S.M.: Information systems: a brief look into history. Datamation 11, 63–69 (1968)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Langefors, B.: Some approaches to the theory of information systems. BIT 3, 229–254 (1963)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reisig, G.H.R.: Information-system structure by communication-technology concepts: a cybernetic model approach. Inf. Process. Manage. 14(6), 405–417 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Laudon Kenneth, C., Laudon, J.P.: Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm. Prentice Hall/CourseSmart, Upper Saddle River (2009)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Falkenberg, E.D., et al.: A Framework for Information Systems Concepts, the FRISCO Report (1988). (web edition) http://www.mathematik.uni-marburg.de/~hesse/papers/fri-full.pdf. Accessed Mar 2017
  6. 6.
    Lucey, T.: Management Information System, 9th edn. Thomson Publ., London (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wood-Harper, A.T., Antill, L., Avison, D.E.: Information Systems Definition: The Multiview Approach. Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd., Oxford (1985)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grover, V., Ayyagari, R., Gokhale, R., Lim, J.: A citation analysis of the evolution and state of information systems within a constellation of reference disciplines. J. AIS 7, 270–325 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baskerville, R., Myers, D.: Information systems as a reference discipline. MIS Q. 26, 1–14 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Markus, M.L., Lee, A.S.: Special issue on intensive research in information systems: using qualitative, interpretive, and case methods to study information technology. MIS Q. 23(1), 35–38 (1999). MIS Q. 24(1), 1–2 (2000a). MIS Q. 24(3), 473–474 (2000b)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee, A.L.: Retrospect and prospect: information systems research in the last and next 25 years. J. Inf. Technol. 25, 336–348 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Banker, R.D., Kauffman, R.J.: 50th anniversary article: the evolution of research on information systems: a fiftieth-year survey of the literature in management science. Manage. Sci. 50(3), 281–298 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J.S., Ramakrishnan, T.: Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. MIS Q. 32(3), 467–482 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Benbasat, I., Zmud, R.W.: The identity crisis within the IS discipline: defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties. MIS Q. 27(2), 183–194 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Whitley, E.A., Gal, U., Kjaergaard, A.: Who do you think you are? A review of the complex interplay between information systems, identification and identity. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 23(1), 17–35 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roberts, N., Galluch, P.S., Dinger, M., Grover, V.: Absorptive capacity and information systems research: review, synthesis, and directions for future research. MIS Q. 36(2), 625–648 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alvesson, M., Sandberg, J.: Habitat and habitus: boxed-in versus box-breaking research. Organ. Stud. 35(7), 967–987 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M.: The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Society. Sage Publications, London (1997)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Alderman, N., Ivory, C., Mcloughlin, I., Vaughan, R.: Managing Complex Projects: Networks, Knowledge and Integration. Routledge, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thaller, M.: From History to Applied Computer Science in the Humanities. Historical Social Research, Supplement 29 (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Robinson L., Priego E., Bawden D.: Library and information science and digital humanities: two disciplines, joint future? In: Pehar, F., Schlögl, C., Wolff, C. (eds.) Re-inventing Information Science in the Networked Society, Verlag, pp. 44–54 (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hockey, S.: Electronic Texts in the Humanitie. Oxford University Press, New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McCarty, W.: Humanities computing: essential problems, experimental practice. Lit. Linguist. Comput. 17(1), 103–125 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bod, R.: A New History of the Humanities: The Search for Principles and Patterns from Antiquity to the Present. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Salton, G.: Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis, and Retrieval of Information by Computer. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Boston (1989)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lancaster, F.W., Warner, A.J.: Information Retrieval Today. Info Resources Publ., Arlington (1993). Revised editionGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ellis, D.: A Behavioural approach to information retrieval design. J. Doc. 46(3), 318–338 (1989)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ingwersen, P.: Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction. J. Doc. 52(1), 3–50 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lazakidou, A.A., Siassiakos, K.M.: Handbook of Research on Distributed Medical Informatics and E-Health. Medical Information Science Reference Publisher, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kalet, I.J.: Principles of Biomedical Informatics. Academic Press, Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Greenes, R.A., Shortliffe, E.H.: Medical informatics: an emerging discipline with academic and institutional perspectives. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 263(8), 1114–1120 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Smith, P., Ali, S.: Is software engineering really engineering? In: Brebbia, C.A., Ferrante, A.J. (eds.) Reliability and Robustness of Engineering Software II, pp. 85–95. Springer, Dordrecht (1991).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3026-4_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kruchten, P.: Putting the engineering into software engineering. Innovations 4(1), 23–24 (2000)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Denning, P.J., Freeman, P.: Computing’s paradigm. Commun. ACM 52(1), 28–30 (2009)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Beizer, B.: Software is different. Ann. Softw. Eng. 10(1–4), 293–310 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Herbsleb, J.D.: Beyond computer science. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 23–27 (2005)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kirsh, D. (ed.): Foundations of Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    McCorduck, P.: Machines who Think: A Personal Inquiry into the History and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence. AK Peters Ltd., Natick (2004)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Snodgrass, C.R., Szewczak, E.J. (eds.) Human Factors in Information Systems. IRM Press, Hershey (2002). Carey, J. (ed.) Intellect Books (1997), (1995), (1991)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Donnellan, B., Larsen, T., Levine, L., DeGross, J. (eds.): The Transfer and Diffusion of Information Technology for Organizational Resilience. Springer, New York (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-34410-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lindgaard, G.: Some important factors for successful technology transfer. In: Levin, L. (ed.) Diffusion Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology, pp. 53–66. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1994)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J.: Diffusing best practices: a design science study using the theory of planned behavior. In: Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Nielsen, P.A. (eds.) TDIT 2014. IAICT, vol. 429, pp. 35–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43459-8_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hsu, J., Huang, J., Fung, V., Robertson, N., Jimison, H., Frankel, R.: Health information technology and physician-patient interactions: impact of computers on communication during outpatient primary care visits. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 12(4), 474–480 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Russel, R.J., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2009)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Berry, D.M., Fagerjord, A.: Digital Humanities: Knowledge and Critique in a Digital Age. Wiley, Hoboken (2017)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gershenfeld, N.: When Things Start to Think. Hodder & Stoughton, London (1999)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Peek, R.P., Newby, G.B. (eds.): Scholarly Publishing: The Electronic Frontier. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Salles, M.: Decision-Making and the Information System. Wiley, Hoboken (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Orlikowski, W.J., Iacono, C.S.: Research commentary: desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research - a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inf. Syst. Res. 12(2), 121–134 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Larsen, S.E., et al.: No future without humanities: literary perspectives. Humanities 4, 13–148 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rech, J., Althoff, K.D.: Artificial intelligence and software engineering: status and future trends. Künstliche Intelligenz 18, 5–11 (2004)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Charikar, M., Chekuri, C., Feder, T., Motwani, R.: Incremental clustering and dynamic information retrieval. SIAM J. Comput. 33(6), 1417–1440 (2004)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Chen, H., Chiang, R.H.L., Storey, V.C.: Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Q. 36(4), 1165–1188 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mahler, T.: Governance models for interoperable electronic identities. J. Int. Commer. Law Technol. 8(2), 148–159 (2013)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Knuth, D.: The Art of Computer Programming, vol. 1, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Redwood City (1973)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Eden, A.H.: Three paradigms of computer science. Minds Mach. Spec. Issue Philos. Comput. Sci. 17(2), 135–167 (2007)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Baldwin, D.: Is computer science a relevant academic discipline for the 21st century? IEEE Comput. 44(12), 81–83 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hayes, B.: Cultures of code. Am. Sci. 103(1), 10–13 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tedre, M.: Computing as a science: a survey of competing viewpoints. Mind. Mach. 21, 361–387 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Denning, P.J.: Is computer science? Commun. ACM 48(4), 27–31 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hassan, N.R.: Is information systems a discipline? Foucauldian and Toulminian insights. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 20(4), 456–476 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Rocchi, P.: “Informatics and electronics: some educational remarks” Guest editorial. IEEE Trans. Educ. 59(3), 233–239 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Rocchi, P.: Technology + Culture = Software. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rocchi, P.: Logic of Analog and Digital Machines. Nova Science Publishers, New York (2013). Revised EditionGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IBMRomeItaly
  2. 2.LUISS Guido Carli Univ.RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations