Advertisement

Fuzzy-Based Failure Diagnostic Analysis in a Chemical Process Industry

  • Mohammad Yazdi
  • Mahlagha Darvishmotevali
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 896)

Abstract

Failure analysis is vital to prevent potential incidents in chemical process industries. The varieties of different failure analysis methods such as fault tree analysis (FTA) help assessors to optimize the amount of risk by providing corresponding corrective actions. However, such conventional failure analysis techniques still suffer from several shortages. As an example, availability of failure data in some cases is rare and besides they cannot be much more effective in dynamic structure. In this paper, a new framework based on probabilistic failure analysis using an integration of FTA and Petri-nets are proposed to provide ability in dynamic structure. Fuzzy logic is also used to deal with uncertainty conditions when there is a lack of information. A real case study of kick in chemical process industry is surveyed to show the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed model.

Keywords

Failure analysis Uncertainty Aggregation 

References

  1. 1.
    Yazdi, M.: An extension of fuzzy improved risk graph and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for determination of chemical complex safety integrity levels. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 1–11 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2017.1419654
  2. 2.
    Yazdi, M., Zarei, E.: Uncertainty handling in the safety risk analysis: an integrated approach based on fuzzy fault tree analysis. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 18(2), 392–404 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kalantarnia, M., Khan, F., Hawboldt, K.: Modelling of BP Texas City refinery accident using dynamic risk assessment approach. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 88(3), 191–199 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yazdi, M., Korhan, O., Daneshvar, S.: Application of fuzzy fault tree analysis based on modified fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for fire and explosion in process industry. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 1–18 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1454636
  5. 5.
    Yazdi, M.: Improving failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) with consideration of uncertainty handling as an interactive approach. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 1–18 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-018-0496-2
  6. 6.
    Yazdi, M., Daneshvar, S., Setareh, H.: An extension to fuzzy developed failure mode and effects analysis application for aircraft landing system. Saf. Sci. 98(1), 113–123 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kabir, S., Yazdi, M., Aizpurua, J.I., Papadopoulos, Y.: Uncertainty-aware dynamic reliability analysis framework for complex systems. IEEE Access 6(1), 29499–29515 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-018-0496-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yazdi, M., Soltanali, H.: Knowledge acquisition development in failure diagnosis analysis as an interactive approach. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 1–18 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-018-0504-6
  9. 9.
    Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yazdi, M.: Risk assessment based on novel intuitionistic fuzzy-hybrid-modified TOPSIS approach. Saf. Sci. 1–11(2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Atanassov, K.T.: On the concept of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boran, F., Genç, S., Kurt, M., Akay, D.: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(8), 11363–11368 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anzilli, L., Facchinetti, G.: A new proposal of defuzzification of intuitionistic fuzzy quantities, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 185–195. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yazdi, M.: Hybrid probabilistic risk assessment using fuzzy FTA and fuzzy AHP in a process industry. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 17(4), 756–764 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhou, K.Q., Zain, A.M.: Fuzzy Petri nets and industrial applications: a review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 45(4), 405–446 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dutuit, Y., Rauzy, A.: Efficient algorithms to assess component and gate importance in fault tree analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 72(2), 213–222 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yazdi, M.: Footprint of knowledge acquisition improvement in failure diagnosis analysis. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 1–18 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2408

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Marine Technology and Ocean Engineering (CENTEC), Instituto Superior TécnicoUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.School of Tourism and Hotel ManagementNear East UniversityNicosia, Mersin 10Turkey

Personalised recommendations