Advertisement

Referendums and Democratic Theory

  • Saskia Hollander
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses referendums in relation to democratic theory. It outlines two well-known theoretical dimensions: the dimension that contrasts citizens’ direct participation with political representation, and the dimension that contrasts aggregative with integrative decision-making. It shows that the extent to which referendums provide citizens with an instrument to participate in decision-making directly depends on the nature of the referendum. Some referendums give primacy to popular sovereignty, while others remain largely controlled by political representatives and hence, are merely instruments of party democracy. Moreover, while some merely reflect aggregative decision-making, others provide scope to integrating minority views. Bearing this in mind, the chapter distinguishes five types of referendum based on the actors triggering them: legislative majority, legislative minority, presidential, citizen-initiated and mandatory referendums.

Keywords

Democratic theory Popular sovereignty Representative sovereignty Aggregative versus integrative decision-making Referendum classification 

Bibliography

  1. Aristotle; Jowett, B. (trans.) and H.W.C. Davis (intr.). c.350 BC/2000. Politics. Mineola: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Barber, B.R. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bentham, J. 1789/1823. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bogdanor, V. 1981. The People and the Party System: The Referendum and Electoral Reform in British Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Budge, I. 1993. Direct Democracy: Setting Appropriate Terms of Debate. In Prospects for Democracy, ed. D. Held. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1996. The New Challenge of Direct Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, J. 1996. Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy. In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. S. Benhabib. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, J., and A. Fung. 2004. Radical Democracy. Swiss Journal of Political Science 10 (4): 23–34.Google Scholar
  9. Cronin, T.E. 1999. Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum and Recall. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dahl, R.A. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. de Montesquieu, C. Baron. 1748/2007. The Spirit of the Laws. New York: Cosimo.Google Scholar
  13. Dicey, A.V. 1885. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  14. Dryzek, J. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Elster, J., ed. 1998. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Finley, M.I. 1973. The Ancient Economy. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fishkin, J.S. 2009. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hamilton, A., J. Madison, and J. Jay. 1864/2005. The Federalist: A Collection of Essays, Written in Favor of the New Constitution. Clark: Lawbook Exchange.Google Scholar
  19. Hamon, F. 1995. Le Référendum: Étude Comparative. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
  20. Held, D. 1996. Models of Democracy. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hendriks, F. 2006. Vitale Democratie: Theorie van Democratie in Actie. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ———. 2010. Vital Democracy: A Theory of Democracy in Action. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hendriks, F., K. van der Krieken, and C. Wagenaar. 2017. Democratische vloek of zegen. Aantekeningen bij het referendum. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hobbes, T. 1651/2006. Leviathan. Mineola: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  25. James, M. 1981. Public Interest and Majority Rule in Bentham’s Democratic Theory. Political Theory 9 (1): 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jung, S. 1996. Lijpharts Demokratietypen und die Direkte Demokratie. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 6 (3): 623–645.Google Scholar
  27. Kant, I. 1795/2007. Perpetual Peace. London: Filiquarian Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Kendall, W. 1941. John Locke and the Doctrine of Majority-Rule. Urbana: The University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  29. Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  30. LeDuc, L. 2002. Referendums and Initiatives: The Politics of Direct Democracy. In Comparing Democracies II: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting, ed. L. LeDuc, R.G. Niemi, and P. Norris, 70–88. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Lijphart, A. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian & Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 1999. Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Locke, J.; Laslett, P. (ed.). 1689/1988. Two Treatises of Government (student ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lucardie, P. 2012. From Crisis to Democracy? An Exercise in Political Imagination. In Creative Crises of Democracy, ed. J. Gijsenbergh, S. Hollander, T. Houwen, and W. de Jong, 47–59. Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  35. Machiavelli, N.; Thomson, N.H. (trans.). 1531/2007. Discourses on Livy. Mineola: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Machiavelli, N.; Detmold, C.E. (trans.) and L.M. Kekewich (intr.). 1532/1997. The Prince. Ware: Wordsworth Editions Limited.Google Scholar
  37. Madison, J.; Hunt, G. (ed.). 1783–1787/1901. The Writings of James Madison: Comprising His Public Papers and His Private Correspondence (vol. 2). New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
  38. March, J.G., and J.P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  39. Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1848/2005. The Communist Manifesto. London: Filiquarian Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Marxer, W., and Z.T. Pállinger. 2007. ‘System Contexts and System Effects on Direct Democracy – Direct Democracy in Liechtenstein and Switzerland Compared. In Direct Democracy in Europe: Developments and Prospects, ed. Z.T. Pállinger, B. Kaufmann, W. Marxer, and T. Schiller, 12–29. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mill, J.S. 1861. Considerations on Representative Government. London: Parker, Son, and Bourn.Google Scholar
  42. Milbrath, L.W., and M.L. Goel. 1977. Political Participation: How and Why do People Get Involved in Politics? Chicago: Rand McNally College Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  43. Möckli, S. 1994. Direkte Demokratie. Ein Internationaler Vergleigh. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
  44. Morel, L. 1993. Party Attitudes Towards Referendums in Western Europe. West European Politics 16 (3): 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. ———. 2001. The Rise of Government-Initiated Referendums in Consolidated Democracies. In Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns, ed. M. Mendelsohn and A. Parkin, 47–64. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Morel, L., and M. Qvortrup, eds. 2018. The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Offe, C. 1997. Microaspects of Democratic Theory: What Makes for the Deliberative Competence of Citizens? In Democracy’s Victory and Crisis, ed. A. Hadenius, 81–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Osbun, L.A. 1985. The Problem of Participation: A Radical Critique of Contemporary Democratic Theory. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  49. Pateman, C. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. ———. 2012. Participatory Democracy Revisited. Perspectives on Politics 10 (1): 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Qvortrup, M. 1999. A.V. Dicey: The Referendum as the People’s Veto. History of Political Thought 20 (3): 531–546.Google Scholar
  52. Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. ———. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Rodrigues, A.F.G. 2013. The Referendum in the Portuguese Constitutional Experience (diss.). Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Rosanvallon, P. 2008. Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rousseau, J.-J.; Gourevitch, V. (ed.) 1762/1997. The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Schumpeter, J.S. 1942/1976. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: George Allen and Unwin Publishers.Google Scholar
  58. Sen, I.G. 2015. Sovereignty Referendums in International and Constitutional Law. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  59. Setälä, M. 1999. Referendums and Democratic Government: Normative Theory and the Analysis of Institutions. Houndmills: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. ———. 2006. On the Problems of Responsibility and Accountability in Referendums. European Journal of Political Research 45 (4): 699–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shapiro, I. 2002. The State of Democratic Theory. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. I. Katznelson and H.V. Milner, 235–265. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  62. Smith, G. 1976. The Functional Properties of the Referendum. European Journal of Political Research 4 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Suksi, M. 1993. Bringing in the People: A Comparison of Constitutional Forms and Practices. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  64. Thucydides; Warner, R. (trans.) and M.I. Finley (ed./intr.). c.431BC/1972. History of the Peloponnesian War. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  65. Truman, D.B. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  66. Tully, J. 2008. Public Philosophy in a New Key. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Uleri, P.V. 1996. Introduction. In The Referendum Experience in Europe, ed. M. Gallagher and P.V. Uleri, 1–19. Houndmills: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  68. Van Peperstraten, F. 1999. Samenleving ter discussie. Een inleiding in de sociale filosofie. Bussum: Uitgeverij Coutinho.Google Scholar
  69. Van Reybrouck, D. 2013. Tegen Verkiezingen. Amsterdam: De Bezige Bij.Google Scholar
  70. Vatter, A. 2002. Kantonale Demokratien im Vergleich: Entstehungsgründe, Interaktionen und Wirkungen politischer Institutionen in den Schweizer Kantonen. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. ———. 2009. Lijphart Expanded: Three Dimensions of Democracy in Advanced OECD Countries? European Journal of Political Review 1 (1): 125–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Weber, M. 1919/1991. Politics as a Vocation. In From Max Weber, M. Weber; H.H. Gerth and C.W. Mills (trans./eds.); B.S. Turner (pref.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Wenman, M. 2013. Agonistic Democracy: Constituent Power in the Era of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saskia Hollander
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Director of Knowledge Management, The BrokerDen HaagThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Research fellow, Department of Public Administration and Political ScienceRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations